本文選題：遠東政策　切入點：外交政策　出處：《重慶師范大學(xué)》2009年碩士論文

【摘要】： 遠東問題在現(xiàn)代國際政治中一向占有突出的地位,英國的遠東戰(zhàn)略是英國全球戰(zhàn)略的重要組成部分。英國遠東政策的變化是英國世界地位由盛轉(zhuǎn)衰的顯示器。 本文從三個階段來產(chǎn)述英國遠東政策的演變。從第一次世界大戰(zhàn)爆發(fā)到1917年11月蘭辛——石井協(xié)定簽定,是這個時期英國遠東戰(zhàn)略演變的第一階段。在這個階段中,英國正處在對德戰(zhàn)爭的嚴峻時刻。英國大幅度地修改了它在戰(zhàn)前奉行的遠東戰(zhàn)略,成功地利用了日美兩國作為它反德斗爭的得力打手,從而維持和鞏固了它在遠東建立的反德體系,對實現(xiàn)其戰(zhàn)勝德國的世界戰(zhàn)略目標產(chǎn)生了重大的影響。 從1918年年初到1919年巴黎和會,是英國遠東戰(zhàn)略不斷演變的第二階段。在這個階段中,英國通過實行扶日抑美的遠東政策,挫敗了以雄厚的經(jīng)濟實力為后盾的美國提出的打掉英國世界霸權(quán)的戰(zhàn)后計劃企圖進而確立美國的世界霸權(quán)。英國新的遠東政策為配合它實現(xiàn)維持戰(zhàn)后獨攬世界霸權(quán)地位的世界戰(zhàn)略目標,發(fā)揮了巨大的作用。 從巴黎和會到1921年底、1922年初的華盛頓會議,是英國遠東政策進一步演變的第三階段。在這個階段中,英國去除了它同美國妥協(xié)的最大障礙——扶日抑美的遠東政策,通過轉(zhuǎn)而奉行聯(lián)美抑日的新遠東政策,暫時緩和了它與美國的矛盾,為達到它以英美妥協(xié)為基礎(chǔ),實現(xiàn)英國保住其生死攸關(guān)的那些既得利益、進而長期維持其世界霸權(quán)地位的戰(zhàn)略目標,創(chuàng)造了合適的國際條件。 “政治是經(jīng)濟的集中表現(xiàn)”。作為內(nèi)政延長的外交,是該國的世界經(jīng)濟地位的集中表現(xiàn)。 在第一次世界大戰(zhàn)中“獲得勝利、失去優(yōu)勢”的英帝國,已經(jīng)病入膏肓,無論它的外交家們?nèi)绾尉?也改變不了它江河日下的頹勢。這就是一個老牌帝國主義歷史發(fā)展的必然邏輯。
[Abstract]:The issue of the far East has always occupied a prominent position in modern international politics, and the British far East strategy is an important part of the British global strategy. The change of the British far East policy is a display of Britain's position in the world from prosperity to decline. This paper describes the evolution of British far East policy in three stages. From the outbreak of the first World War to the signing of the Lansing-Ishii Agreement in November 1917, it is the first stage of the evolution of the British far East strategy in this period. Britain was at a critical moment in the war against Germany. Britain greatly revised the far East strategy it had pursued before the war and successfully used Japan and the United States as its effective fighters in the struggle against Germany. Thus it maintained and consolidated its anti-German system in the far East and had a great influence on the realization of its world strategic goal of defeating Germany. The Paris Peace Conference from the beginning of 1918 to 1919 was the second stage of the continuous evolution of the British far East strategy. In this stage, Britain adopted the far East policy of supporting Japan and suppressing the United States. It thwarted the postwar plan put forward by the United States, backed by its strong economic strength, to destroy British world hegemony, and thus established American world hegemony. The world strategic goal of power status, Played a huge role. From the Paris Peace Conference to the Washington Conference at the end of 1921 and the beginning of 1922, it was the third stage of the further evolution of the British far East policy, in which Britain removed the biggest obstacle to its compromise with the United States, the far East policy of supporting Japan and suppressing the United States. By turning to the new far East policy of combining the United States with Japan, the contradiction between the United States and the United States was temporarily alleviated. In order to achieve its vested interests, which were based on the Anglo-American compromise, Britain kept its life and death at stake. Furthermore, the strategic goal of maintaining its hegemony in the world for a long time has created suitable international conditions. "Politics is a concentrated expression of economy". As an extension of internal affairs and diplomacy, it is a concentrated expression of the country's economic status in the world. The British Empire, which "won and lost its edge" in World War I, is terminally ill, no matter how shrewd its diplomats are. Nor can it change its declining trend. This is the inevitable logic of the historical development of old imperialism.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：重慶師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2009
【分類號】：K561.4

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 關(guān)勛夏;威爾遜與第一次世界大戰(zhàn)[J];軍事歷史研究;1998年03期

2 何大進;;第一次世界大戰(zhàn)時期德國的戰(zhàn)略決策與美國參戰(zhàn)[J];江西師范大學(xué)學(xué)報;1992年02期

3 王善中;;略論第一次世界大戰(zhàn)期間美日兩國在華之爭斗[J];歷史教學(xué);1984年03期

4 林云;;現(xiàn)代英國實惠外交下的對華政策[J];遼寧行政學(xué)院學(xué)報;2008年07期

5 陳淑榮;;一戰(zhàn)后英國外交政策的變化與庚款退賠[J];蘭州學(xué)刊;2008年08期

6 崔丕;;日美共同出兵西伯利亞時期的關(guān)系初探[J];社會科學(xué)戰(zhàn)線;1991年02期

7 劉笑盈;《蘭辛——石井協(xié)定》評述[J];史學(xué)月刊;1989年04期

8 鄭雪飛;第一次世界大戰(zhàn)初期的美英倫敦宣言之爭[J];史學(xué)月刊;2001年04期

9 王艷芬,汪詩明;英日同盟的建立與英國傳統(tǒng)的外交政策[J];學(xué)海;2001年05期

10 毛麗;威爾遜的“十四點”與山東問題[J];漳州師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2002年04期

，

本文編號：1668309