本文關(guān)鍵詞： 日本戰(zhàn)爭賠償 賠償外交 舊金山和約 遠東委員會　出處：《東北師范大學(xué)》2003年博士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】： 日本戰(zhàn)爭賠償作為戰(zhàn)后處理中一個非常重要的問題，，一直受到各國政府和社會各方的關(guān)注，也是學(xué)界研究一大熱門課題。在充分借鑒和分析前人研究成果的基礎(chǔ)上，本文在研究視角上取多邊模式，以日本戰(zhàn)爭賠償為中心，對遠東委員會各個成員國的對日賠償政策及日本的戰(zhàn)爭賠償對策作多維度的分析，不但關(guān)注美國、中國、蘇聯(lián)等大國，也極力探究菲律賓、澳大利亞等遠東委員會中的中小國家在日本賠償中的地位和作用，以求對該問題作全方位的綜合研究。本文在史料的征引上將充分利用相關(guān)當(dāng)事國的文獻史料和研究著述，并加以比照，力圖實現(xiàn)史料來源的多元化。在研究方法上，除了傳統(tǒng)史學(xué)的考證方法外，本文還將采用比較研究的方法。 全文由緒論、下文和參考文獻三部分組成。緒論就國內(nèi)外學(xué)術(shù)界50多年來對日本戰(zhàn)爭賠償問題的研究狀況做一學(xué)術(shù)史的回顧，并提出本文的研究方法、資料特征、學(xué)術(shù)價值和現(xiàn)實意義。 正文分五章。第一章詳細闡述了戰(zhàn)時美國、中國的對日政策，特別是對日賠償政策的制訂過程。 第二章論述戰(zhàn)后初期美國主導(dǎo)下的拆遷賠償。由于蘇聯(lián)在日本賠償問題上挑起的“戰(zhàn)利品問題”之爭，遠東委員會各國在日本賠償問題上展開了多邊博弈，加之日本為縮減賠償而積極尋求美國的支持，這些因素成為賠償問題迅速解決的障礙。隨著美國轉(zhuǎn)變對日政策，拆遷賠償于1949年5月被終止。 第三章論述美國在推行片面對日媾和的過程中，與盟國展開關(guān)于日本賠償問題的雙邊磋商。美國通過杜勒斯-莫理遜諒解、澳新美條約換取英聯(lián)邦國家支持對日和約。對于頑強堅持對日索賠的菲律賓，美國則以勞務(wù)賠償?shù)臈l款加以籠絡(luò)。對于對日媾和磋商中出現(xiàn)的中國代表權(quán)問題，則由臺灣當(dāng)局和中國大陸分別與美、蘇進行對日和約的雙邊磋商，雙方均以爭取代表中國出席和會為首要目標，遂使賠償問題在中國對日政策中漸趨邊緣化。追隨美國片面媾和政策的日本則通 過日美雙邊磋商對和約的條款施加影響。在舊金山和會上，勞務(wù)賠償 的條款得到確認。 第四章論述舊金山和會后日本主導(dǎo)下的賠償交涉。首先在美國的 斡旋下，臺灣當(dāng)局以放棄賠償為代價簽訂了日臺和約。接著在美R共 同開發(fā)東南亞政策的指引下，日本與菲律賓等東南亞國家通過雙邊磋 商解決了賠償問題，R本以戰(zhàn)爭賠償為契機實施經(jīng)濟外交，成功地開 辟了東南亞市場。 第五章采用比較的方法，從兩個角度繼續(xù)探討日本賠償問題。一 是從盟國對德、R、意三國戰(zhàn)后處理的角度出發(fā)，通過比較德、意。 日三國的戰(zhàn)爭賠償模式以說明日本戰(zhàn)爭賠償?shù)奶厥庑�；二是從個案分 祈的角度出發(fā)，比較菲律賓與中國備自的對日索賠實踐，以說明中國 放棄賠償?shù)膹?fù)雜性。 第六章是結(jié)束語，對H本戰(zhàn)爭賠償問題作一概述。 參考文獻部分則羅列出本文征引的中、英、日文文獻論著。參考 的工聯(lián)網(wǎng)址、相關(guān)的碩（博）士論文。
[Abstract]:As one of the Japanese war compensation processing is a very important issue, has been the national government and the parties concerned, is also a hot topic of academic research. On the basis of referencing and Analysis on the results of previous studies, this paper takes the multilateral mode in the research perspective, the Japanese war compensation as the Center for analysis the dimension of war compensation countermeasure to the compensation policy on all Member States of the Commission on the Far East and Japan, not only pay attention to the United States, Chinese, the Soviet Union and other major powers, to explore Philippines, status and role of small and medium-sized countries Australia and Far East Committee in Japan in the compensation, in order to make a full range of comprehensive study of the problem. This paper in the citation of historical materials make full use of the relevant parties of historical literature and the research works, and to contrast, diversified sources. In trying to achieve the research methods, in addition to In addition, the method of comparative study is also adopted in this paper.
The full text is composed of three parts, namely, the introduction, the following and the references. The introduction makes a review of the academic history of the research on the war compensation in Japan for more than 50 years at home and abroad, and puts forward the research methods, data characteristics, academic value and practical significance of this article.
The text is divided into five chapters. The first chapter elaborates on the United States in wartime, China's policy on Japan, especially the process of formulating the policy of Japanese compensation.
