發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-05-29 01:08

  本文選題：知識考古學(xué) + “荒野”�。� 參考：《河北師范大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：荒野史作為環(huán)境史這門新史學(xué)的一個(gè)次分支領(lǐng)域,其研究對象不僅僅是“荒野”內(nèi)涵的界定,更為重要的是挖掘時(shí)代背景下“荒野”內(nèi)涵轉(zhuǎn)變背后的社會歷史意蘊(yùn)。遵循上述問題意識和研究思路,文章的結(jié)構(gòu)如下:文章的緒論部分,首先闡述了運(yùn)用知識考古學(xué)的研究方法深入考察影響“荒野”內(nèi)涵發(fā)生轉(zhuǎn)變的實(shí)質(zhì)性因素,其次梳理了國內(nèi)外有關(guān)“荒野”內(nèi)涵議題的研究現(xiàn)狀并提出了文章的寫作意圖。文章從縱向維度闡述了不同時(shí)期人類對“荒野”所持觀念的轉(zhuǎn)變歷程。第一章主要追溯了殖民地時(shí)期的“荒野”內(nèi)涵。白人到達(dá)之初的美洲大陸呈現(xiàn)給歐洲移民的景象即是一片荒涼之地,是神秘與邪惡的代名詞以及需要被征服的對象;同樣在拓荒者的觀念中,荒野成為文明的障礙物;然而在諸多早期以荒野為主題的文學(xué)作品中,除了對荒野的理解帶有文化上的偏見外,一些文學(xué)作家也抒發(fā)了對荒野的欣賞。第二章論述了19世紀(jì)中后期“荒野”內(nèi)涵的演變過程及其影響因素。在浪漫主義思潮的影響下,荒野日益受到不同群體的關(guān)注,人們開始意識到荒野兼具美學(xué)和精神價(jià)值,是美國有別于其他國家的標(biāo)志;此外,艾默生和梭羅將自然的哲學(xué)認(rèn)知理念不斷滲透至文學(xué)作品中,故在改變美國人對荒野的認(rèn)知方式上發(fā)揮了關(guān)鍵性的作用;在美國內(nèi)戰(zhàn)后的十年,荒野理念已經(jīng)完全融入到強(qiáng)大的民族國家概念里,所以尊重自然和堅(jiān)持文化的殖民思想并存。第三章集中探討進(jìn)入20世紀(jì)以后,由于城市化和工業(yè)化的弊端日益暴露,人類開始重新審視文明與進(jìn)步。在現(xiàn)代荒野理念的指引下,荒野被賦予了神圣崇高的內(nèi)涵,是人類文明的解毒劑;此外,圍繞“荒野”內(nèi)涵的爭論不休,直至“荒野”一詞在法律層面上得以界定以及明確了荒野區(qū)域的限定條件和管理政策;到了21世紀(jì)初期,有關(guān)學(xué)者對“荒野”內(nèi)涵的解讀各有千秋,進(jìn)一步闡釋了“荒野”內(nèi)涵的過去和未來,有益于荒野思想的發(fā)展并更好地服務(wù)于當(dāng)代的環(huán)境生態(tài)建設(shè)。結(jié)語部分進(jìn)一步揭示出人類對“荒野”認(rèn)知程度的深化以及人類生態(tài)環(huán)境理念的革新。生態(tài)思想的變遷是社會文明的產(chǎn)物,同樣社會文明的不斷進(jìn)步也會持續(xù)作用于人類思想觀念的創(chuàng)新,就“荒野”內(nèi)涵及其社會文化意蘊(yùn)的考察不但有益于協(xié)調(diào)人與自然之間的關(guān)系,而且對我國的環(huán)境保護(hù)事業(yè),資源管理政策和生態(tài)理念發(fā)展影響深遠(yuǎn)。
[Abstract]:As a sub branch of the new history of environmental history, the history of the wilderness is not only the definition of the "wilderness", but also the social and historical implications behind the transformation of the "wilderness" under the background of the times. The structure of the article is as follows: the first part of the article: the first part of the article. This paper first expounds the substantive factors that affect the transformation of the intension of "wilderness" by using the method of knowledge archaeology, and then combs the status of the research on the subject of "wilderness" at home and abroad and puts forward the writing intention of the article. The article expounds the transformation of the concept of "wilderness" by human beings from the vertical dimension. The first chapter mainly traces the meaning of the "wilderness" in the colonial period. The American continent at the beginning of the white arrival presented to European immigrants a desolate place, a synonym of mystery and evil, and an object to be conquered; in the same sense of the pioneers, the wilderness became a barrier to civilization; however, there were many In the early literary works on the wilderness, some literary writers also expressed their appreciation of the wilderness in addition to their understanding of the wilderness, and the appreciation of the wilderness by some literary writers. The second chapter discussed the evolution and influence factors of the "wilderness" in the mid and late nineteenth Century. Under the influence of the romantic tide, the wilderness is increasingly affected by different groups. Attention, people begin to realize that the wilderness has both aesthetic and spiritual values, which is a symbol of the United States that is different from other countries; in addition, Emerson and Thoreau permeate the philosophical concepts of nature to literary works, so it plays a key role in changing the American cognitive way of the wilderness; in the ten years after the American Civil War, the wilderness is in the wilderness. The concept has fully integrated into the strong national concept of national state, so the third chapter concentrates on the existence of the colonial ideology of respect for nature and culture. After the twentieth Century, the human beings began to reexamine civilization and progress because of the increasingly exposure of the malpractices of urbanization and industrialization. Under the guidance of the modern wilderness concept, the wilderness has been endowed with God. The connotation of holy sublime is the antidote to human civilization. In addition, the debate around the "wilderness" has been debated until the word "wilderness" is defined at the legal level, and the limits and management policies of the wilderness areas have been clarified. In the early twenty-first Century, the interpretation of the connotation of "wilderness" by the relevant scholars has varied, further explained. The past and future of the intension of the "wilderness" is beneficial to the development of the wilderness thought and better serve the ecological construction of the environment in the present. The concluding part further reveals the deepening of the human cognition of the "wilderness" and the innovation of the concept of human ecological environment. The change of the ecological thought is the product of the social civilization and the same social civilization. Continuous progress will also continue to play a role in the innovation of human thoughts and ideas. The investigation of the connotation of "wilderness" and its social and cultural implications not only helps to coordinate the relationship between people and nature, but also has a deep influence on the environmental protection, resource management policy and the development of ecological concept in China.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：河北師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：K097.12

