本文關(guān)鍵詞： 顧頡剛 偽《古文尚書》 王肅 鄭玄 經(jīng)今文學(xué)　出處：《史學(xué)史研究》2017年02期 　論文類型：期刊論文

【摘要】：顧頡剛1926年任廈門大學(xué)史學(xué)研究教授,承擔(dān)"經(jīng)學(xué)專書研究"課程。這是他首次承擔(dān)的課程,而且是他之后連續(xù)撰寫的《尚書》講義的開端。本文除了利用《顧頡剛?cè)匪盏挠嘘P(guān)廈門大學(xué)講義的史料以外,還利用顧頡剛的原稿和在大學(xué)發(fā)布的油印本,試圖全面梳理此次廈門大學(xué)講義的內(nèi)容。顧頡剛此次的講義,基本上只講到《偽古文尚書》的造偽和辨?zhèn)?他主要根據(jù)丁晏的說法指出《偽古文尚書》是王肅偽造的。這"王肅偽造說",顧頡剛開課時(shí)已有強(qiáng)烈反駁,現(xiàn)在看來已不成立。本文最后討論顧頡剛的"王肅偽造說"的背景和意義,以期作為對(duì)學(xué)術(shù)思想史研究的一種方法上的反思。
[Abstract]:In 1926, Gu Jiegang became a professor of historical studies at Xiamen University, taking on the course of "the study of Classics in Special Books." this is the first course he has undertaken. Moreover, it was the beginning of a series of handouts he wrote later on. In addition to the historical data collected from Gu Jie-gang 's complete works about the lectures of Xiamen University, this article also used the original manuscript of Gu Jie-gang and the mimeographed version published at the university. Trying to comprehensively comb the contents of the lecture notes of Xiamen University. Gu Jiegang's handout basically only talks about the falsification and discrimination of "pseudo-ancient prose books". He mainly pointed out according to Ding Yan that "the pseudo-ancient prose Shang Shu" was forged by Wang Su. This "Wang Su forgery theory" was strongly refuted by Gu Jiegang when he started his class. At the end of this paper, the background and significance of Gu Jiegang's "Wang Su forgery Theory" are discussed in order to reflect on the method of studying the history of academic thought.
【作者單位】： 日本福岡教育大學(xué)歷史系;
【分類號(hào)】：K092

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 劉俐娜;;從《上游集》看抗戰(zhàn)時(shí)期顧頡剛的學(xué)術(shù)活動(dòng)及思想[J];抗日戰(zhàn)爭研究;2006年03期

2 王廣州;;顧頡剛的不能之愛與天人之戰(zhàn)[J];讀書;2008年12期

3 伊人;;對(duì)顧頡剛我心懷敬意[J];編輯學(xué)刊;2011年04期

4 宗亮;;顧頡剛與李晉華的學(xué)術(shù)情誼[J];博覽群書;2012年07期

5 汪洪亮;;顧頡剛與民國時(shí)期的邊政研究[J];齊魯學(xué)刊;2013年01期

6 孫U，

本文編號(hào)：1518996