應當重視“元學術(shù)史”的寫作
發(fā)布時間：2019-03-02 15:42
【摘要】：現(xiàn)今討論"重寫學術(shù)史"是有意義的。但討論不能局限于如何依據(jù)新出土的簡帛文獻以改寫原有的學術(shù)史,而應該進一步討論如何實現(xiàn)學術(shù)史寫作上的形式革命�；谶@一思考,應當重視"元學術(shù)史"寫作問題。確立"元學術(shù)史"是規(guī)范各專門學術(shù)史的前提。我們已出版的各類學術(shù)史,之所以缺乏特色,大多雷同,就因為缺少特定的"元學術(shù)史"來引導和規(guī)范各專門學術(shù)史的撰著;"學術(shù)"的本質(zhì)訴求決定了"學術(shù)史"之處理的對象是"知識"。"元學術(shù)史"研究對象是知識本身,而各專門學術(shù)史研究的是知識的特殊表現(xiàn)。"元學術(shù)史"與各專門學術(shù)史之研究對象從根本上講固然都可以說是研究思想,但它們各自研究思想的進路不同,"元學術(shù)史"研究的是思想化為知識,而各專門學術(shù)史研究的則是知識化的思想。知識化的思想是在思想化為知識之后才有可能,所以"元學術(shù)史"對于各種專門學術(shù)史來說具有本體地位。
[Abstract]:Today's discussion of "rewriting academic History" makes sense. However, the discussion should not be limited to how to rewrite the original academic history according to the newly unearthed documents, but also to further discuss how to realize the formal revolution in the writing of academic history. Based on this thinking, we should pay attention to the writing of Meta-academic History. The establishment of "meta-academic history" is the premise of standardizing the special academic history. We have published all kinds of academic history, most of the lack of characteristics, most of the same, because of the lack of a specific "meta-academic history" to guide and standardize the writing of various special academic history; The essence of "academic" determines that the object of "academic history" is "knowledge". " The research object of meta-academic history is knowledge itself, and the special manifestation of knowledge is studied by each special academic history. Although both the Yuan academic History and the research objects of each specialized academic history can be said to be thought of research fundamentally, they have different approaches to the study of their thoughts, and the study of the History of Yuan academic Studies is about the transformation of thought into knowledge. What each specialized academic history studies is the intellectual thought. The thought of intellectualization is only possible after the thought is transformed into knowledge, so "meta-academic history" has the Noumenon status for all kinds of special academic history.
【作者單位】： 蘇州大學哲學系;
【分類號】：C09
，
本文編號：2433192
[Abstract]:Today's discussion of "rewriting academic History" makes sense. However, the discussion should not be limited to how to rewrite the original academic history according to the newly unearthed documents, but also to further discuss how to realize the formal revolution in the writing of academic history. Based on this thinking, we should pay attention to the writing of Meta-academic History. The establishment of "meta-academic history" is the premise of standardizing the special academic history. We have published all kinds of academic history, most of the lack of characteristics, most of the same, because of the lack of a specific "meta-academic history" to guide and standardize the writing of various special academic history; The essence of "academic" determines that the object of "academic history" is "knowledge". " The research object of meta-academic history is knowledge itself, and the special manifestation of knowledge is studied by each special academic history. Although both the Yuan academic History and the research objects of each specialized academic history can be said to be thought of research fundamentally, they have different approaches to the study of their thoughts, and the study of the History of Yuan academic Studies is about the transformation of thought into knowledge. What each specialized academic history studies is the intellectual thought. The thought of intellectualization is only possible after the thought is transformed into knowledge, so "meta-academic history" has the Noumenon status for all kinds of special academic history.
【作者單位】： 蘇州大學哲學系;
【分類號】：C09
，
本文編號：2433192
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/shekelunwen/shgj/2433192.html
最近更新
教材專著
