【摘要】：西方歷史學(xué)的當(dāng)代發(fā)展是涌現(xiàn)出了一批反傳統(tǒng)的批判型歷史學(xué)家。鮑斯曼、斯特耶、布瑞克、斯克里布納等人深感史學(xué)危機(jī),在不同領(lǐng)域里對(duì)傳統(tǒng)史學(xué)解釋提出挑戰(zhàn)。他們堅(jiān)持歷史客觀主義和歷史辯證法,反對(duì)一切不實(shí)的歷史解釋。他們強(qiáng)調(diào)人民的作用,否定帝王將相和文化精英創(chuàng)造歷史。他們從一個(gè)側(cè)面揭示了一個(gè)真理:歷史是人民創(chuàng)造的,文明的發(fā)展給人們帶來(lái)的必將是和諧而不是沖突,從而為遏制和防范西方擴(kuò)張?zhí)峁┝酥匾臍v史證據(jù)。
[Abstract]:The contemporary development of western history is the emergence of a group of anti-traditional critical historians. Bowsmann, Steyer, Brick, Scribner and others, who have challenged the traditional historical interpretation in different fields, deeply feel the crisis of historiography. They adhere to historical objectivism and historical dialectics and oppose all false historical interpretations. They emphasized the role of the people and denied the imperial generals and cultural elites making history. They reveal a truth from one side: history is created by the people, and the development of civilization will bring people harmony rather than conflict, thus providing important historical evidence for containment and prevention of Western expansion.
【作者單位】： 北京大學(xué)歷史學(xué)系;
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：K091

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前3條

1 高華平;建設(shè)史學(xué)批評(píng)史的奠基之作——評(píng)張三夕著《批判史學(xué)的批判》[J];浙江學(xué)刊;1993年06期

2 雷戈;史學(xué)與人學(xué)[J];重慶師院學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);1998年01期

3 ;[J];;年期

，

本文編號(hào)：2294633