本文選題：當(dāng)代中國 + 社會轉(zhuǎn)型　； 參考：《遼寧大學(xué)》2011年碩士論文

【摘要】：解放后新中國的史學(xué)取得了巨大的進(jìn)步。但是隨著改革開放當(dāng)代社會全方位轉(zhuǎn)型,20世紀(jì)80年代初期以來史學(xué)這門學(xué)科的發(fā)展遇到了巨大的危機(jī)。這種現(xiàn)狀引起了史學(xué)界有識之士的深深憂慮,并展開了史學(xué)危機(jī)的大討論,提出了一些應(yīng)對危機(jī)的辦法。盡管21世紀(jì)史學(xué)有了新發(fā)展,但史學(xué)存在的某些問題至今依然沒有得到解決。隨著社會的發(fā)展和思想的積淀,人們將會提出更加理性的分析,同時也會給出解決“史學(xué)危機(jī)”的更好辦法。因此重新回顧這個課題還是依然很有意義的。 本文的第一部分通過對20世紀(jì)80-90年代“史學(xué)危機(jī)”現(xiàn)象的描述引出當(dāng)代“史學(xué)危機(jī)”的概念,并介紹了史學(xué)界對該現(xiàn)象的討論內(nèi)容。第二部分通過危機(jī)現(xiàn)象及其表現(xiàn)形式和類型的分析認(rèn)識得出危機(jī)的本質(zhì),并對當(dāng)代“史學(xué)危機(jī)”產(chǎn)生的背景及根源進(jìn)行了研究。第三部分介紹了史學(xué)界對當(dāng)代“史學(xué)危機(jī)”的反思及應(yīng)對措施。第四部分為筆者對“史學(xué)危機(jī)”問題的一些認(rèn)識及思考。文章結(jié)論部分是客觀評價當(dāng)代歷史學(xué)發(fā)展的狀況及研究成果,總結(jié)得失成敗與經(jīng)驗教訓(xùn)并展望史學(xué)的未來。 由于文革長期的學(xué)術(shù)封閉,學(xué)術(shù)界閉門造車現(xiàn)象嚴(yán)重。上世紀(jì)八十年代改革開放才開始步入正軌,國門剛剛打開,國內(nèi)外的學(xué)術(shù)思想交流時間也不長,中國當(dāng)時的歷史學(xué)理論嚴(yán)重缺失,國內(nèi)的學(xué)術(shù)思想還不太成熟,有很多觀點比較偏激,同時理論著作也很少,對那個時候的研究產(chǎn)生了不利的影響,所得出的結(jié)論也難免保證其客觀準(zhǔn)確性。隨著二十多年社會的發(fā)展,學(xué)術(shù)思想逐步成熟,開始步入正軌,史學(xué)研究成果以及理論著作如雨后春筍般擴(kuò)展,特別是當(dāng)代歷史學(xué)理論逐步發(fā)展,為當(dāng)代研究史學(xué)問題提供了很好的基礎(chǔ)條件。 本論文力爭采用新的思維研究方式和理論思想,并結(jié)合新的材料,力求突破當(dāng)時常規(guī)的研究思路,拓寬視野,不陷入單純的史學(xué)思維之中,以達(dá)到創(chuàng)新的目的。研究材料上除搜集當(dāng)時和歷史學(xué)發(fā)展有關(guān)的報紙評論、文章刊物以及研究論文外,還準(zhǔn)備擴(kuò)大視野,參考國內(nèi)外有關(guān)人文科目的理論著作,同時融入包括人文學(xué)科在內(nèi)的其他學(xué)科的理論知識,通過研究分析“史學(xué)危機(jī)”這一現(xiàn)象尋找其社會和思想根源,梳理當(dāng)代社會轉(zhuǎn)型及其由此引起的史學(xué)變遷的發(fā)展脈絡(luò)。為改革開放以來的社會和思想方面的認(rèn)識提供一個獨特清晰的切入點,為史學(xué)工作者總結(jié)當(dāng)代史學(xué)發(fā)展的得失成敗提供一個獨特的視角。明鑒前史可以為以后的發(fā)展建設(shè)提供有益的借鑒,為改革開放建設(shè)有中國特色的社會主義文化發(fā)展添磚加瓦,也為史學(xué)的發(fā)展做出點貢獻(xiàn),可以說這從現(xiàn)實和理論的角度來說都是具有重大意義的。
[Abstract]:Great progress was made in the historiography of New China after liberation. However, the development of historiography has encountered a great crisis since the beginning of 1980's with the reform and opening up. This situation has aroused deep concern of the people with insight in the field of history, and launched a great discussion on the crisis of historiography, and put forward some measures to deal with the crisis. Despite the new development of historiography in the 21st century, some problems still remain unresolved. With the development of society and the accumulation of ideas, people will put forward more rational analysis, and at the same time will give a better solution to the "crisis of historiography". Therefore, it is still very meaningful to review the subject again. The first part of this paper introduces the concept of "historical crisis" by describing the phenomenon of "historical crisis" in the 80-90 's of the 20th century, and introduces the discussion content of the phenomenon in the field of historiography. In the second part, the essence of the crisis is obtained through the analysis of the crisis phenomenon and its forms and types, and the background and origin of the contemporary "crisis of historiography" are studied. The third part introduces the reflection and countermeasures of the contemporary historiography crisis. The fourth part is the author's understanding and thinking about the problem of "historiography crisis". The conclusion of this paper is to objectively evaluate the development of contemporary history and its research achievements, summarize the successes and failures, experience and lessons, and look forward to the future of historiography. Due to the long-term academic closure of the Cultural Revolution, the phenomenon of closed doors in academia is serious. It was only in the 1980s that the reform and opening up began to take place on the right track. The country had just opened its doors, and the exchange of academic ideas at home and abroad was not long. The history theory of China at that time was seriously missing, and the academic thinking at home was not very mature. There are many extreme views and few theoretical works, which have a negative effect on the research at that time, and the conclusions can guarantee its objective accuracy. With the development of the society for more than 20 years, the academic thought gradually matured and began to get on the right track. The achievements of historical research and theoretical works have sprung up, especially the theory of contemporary history. It provides a good foundation for the contemporary study of historiography. This paper tries to adopt new thinking research mode and theoretical thought and combine with new materials to break through the conventional research ideas at that time widen the vision and not fall into the pure historical thinking in order to achieve the purpose of innovation. In addition to collecting newspaper reviews, articles, publications and research papers related to the development of history at that time, the research materials are also prepared to broaden their horizons and refer to theoretical works on humanities subjects at home and abroad. At the same time, it integrates the theoretical knowledge of other disciplines, including humanities, and finds its social and ideological roots by studying and analyzing the phenomenon of "historiography crisis", and combing the development of contemporary social transformation and the historical changes caused by it. It provides a unique and clear breakthrough point for the understanding of society and ideology since the reform and opening up, and a unique angle of view for historians to sum up the success or failure of the development of contemporary historiography. The pre-Ming history can provide a useful reference for future development and construction, contribute to the development of socialist culture with Chinese characteristics, and contribute to the development of historiography. It can be said from the point of view of reality and theory is of great significance.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：遼寧大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號】：K092

