本文選題：俄羅斯帝國 + 蘇聯(lián)　； 參考：《中國社會科學院研究生院》2009年博士論文

【摘要】： 《蘇聯(lián)領土擴張研究》重點研究蘇維埃政權時期蘇聯(lián)的領土變遷,特別是第二次世界大戰(zhàn)期間蘇聯(lián)領土的擴張。除“導論”外全文共分九章。 “導論”部分闡明論文選題的來源、研究現(xiàn)狀、論文創(chuàng)新及論文結構等問題。第一章是全文的理論架構,概述國際法中的領土及相關理論、國際政治理論中的地緣政治理論。 第二章著重回顧俄羅斯帝國的領土擴張史,強調指出俄羅斯帝國通過對外發(fā)動戰(zhàn)爭進行領土擴張的特點,揭示蘇聯(lián)領土擴張的歷史淵源。 第三章介紹了十月革命后到第二次世界大戰(zhàn)前夕蘇聯(lián)領土的變遷以及列寧“不割地、不賠款”的政策主張。 第四章至第八章論述蘇聯(lián)在第二次世界大戰(zhàn)期間的領土擴張,這是本論文的重點。第四章至第五章論述第二次世界大戰(zhàn)期間,蘇聯(lián)兼并了波羅的海三國、羅馬尼亞的比薩拉比亞和北布科維納、波蘭的西烏克蘭和西白俄羅斯、芬蘭的卡累利阿和貝柴摩、捷克斯洛伐克的外喀爾巴阡烏克蘭、德國的哥尼斯堡、中國的唐努烏梁海、日本的千島群島和南庫頁島等地區(qū),總面積近72萬平方公里。 第六章介紹蘇聯(lián)在第二次世界大戰(zhàn)后為鞏固領土擴張成果在外交和理論宣傳上所做的努力。本章對蘇聯(lián)提出的若干“理論依據(jù)”進行分析。 第七章著重分析導致蘇聯(lián)走向領土擴張道路的各種因素,其中包括思想、歷史、經濟和地緣政治環(huán)境等根源。 第八章集中分析蘇聯(lián)領土擴張給自身造成的嚴重消極后果。蘇聯(lián)的領土擴張并沒有給自己帶來真正的安全,而且成為導致蘇聯(lián)衰落和最終解體的重要因素之一。 第九章介紹蘇聯(lián)解體后新俄羅斯即俄羅斯聯(lián)邦所面臨的領土及邊界形勢。俄羅斯既繼承了蘇聯(lián)與一些鄰國的領土邊界問題,又出現(xiàn)了與“新鄰國”之間復雜的領土邊界爭端。“結束語”簡要說明從蘇聯(lián)領土擴張研究中得到的幾點啟示:領土擴張并不能給一個國家?guī)碚嬲陌踩?在當今世界,領土主權仍是各國的核心利益,但領土擴張早已不符合當今的時代潮流;國家間領土爭端的解決只能通過和平方式解決。
[Abstract]:The study of the Soviet Union's territorial expansion focuses on the Soviet Union's territorial changes during the Soviet regime, especially the Soviet Union's territorial expansion during the second World War. In addition to the introduction, the full text is divided into nine chapters. The introduction clarifies the origin, research status, innovation and structure of the thesis. The first chapter is the theoretical framework of the full text, summarizing the territory and related theories in international law and geopolitical theory in international political theory. The second chapter mainly reviews the history of the territorial expansion of the Russian Empire, and points out the characteristics of the territorial expansion of the Russian Empire by waging war with the outside world, thus revealing the historical origin of the territorial expansion of the Soviet Union. The third chapter introduces the change of Soviet territory from October Revolution to the eve of World War II and Lenin's policy of "no land cut, no reparations". The fourth to eighth chapters discuss the Soviet Union's territorial expansion during the second World War, which is the focus of this thesis. Chapters IV to V deal with the annexation of the three Baltic States by the Soviet Union during the second World War, Bisharabia and North Bukovina in Romania, Western Ukraine and Western Belarus in Poland, Karelia and Betchaemo in Finland, Czechoslovakia's outer Carpathian Ukraine, Germany's Konisburg, China's Tang Nuwu Lianghai, Japan's Kuril Islands and South Sakhalin, the total area of nearly 720000 square kilometers. The sixth chapter describes the Soviet Union's diplomatic and theoretical efforts to consolidate its territorial expansion after World War II. This chapter analyzes some "theoretical bases" put forward by the Soviet Union. Chapter seven focuses on the analysis of various factors leading to the Soviet Union's territorial expansion, including ideological, historical, economic and geopolitical environment. The eighth chapter focuses on the serious negative consequences caused by the expansion of Soviet territory. The Soviet Union's territorial expansion did not bring real security to itself and became an important factor in the decline and eventual disintegration of the Soviet Union. Chapter 9 introduces the territory and border situation of the new Russia, the Russian Federation after the disintegration of the Soviet Union. Russia not only inherited the territorial border between the Soviet Union and some neighboring countries, but also had a complicated territorial border dispute with its new neighbors. The concluding remarks briefly illustrate some of the revelations from the study of the Soviet Union's territorial expansion: territorial expansion does not bring real security to a country; in today's world, territorial sovereignty remains the core interest of all States. But territorial expansion has long been out of line with the current trend; the settlement of territorial disputes between states can only be resolved by peaceful means.
【學位授予單位】：中國社會科學院研究生院
【學位級別】：博士
【學位授予年份】：2009
【分類號】：K512.5

【引證文獻】

相關期刊論文 前2條

1 劉志云;;中國的國際關系與國際法跨學科研究:回顧與展望[J];武大國際法評論;2011年01期

2 牟沫英;;近十年俄羅斯史學界對國家陸地邊界的研究[J];中國邊疆史地研究;2012年01期

相關碩士學位論文 前1條

1 李秋霜;后冷戰(zhàn)時代的俄烏關系[D];黑龍江大學;2011年

，

本文編號：1819053