發(fā)布時間：2018-04-05 11:16

  本文選題：冷戰(zhàn)時期　切入點：聯(lián)邦德國　出處：《華東師范大學(xué)》2005年博士論文

【摘要】：冷戰(zhàn)的結(jié)束,兩極格局的消失,是20世紀(jì)的一次巨變,它不僅改變了當(dāng)代世界各方面特別是國際政治的面貌,而且也將對人類社會的發(fā)展產(chǎn)生深遠(yuǎn)的影響。在冷戰(zhàn)時期,北約和華約的軍事對峙是東西方對抗的重要內(nèi)容,也是20世紀(jì)后半期國際政治的一個顯著特征。作為北約組織成員并處于東西方對抗前沿的聯(lián)邦德國,深深地卷入了這場對抗之中。因此,研究聯(lián)邦德國在北約發(fā)展中的地位和作用具有重要的學(xué)術(shù)價值和現(xiàn)實意義。由于顯著的軍事性特征,組織的發(fā)展(包括成員的組成及數(shù)量、成員之間的團結(jié)特別是軍事上的聯(lián)系程度)、戰(zhàn)略的安排、武裝力量的建設(shè)及其部署是北約發(fā)展的主要內(nèi)容,它們之間相互關(guān)聯(lián),而且發(fā)展?fàn)顩r直接影響到北約實力的強弱,從而影響其抗衡華約的實力、態(tài)勢乃至勝負(fù)�；诖�,本文在論述這一命題時將從這些方面來展開。 全文主要分為七部分:第一章,“聯(lián)邦德國加入北約”。本章既是全文的鋪墊,又是論文的主要內(nèi)容之一。文章在充分論述聯(lián)邦德國重新武裝過程的基礎(chǔ)上,詳細(xì)分析了聯(lián)邦德國加入北約對北約發(fā)展的影響,并將之歸納為五個方面。同時,文章指出,倫敦—巴黎協(xié)定雖然既使西方實現(xiàn)了重新武裝聯(lián)邦德國以將其納入防務(wù)體系的目的,又使聯(lián)邦德國恢復(fù)了主權(quán)并通過加入北約而與西方結(jié)盟,但協(xié)定的限制性條款使聯(lián)邦德國在聯(lián)盟內(nèi)處于某種不平等地位,從而對聯(lián)邦德國日后在北約發(fā)展中的地位和作用產(chǎn)生影響。 第二章,“聯(lián)邦德國與北約的核力量建設(shè)”。在分析這一問題時,文章以北約“多邊核力量”計劃的流產(chǎn)和“核計劃小組”的成立為個案進行研究,認(rèn)為北約醞釀和出臺“多邊核力量”計劃的原因除了想借此彌補常規(guī)力量的劣勢和應(yīng)對蘇聯(lián)發(fā)射洲際導(dǎo)彈與人造衛(wèi)星的挑戰(zhàn)外,就是為了防止聯(lián)邦德國發(fā)展獨立核力量,而其流產(chǎn)又主要是由于英、法反對聯(lián)邦德國“染指”核武器以及美國由此而中立所出現(xiàn)的結(jié)果。就聯(lián)邦德國而言,盡管這段時期防務(wù)政策的重心向核防御轉(zhuǎn)變,并為擁有和參與控制核武器進行了不懈努力,但目標(biāo)沒有實現(xiàn),而只是成為核計劃小組的常任成員�？傮w上講,整個事件具有雙重性:一方面,計劃流產(chǎn)反映了盟國對聯(lián)邦德國仍存戒備心理,聯(lián)邦德國在北約中的地位和作用具有內(nèi)在的弱點;另一方面,核計劃小組的成立及聯(lián)邦德國成為其中的常任成員,又是聯(lián)邦德國自身努力及北約對其安撫的結(jié)果,這又說明聯(lián)邦德國在北約內(nèi)的作用在增強、地位在提高。 第三章,“聯(lián)邦德國與北約的常規(guī)軍事力量”。文章運用計量史學(xué)的方法,通過詳實的數(shù)據(jù)(全文數(shù)據(jù)有20多頁,其中表格17個)充分論證,聯(lián)邦德國在北約常規(guī)力量中的地位和作用經(jīng)歷了三個發(fā)展階段,即,經(jīng)歷了“北約中歐盟軍主
[Abstract]:The end of the Cold War and the disappearance of the bipolar pattern is a great change in the 20th century. It not only changes the face of all aspects of the contemporary world, especially the international politics, but also has a far-reaching impact on the development of human society.During the Cold War, the military confrontation between NATO and Warsaw Treaty was an important part of East-West confrontation and a remarkable feature of international politics in the second half of the 20th century.Federal Germany, a member of NATO and at the forefront of the East-West confrontation, was deeply involved in the confrontation.Therefore, it has important academic value and practical significance to study the status and role of Federal Germany in NATO development.Because of its prominent military character, the development of the organization (including the composition and number of members, the degree of solidarity among the members, especially the military ties), the strategic arrangement, the construction and deployment of the armed forces are the main contents of NATO's development.They are interrelated, and the development of NATO directly affects the strength of its strength, thereby affecting its strength, situation and even victory and defeat.Based on this, this paper will discuss this proposition from these aspects.The paper is divided into seven parts: chapter one, Federal Republic of Germany joining NATO.This chapter is not only the foreshadowing of the full text, but also one of the main contents of the thesis.On the basis of fully discussing the process of rearming the Federal Republic of Germany, this paper analyzes in detail the influence of the entry of the Federal