本文選題：米羅諾夫　切入點(diǎn)：《俄國(guó)社會(huì)史》　出處：《東北師范大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文　論文類(lèi)型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：蘇聯(lián)解體后,政府展開(kāi)了一系列大刀闊斧的改革,民主化進(jìn)程加快。隨著絕密檔案的大量公開(kāi)、西方社會(huì)史思想的傳入,俄國(guó)的歷史研究也進(jìn)入了新時(shí)期。認(rèn)識(shí)帝俄時(shí)期的歷史,是以時(shí)間的先后順序?qū)v史材料進(jìn)行編纂的傳統(tǒng)方法研究,還是像西方新史學(xué)那樣,使用新材料采用新方法在研究中尋求突破,這引起學(xué)術(shù)界長(zhǎng)期的思考探索。經(jīng)過(guò)長(zhǎng)期的反思與實(shí)踐,俄國(guó)歷史學(xué)家認(rèn)識(shí)到運(yùn)用社會(huì)學(xué)方法,即“自下而上”的方式去探究俄國(guó)歷史是非常重要且必要的。社會(huì)史研究不僅促進(jìn)了史學(xué)方法論的更新,還在一定程度上克服了史學(xué)研究的片面性,歷史不再只是透過(guò)“大人物”的意志才能展現(xiàn),其也可以通過(guò)“自下而上”的方式,以小見(jiàn)大地說(shuō)明問(wèn)題。米羅諾夫就是其中的代表人物。本文試圖以米氏《俄國(guó)社會(huì)史》為出發(fā)點(diǎn)來(lái)分析18—20世紀(jì)初帝俄時(shí)期的社會(huì)情況。本文正文共四部分。引言部分主要對(duì)國(guó)內(nèi)外史學(xué)界關(guān)于米羅諾夫的《俄國(guó)社會(huì)史》的研究現(xiàn)狀做了詳細(xì)梳理;第一部分主要介紹了米羅諾夫的生平、求學(xué)寫(xiě)作的經(jīng)歷以及對(duì)《俄國(guó)社會(huì)史》內(nèi)容的概要;第二部分介紹米羅諾夫社會(huì)史思想的源起,即俄國(guó)社會(huì)史研究的傳統(tǒng)和西方新史學(xué)思想的影響,以及米羅諾夫?qū)Ξ?dāng)代俄國(guó)社會(huì)史的反思;第三部分講述米羅諾夫《俄國(guó)社會(huì)史》的編纂特色,從《俄國(guó)社會(huì)史》的研究對(duì)象、研究范式、研究方法這三方面立論;第四部分是米羅諾夫《俄國(guó)社會(huì)史》的學(xué)術(shù)意義,表現(xiàn)在對(duì)研究領(lǐng)域的開(kāi)拓、研究主題的延展、研究理論的啟迪;結(jié)語(yǔ)部分,總結(jié)通過(guò)對(duì)《俄國(guó)社會(huì)史》的分析,使讀者了解到18—20世紀(jì)初俄國(guó)的社會(huì)現(xiàn)實(shí),進(jìn)而對(duì)本書(shū)做出客觀評(píng)價(jià)。米羅諾夫的《俄國(guó)社會(huì)史》改變了固有的“自上而下”的歷史編纂學(xué)傳統(tǒng),從社會(huì)史的角度以小見(jiàn)大地分析歷史問(wèn)題,這種研究方法在現(xiàn)代的學(xué)術(shù)研究中依然具有重要的參考價(jià)值和借鑒意義。
[Abstract]:After the collapse of the Soviet Union, the government launched a series of drastic reforms and the democratization process accelerated. The historical study of Russia has also entered a new period. To understand the history of the imperial Russia period, is it a traditional method of compiling historical materials in the order of time, or is it just like the Western new historiography? The use of new materials and new methods in search of breakthroughs in research has led to a long period of reflection and exploration in the academic community. After a long period of reflection and practice, Russian historians realized the use of sociological methods. That is, "bottom-up" approach to explore Russian history is very important and necessary. The study of social history not only promotes the updating of historical methodology, but also overcomes the one-sidedness of historical research to a certain extent. History can no longer be shown only through the will of the "big man", but also through the "bottom-up" approach. Mironov is one of the representative figures. This paper attempts to analyze the social situation in the early 18-20 century period of Russia from the point of view of Meez "Russian Social History". There are four parts in the text of this paper. The introduction is the main text of this paper. Part of the history of the domestic and foreign scholars about Mironov's "Russian Social History" research status quo has been made a detailed combing; The first part mainly introduces Mironov's life, writing experience and the summary of Russian Social History. The second part introduces the origin of Mironov's social history thought. That is, the tradition of Russian social history research and the influence of western new historiography thought, and Mironov's reflection on contemporary Russian social history. The third part describes the compilation characteristics of Mironov's Russian Social History. The 4th part is the academic significance of Mironov's Social History of Russia, which is manifested in the development of the research field and the extension of the research theme. In the conclusion part, through the analysis of the History of Russian Society, the readers can understand the social reality of Russia in the early 18-20 century. Mironov's "Russian Social History" has changed the inherent tradition of "top-down" historiography. From the perspective of social history, it can be seen from the perspective of social history that the historical problems are analyzed as a whole. This research method still has the important reference value and the reference significance in the modern academic research.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：東北師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：K091

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 尹紹偉;崔正領(lǐng);;淺析俄國(guó)村社制度的演化[J];黑龍江教育學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2011年01期

2 安·康·索科洛夫;王奇;;當(dāng)代俄羅斯史學(xué)界研究本國(guó)現(xiàn)代史的基本趨勢(shì)[J];史學(xué)史研究;2009年04期

3 劉爽;;反思與重建——當(dāng)代俄羅斯史學(xué)述論[J];世界歷史;2009年04期

4 姚海;;改革開(kāi)放30年的中國(guó)俄國(guó)史研究[J];史學(xué)月刊;2009年03期

5 劉爽;;當(dāng)代俄羅斯史學(xué)家對(duì)蘇聯(lián)史學(xué)的反思——兼論當(dāng)代俄羅斯史學(xué)走向[J];史學(xué)史研究;2008年03期

6 黃立，

本文編號(hào)：1589471