本文選題：聯(lián)邦黨人政府 + 杰斐遜政府��； 參考：《渤海大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文

【摘要】：1791年海地革命爆發(fā)，作為很早就淪為歐洲大國(guó)殖民地的西印度群島來(lái)說(shuō)，這是一件具有深遠(yuǎn)意義的大事。因?yàn)槲挥谄浔泵嬗行陋?dú)立的美利堅(jiān)共和國(guó)，同時(shí)其母國(guó)是啟蒙思想的故鄉(xiāng)，在民主、平等和博愛(ài)思想的啟發(fā)下正進(jìn)行著排山倒海般的大革命，然而圣多明各島上還存在著最野蠻的奴隸制，因此在這一系列因素的刺激下，海地黑人聚集起來(lái)爭(zhēng)取自由的斗爭(zhēng)。海地爆發(fā)革命后，聯(lián)邦黨人政府對(duì)海地內(nèi)部的沖突最初采取比較保守的孤立主義政策，繼而在約翰·亞當(dāng)斯政府時(shí)期執(zhí)行了援助黑人勢(shì)力的政策。隨著杰斐遜的上臺(tái)，美國(guó)轉(zhuǎn)變了前任的海地政策，，從援助海地黑人力量轉(zhuǎn)向敵視黑人奴隸革命，不久后，面臨著拿破侖的美洲帝國(guó)野心的威脅，又轉(zhuǎn)向疏遠(yuǎn)法國(guó)親近黑人政權(quán)的政策；最后美國(guó)在國(guó)內(nèi)國(guó)外形勢(shì)的推動(dòng)下對(duì)海地共和國(guó)采取了不承認(rèn)的政策。盡管聯(lián)邦黨執(zhí)政府和民主共和黨執(zhí)政府都援助過(guò)黑人起義勢(shì)力，但是杰斐遜政府的海地政策的制定不僅要考慮傳統(tǒng)的安全和利益因素，更要面對(duì)國(guó)內(nèi)敏感的種族主義和奴隸制問(wèn)題，這些才是美國(guó)海地政策背后的深層原因，因此聯(lián)邦黨與民主共和黨之間關(guān)于海地政策分歧的實(shí)質(zhì)是站在各自代表的利益集團(tuán)的角度，根據(jù)海地島上的軍事和政治形勢(shì)的演變爭(zhēng)取最大限度的實(shí)現(xiàn)美國(guó)的國(guó)家利益的結(jié)果；甚至與海地之間的外交實(shí)踐也奠定了美國(guó)早期拉美政策基礎(chǔ)。
[Abstract]:The outbreak of the Haitian Revolution in 1791 was a profound event for the West Indies, an early European colony. Because to its north lies the newly independent Republic of America, and its home country is the home of the Enlightenment, inspired by the ideas of democracy, equality and fraternity, which are undergoing a sweeping revolution. Yet the most brutal slavery still exists on Santo Domingo, so black Haitians gathered together to fight for freedom. After the revolution broke out in Haiti, the federal government initially adopted a conservative isolationist policy towards the internal conflict in Haiti, and then carried out the policy of assisting the black forces during the period of John Adams administration. With Jefferson coming to power, the United States changed its predecessor's policy in Haiti from aiding the black forces in Haiti to hostile to the black slave revolution, and soon faced the threat of Napoleon's American imperial ambitions. It turned to the policy of alienating France from the black regime; finally, the United States adopted a policy of non-recognition of the Republic of Haiti under the push of the situation at home and abroad. Although both the federal government and the democratic Republican government have helped the Negro uprising, the Jefferson administration's policy in Haiti is not just about traditional security and interests. We have to face the sensitive issues of racism and slavery in our country. These are the deep reasons behind the US policy in Haiti. Therefore, the essence of the difference between the Federal Party and the Democratic Republican Party on the Haitian policy is to strive for the maximum realization of the national interests of the United States on the basis of the evolution of the military and political situation in Haitien, from the angle of the interest groups represented by them; Even diplomatic practice with Haiti laid the foundations of America's early Latin American policy.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：渤海大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號(hào)】：K752.41;K712.44

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 楊衛(wèi)東;拉美獨(dú)立運(yùn)動(dòng)與美國(guó)孤立主義外交的重新界定[J];拉丁美洲研究;2003年06期

本文編號(hào)：1828292