Republic of Germany into NATO on the development of NATO, and concludes it into five aspects.At the same time, the article points out that although the London-Paris Agreement has enabled the West to rearm the Federal Republic of Germany in order to bring it into the defense system, it has also restored the sovereignty of the Federal Republic of Germany and allied itself with the West through NATO membership.However, the restrictive clauses of the agreement made the Federal Germany in an unequal position in the alliance, which had an impact on the future status and role of the Federal Germany in the development of NATO.The second chapter, the nuclear force construction of the Federal Republic of Germany and NATO.In analysing this issue, the article takes the abortion of NATO's "multilateral nuclear force" program and the establishment of the "nuclear program group" as case studies.It is believed that the reason for NATO's development and launch of the "multilateral nuclear force" program is to prevent the development of independent nuclear forces in the Federal Republic of Germany, in addition to trying to make up for the disadvantages of conventional forces and to meet the challenges posed by the Soviet Union in launching intercontinental missiles and artificial satellites.Its miscarriage was mainly due to the British, French opposition to the Federal Republic of Germany's "involvement" of nuclear weapons and the consequent neutrality of the United States.In the case of the Federal Republic of Germany, despite the shift in the focus of defence policy during this period to nuclear defence and unremitting efforts to possess and participate in the control of nuclear weapons, the goal was not achieved, but only as a permanent member of the nuclear program group.In general, the whole incident has a dual character: on the one hand, the miscarriage of the plan reflects the allies' remaining vigilance over the Federal Republic of Germany, whose position and role in NATO are inherently weak; on the other hand,The establishment of the nuclear program group and the permanent membership of the Federal Republic of Germany are also the result of the efforts of the Federal Republic of Germany itself and the appeasement of NATO. This also shows that the role of the Federal Republic of Germany in NATO is increasing and its status is increasing.Chapter three, the conventional military strength of the Federal Republic of Germany and NATO.By using the method of econometric history, and through detailed data (there are more than 20 pages of full text data, including 17 tables), the article fully demonstrates that the position and role of the Federal Republic of Germany in NATO's conventional forces has gone through three stages of development, namely,After the NATO Central and Central Allied Forces
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華東師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：博士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2005
【分類號】：K516

【引證文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 和春紅;法德和解與歐洲一體化[D];山東大學(xué);2012年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前4條

1 鞏鵬飛;二十世紀(jì)五十至六十年代初期聯(lián)邦德國的核政策[D];華中師范大學(xué);2011年

2 李靜文;核武器與中美關(guān)系[D];青島大學(xué);2007年

3 張亞輝;施密特時期的德美關(guān)系摩擦及原因[D];吉林大學(xué);2012年

4 魯昊;工黨政府與英國第二次申請加入歐共體研究（1964-1967）[D];華中師范大學(xué);2012年

，

本文編號：1714529