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 周文玖,張子俠;最近中國史學(xué)史學(xué)科的發(fā)展趨勢及展望[J];安徽史學(xué);2003年06期

2 施宣圓;要為史學(xué)鼓與呼[J];安徽史學(xué);1994年01期

3 楊善芝;;歷史學(xué)科教育應(yīng)該注重提升學(xué)生人文素養(yǎng)[J];邊疆經(jīng)濟(jì)與文化;2007年06期

4 胡維革;史學(xué)改革大思路[J];東北師大學(xué)報;1994年03期

5 何新;;古代社會史的重新認(rèn)識——從近年出版的兩部史著看當(dāng)代中國史學(xué)理論的危機(jī)[J];讀書;1986年11期

6 蘇雙碧;;重新學(xué)習(xí) 重新理解[J];福建論壇(文史哲版);1987年01期

7 龔書鐸;;從“史學(xué)危機(jī)”想到的[J];福建論壇(文史哲版);1987年01期

8 陳高華;;爭取史學(xué)理論研究的更大發(fā)展[J];福建論壇(文史哲版);1987年01期

9 王思治;;關(guān)于史學(xué)認(rèn)識論問題的幾點淺見[J];福建論壇(文史哲版);1987年01期

10 耿云志;;關(guān)于史學(xué)理論與方法問題的一點想法[J];福建論壇(文史哲版);1987年01期

，

本文編號：1860404