發(fā)布時間：2018-01-18 05:32

  本文關(guān)鍵詞：北朝史學考論　出處：《云南大學》2010年碩士論文　論文類型：學位論文

  更多相關(guān)文章： 北朝 歷史撰述 史學政策 修史制度 政治控制

【摘要】： 北朝史學是魏晉南北朝時期學術(shù)發(fā)展與裂變的一個重要組成部分,但以資料奇缺等種種緣故,常被治史學史者忽略。本文試圖對北朝史學作一相對全面的鳥瞰。上篇從北朝時期的史學撰述活動考述入手,在了解眾多佚史的基礎(chǔ)上,觀察其發(fā)展軌跡及階段性特征。下篇將北朝史學置于學術(shù)與政治關(guān)系背景中考察,以揭示此期史學的特質(zhì)及其在古代史學發(fā)展過程中的地位和意義。 本文認為,北朝史學起步早、發(fā)展慢,主要原因是受到政治嚴格的控制和摧殘。雖然北朝史學發(fā)展的深度和廣度與南朝史學相比略有遜色,但表現(xiàn)出獨特的視角和卓識。另外,北朝史學與現(xiàn)實政治關(guān)系密切,此期強大的君主集權(quán)勢力對史學進行全方位的控制,使北朝史學無論意識形態(tài)還是史學機構(gòu)都處于當局政府的嚴格監(jiān)管之下,因此形成官方史學與私家史學雙線發(fā)展而官方史學占據(jù)主導地位的特點。北朝官、私史學都取得巨大成就,但總體來說,官方史學的形勢不斷加強,而私家史學日趨式微。 北朝史學在君主集權(quán)下的發(fā)展特征直接影響到隋唐史學生態(tài)的形成。隋文帝開皇十三年詔令禁絕民間私撰國史和臧否人物,唐貞觀年間更建立起完備的官方史學系統(tǒng)和基本體制,這些都不同程度地繼承了北朝史學的特質(zhì)。在魏晉私家撰史風氣興盛和隋唐官方史學開始占據(jù)史學生態(tài)強勢地位之間,北朝史學是一個必不可少的過渡。
[Abstract]:The history of the Northern Dynasty is an important part of the academic development and fission in the Wei, Jin, Southern and Northern dynasties, but due to the lack of information and other reasons. This article attempts to make a relatively comprehensive bird 's-eye view of the Northern Dynasty historiography. The first part begins with the historical writing activities of the Northern Dynasty period, on the basis of understanding many lost history. The second part puts the Northern Dynasty historiography under the background of academic and political relations to reveal the characteristics of this period and its position and significance in the development of ancient historiography. This paper holds that the history of the Northern Dynasty started early and developed slowly, mainly because of the strict control and destruction of politics, although the depth and breadth of the development of the historiography of the Northern Dynasty was slightly inferior to that of the Southern Dynasty. In addition, the Northern Dynasty historiography was closely related to the reality and politics, and the powerful monarchic centralization forces carried on the omni-directional control over the historiography in this period. So that the Northern Dynasty historiography is under the strict supervision of the government regardless of ideology or historical institutions, so the formation of official historiography and private historiography dual development and official historiography occupies a dominant position. Private historiography has made great achievements, but on the whole, the situation of official historiography has been strengthened, and private historiography is declining day by day. The development characteristics of the Northern Dynasty historiography under the monarch centralization directly affected the formation of the Sui and Tang dynasties historiography ecology. During the Tang Dynasty, a complete official historiography system and basic system were established. These all inherited the characteristics of the Northern Dynasty historiography to varying degrees. Between the prosperity of the Wei and Jin dynasties private writing history and the Sui and Tang dynasties official historiography began to occupy a strong position in historiography ecology, the Northern Dynasty historiography is an essential transition.
【學位授予單位】：云南大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2010
【分類號】：K092

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 高賢棟;;北朝宗族譜牒述論[J];北方論叢;2007年05期

2 龐天佑;論魏收的門閥士族思想[J];常德師范學院學報(社會科學版);2003年04期

3 徐中原;;20世紀以來《水經(jīng)注》研究綜述[J];湖南文理學院學報(社會科學版);2008年05期

4 侯娟穎;;《洛陽伽藍記》創(chuàng)作背景及動機淺論[J];太原城市職業(yè)技術(shù)學院學報;2008年01期

5 陳橋驛;酈道元生平考[J];地理學報;1988年03期

6 華林甫;論酈道元《水經(jīng)注》的地名學貢獻[J];地理研究;1998年02期

7 趙永復;酈道元生年考[J];復旦學報(社會科學版);1980年S1期

8 ;由《洛陽伽藍記》看北魏的中原法化[J];法音;1998年12期

9 賀雙非;淺論《水經(jīng)注》的歷史價值與深遠影響[J];高等函授學報(自然科學版);2003年01期

10 王薇;《十六國春秋》考略[J];古籍整理研究學刊;1993年03期

相關(guān)碩士學位論文 前2條

1 婁權(quán)鑫;北朝史官考[D];東北師范大學;2006年

2 唐如明;鄧淵《國記》與北魏國史修撰[D];蘭州大學;2008年

，

本文編號：1439677