The second chapter discusses the early post-war compensation for the demolition of the United States under the auspices of the Soviet Union. In Japan the issue of compensation to "loot problem", the Far East Council countries launched a multilateral game in Japanese compensation, coupled with Japan to reduce compensation and actively seek the support of the United States, these factors become the obstacle to solve the compensation problem quickly with. The transformation of American policy toward Japan, compensation for the demolition were terminated in May 1949.
The third chapter discusses the United States in the implementation of the peace process, launched on Japan for bilateral consultations with the allies. The United States by Dulles Morrison understanding, in exchange for the ANZUS treaty Commonwealth countries to support the Treaty of Philippines. For the persistence of claims against Japan, the United States to labor compensation clauses to win. For the Chinese representation problems on peace negotiations, by the Taiwan authorities and Chinese respectively, and the United States, Su of the peace treaty with Japan bilateral consultations, both sides to fight on behalf of Chinese and will attend for the first goal, then the issue of compensation in Chinese of becoming marginalized on policy. Following the United States one-sided peace the policy of Japan.
Bilateral negotiations between Japan and the United States exert influence on the terms of the peace treaty. In San Francisco and the conference, labor compensation
The terms are confirmed.
The fourth chapter deals with the settlement of compensation under the leadership of San Francisco and Japan after the meeting. First in the United States
Under the good offices, the Taiwan authorities signed the Japanese taiwan peace treaty at the cost of giving up compensation.
With the development of Southeast Asia Policy under the guidance of Japan and Philippines and other Southeast Asian countries through bilateral consultations
The merchant has solved the problem of compensation. R has implemented economic diplomacy with the opportunity of war compensation.
The Southeast Asian market was opened.
The fifth chapter uses a comparative method to continue to discuss the problem of Japanese compensation from two angles.
From the point of view of the allied countries' post-war treatment of Germany, R, and Italy, by comparing Germany and Italy.
The war compensation model in Japan and Japan shows the particularity of the Japanese war compensation; two is the case of the war.
From the point of view of praying, we compare the practice of Philippines and China's claims against Japan in order to explain China
Give up the complexity of the compensation.
The sixth chapter is the concluding remarks, and an overview of the issue of H's war compensation.
The reference part lists the citation in English, Japanese literature works.
The web site of the Federation of workers' Union (FTU), related (Bo) papers.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：東北師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：博士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2003
【分類號】：K153

【引證文獻】

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前5條

1 高凡夫;追索正義與尊嚴的艱難訴求[D];上海師范大學(xué);2006年

2 谷雪梅;冷戰(zhàn)時期美澳同盟的形成和發(fā)展（1945-1973）[D];華東師范大學(xué);2007年

3 孫瑜;舊金山對日媾和研究[D];吉林大學(xué);2008年

4 田野;戰(zhàn)后日本賠償外交研究（1945-1977）[D];吉林大學(xué);2010年

5 鄒志明;戰(zhàn)后美菲同盟的形成與演變研究（1946-1975）[D];華中師范大學(xué);2013年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 喬淑貞;張嘉t堄脛興斬本煤獻鶻簧鎇D];暨南大學(xué);2006年

2 臧揚勤;盟國在日財產(chǎn)處理問題研究[D];暨南大學(xué);2010年

本文編號：1454697