本文選題：山海關(guān)　切入點(diǎn)：華夷思想　出處：《清史研究》2012年04期

【摘要】：明朝時(shí)期,朝鮮人并無以山海關(guān)為界、關(guān)內(nèi)外華夷不同的"分界"概念。但明清易代,政治局面的巨變促使朝鮮人大大地強(qiáng)化了華夷分界的意識,以致最終認(rèn)定山海關(guān)為明晰的"界線"。具體而言,清時(shí)期朝鮮人對關(guān)內(nèi)的種種自然、人文景觀往往表現(xiàn)出令人驚嘆的寬容和肯定;相反,對關(guān)外卻持著過于苛刻的否定態(tài)度。然而,有趣的是,清時(shí)期朝鮮人對關(guān)內(nèi)外分界意識逐漸強(qiáng)化之時(shí),兩地的文化差距實(shí)際上卻在日益縮小。而且,關(guān)內(nèi)永平府與關(guān)外遼西之間,其相似性甚至大于差異性。
[Abstract]:The Ming Dynasty, the Korean people is not bounded by Shanhaiguan, the Huayi different "boundaries" concept. But the Ming and Qing Dynasties, the political situation changes to urge North Korea to strengthen the NPC earth Huayi boundary consciousness, eventually identified Shanhaiguan as the clear boundaries. Specifically, the Korean people of all kinds of natural Qing Dynasty the customs, cultural landscape often exhibit tolerance and certain stunning; on the contrary, on the outside but hold the negative attitude too harsh. However, interestingly, the Korean people in Qing Dynasty the boundaries of consciousness gradually strengthen, the cultural gap between the two is actually in the increasingly narrow. Moreover, between Guannei Yongping the government and the customs of western Liaoning, the similarity is even greater than the difference.

【作者單位】： 南京大學(xué)歷史系;
【分類號】：K249;K312

【共引文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 穆紅麗;大柵欄與京劇起源關(guān)系研究[D];中央民族大學(xué);2006年

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 谷慶濤;日本型“華夷思想與華夷秩序體系”[D];東北師范大學(xué);2006年

，

本文編號：1724083