散論多元史觀——歷史哲學散步
發(fā)布時間:2018-04-03 05:08
本文選題:布克哈特 切入點:海登·懷特 出處:《中國社會科學院研究生院學報》2010年05期
【摘要】:西方史學和歷史哲學的革命,都源于打破史學研究定于"獨尊"的僵化和求索歷史本真的理想。多元化帶來的創(chuàng)新乃是這種革命的手段。西方肇始于古希臘的實質(zhì)主義和科學主義對于其史觀的深遠影響,使史學難覓歷史本真而長期停滯于歷史的外殼。所謂史學革命,文中提到19世紀末至20世紀以降的諸家,都是盡力擺脫實質(zhì)主義和科學主義視野的束縛,而訴諸新的哲學視野。其目的,就在于探索能深入歷史本真的歷史觀或歷史思維。
[Abstract]:The revolution of western historiography and historical philosophy originates from the inflexibility of historical research and the ideal of seeking historical truth.The innovation brought about by pluralism is the means of this revolution.Western essentialism and scientism, which began in ancient Greece, had a profound influence on its historical view, which made historiography difficult to find the historical truth and stagnant in the shell of history for a long time.The so-called historiography revolution, mentioned in the paper from the end of the 19th century to the 20th century, is to try to get rid of the shackles of the view of substance and scientism and to resort to a new philosophical field of vision.Its purpose, is to explore the historical view or historical thinking that can go deep into history.
【作者單位】: 中國社會科學院哲學研究所;中華外國哲學史學會;
【分類號】:K0
【相似文獻】
相關期刊論文 前10條
1 王樹人;;散論多元史觀——歷史哲學散步[J];中國社會科學院研究生院學報;2010年05期
2 陳雅s,
本文編號:1703743
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/shekelunwen/sxll/1703743.html