本文選題：東亞封貢秩序 + 古代民族志�。� 參考：《史學(xué)集刊》2017年05期

【摘要】：唐朝與日本傳世文獻(xiàn)中的渤海"首領(lǐng)"是學(xué)術(shù)界討論的焦點(diǎn)之一,但已有研究在方法論方面存在誤區(qū)。"首領(lǐng)"在封貢秩序的語(yǔ)境中,主要是用于指稱四夷社會(huì)的習(xí)用語(yǔ)匯,帶有鮮明的立場(chǎng)性和指向性。唐朝、日本、渤海三方文獻(xiàn)記述的渤海"首領(lǐng)"記述立場(chǎng)不一,其指涉對(duì)象并非同一范疇,并不能如實(shí)地記述渤海地方社會(huì)之狀況。渤海"首領(lǐng)"的話語(yǔ)是古代東亞世界各方在華夷分野語(yǔ)境之下,能動(dòng)地塑造自我中心立場(chǎng)的表現(xiàn)。
[Abstract]:The "leader" of the Bohai Sea in the literature of Tang Dynasty and Japan is one of the focal points in academic circles, but there are some misunderstandings in methodology. " Chief "in the context of Fenggong order, mainly used to refer to the four Yi society, with a clear position and direction." In Tang Dynasty, Japan and Bohai Sea, the "leaders" recorded in the literature of the Bohai Sea have different positions, and their referring objects are not the same category, and they can not accurately describe the local social conditions in the Bohai Sea. The words of the "leaders" in the Bohai Sea are the expression of all the parties in the ancient East Asia who, in the context of the division between China and the foreign lands, have been actively shaping their self-centered stand.
【作者單位】： 中國(guó)社會(huì)科學(xué)院歷史研究所;
【基金】：國(guó)家哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)基金項(xiàng)目“‘絲綢之路’與女真政治文明研究”(16CZS032)階段性研究成果
【分類號(hào)】：K31
，

本文編號(hào)：1807817