本文選題：十月革命　切入點(diǎn)：克倫斯基　出處：《北方論叢》2017年05期 　論文類型：期刊論文

【摘要】：十月革命以前,克倫斯基與列寧的政治角逐,以及列寧奪取和鞏固政權(quán)并領(lǐng)導(dǎo)蘇俄建設(shè)社會(huì)主義等問題,常被視為"自由民主者"與"專制獨(dú)裁者"之間的較量。實(shí)際上,十月革命前后布爾什維克并非高度集中的政黨組織,政治領(lǐng)袖的個(gè)人作用同樣至關(guān)重要。在平息"科爾尼洛夫事件"和簽訂《布列斯特和約》期間,克倫斯基與列寧的政治決策體現(xiàn)出不同的領(lǐng)導(dǎo)素質(zhì),最終對(duì)革命時(shí)期俄國(guó)的歷史發(fā)展進(jìn)程產(chǎn)生深刻的影響。
[Abstract]:Before the October Revolution, the political rivalry between Chlumsky and Lenin, as well as Lenin's seizure and consolidation of power and the leadership of Soviet Russia in building socialism, were often seen as a contest between "liberal democracies" and "autocratic dictators." Before and after the October Revolution, the Bolsheviks were not highly concentrated party organizations, and the personal role of political leaders was equally crucial. During the settlement of the Kornilov incident and the signing of the Brest Peace Treaty, The political decisions of Chlumsky and Lenin reflected different qualities of leadership, and finally had a profound impact on the historical development of Russia during the revolutionary period.
【作者單位】： 印第安納大學(xué)歷史系;吉林大學(xué)東北亞研究院;
【分類號(hào)】：K512.5

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前2條

1 丁果;;克倫斯基[J];歷史教學(xué);1984年11期

2 曲江;;權(quán)力的喪失:略論克倫斯基臨時(shí)政府的垮臺(tái)[J];西安社會(huì)科學(xué);2011年01期

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前1條

1 本報(bào)記者 張進(jìn);逝者如斯，，歷史的長(zhǎng)河留下了你的印記[N];工人日?qǐng)?bào);2000年

本文編號(hào)：1587993