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 張梅;;自主話語的幻想與反主體的考古學(xué)——讀�？碌摹吨R考古學(xué)》[J];哲學(xué)研究;2009年02期

2 葉秀山;;論�？碌摹爸R考古學(xué)”[J];中國社會科學(xué);1990年04期

3 郝慶軍;作為研究方法的知識考古學(xué)[J];天津社會科學(xué);2004年04期

4 黃暉;;�？碌闹R考古學(xué)理論剖析[J];法國研究;2006年02期

5 曾健生;姜傳松;;“知識考古學(xué)”之批判史觀及其對教育研究的啟示[J];江西金融職工大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2006年06期

6 余乃忠;陳志良;;權(quán)力范圍與知識限度:福柯知識考古學(xué)的惡之花[J];浙江社會科學(xué);2009年01期

7 張鉑;;淺析�？碌摹吨R考古學(xué)》[J];大學(xué)英語(學(xué)術(shù)版);2010年01期

8 劉彬;;知識考古學(xué):話語與陳述[J];求索;2010年06期

9 張麗;;論福柯知識考古學(xué)及其意義[J];雞西大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2011年01期

10 艾志強(qiáng);高琳;;�？聦ΜF(xiàn)代認(rèn)識論的解構(gòu)——知識考古學(xué)視野下的科學(xué)[J];遼寧工業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會科學(xué)版);2011年01期

相關(guān)會議論文 前1條

1 于奇智;;福柯全景主義技術(shù)論及其當(dāng)代價(jià)值[A];中國現(xiàn)代外國哲學(xué)學(xué)會年會年會暨西方技術(shù)文化與后現(xiàn)代哲學(xué)學(xué)術(shù)研討會論文集[C];2004年

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前1條

1 汪民安（學(xué)者） 莫偉民（復(fù)旦大學(xué)哲學(xué)系教授） 于奇智（華南師范大學(xué)政法學(xué)院教授）;三人行，必言福柯[N];中國圖書商報(bào);2002年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前4條

1 施林林;�？隆吨R考古學(xué)》話語理論研究[D];河北大學(xué);2015年

2 魏亞茹;知識考古學(xué)視野下美國“荒野”內(nèi)涵的演變[D];河北師范大學(xué);2017年

3 謝蕙貞;知識考古學(xué)的美學(xué)維度—福柯繪畫考古學(xué)研究[D];華東師范大學(xué);2015年

4 韓寅;�？碌目茖W(xué)知識觀[D];安徽醫(yī)科大學(xué);2012年

，

本文編號：1948906