家庭社會經(jīng)濟(jì)地位、教養(yǎng)方式與孩子學(xué)業(yè)成績
發(fā)布時間：2019-02-09 16:47
【摘要】：在現(xiàn)代社會中,教育作為代際流動的中介,學(xué)業(yè)成績是看作孩子未來經(jīng)濟(jì)狀況的重要指標(biāo),教育獲得是影響社會流動的最重要的機(jī)制之一。更高的社會階層的父母的孩子要比具有較低社會階層的父母的孩子更能在學(xué)校取得成功,這其中的機(jī)制是如何?本文使用中國教育追蹤調(diào)查(CEPS)基線調(diào)查數(shù)據(jù)檢驗(yàn)了中產(chǎn)階層和勞工階層教養(yǎng)方式,一定程度上驗(yàn)證了 Annette Lareau提出的中產(chǎn)階層家庭的教養(yǎng)方式稱為"協(xié)作培養(yǎng)"(concerted cultivation),工人階層的教養(yǎng)稱作"順其自然的成長"(natural growth)理論,但在語言使用上中產(chǎn)階層與勞工階層并無差異。本文進(jìn)一步分析了家長這種"協(xié)作培養(yǎng)"方式是家長自己父母給他們的環(huán)境造成的這種教養(yǎng)下一代的方式,還是后天因其所從事職業(yè)、自身教育水平影響的下一代教養(yǎng)方式。研究發(fā)現(xiàn),父母的教養(yǎng)方式更多與父母自身后致因素(包括職業(yè)、教育程度等)有關(guān),不論在中產(chǎn)階層還是勞工階層,父母的家長教養(yǎng)方式較少與自己原生家庭有密切關(guān)系,更多與自身所處的社會經(jīng)濟(jì)地位有關(guān)系。"協(xié)作培養(yǎng)"方式是具有"學(xué)習(xí)效應(yīng)"的,并非是一種慣習(xí)傳遞造成的。中產(chǎn)階層家庭的子女相較于勞工階層家庭子女在寫家長、補(bǔ)習(xí)班布置的作業(yè),上校外輔導(dǎo)班(與課業(yè)有關(guān))時間上要多與勞工階層。家長通過協(xié)作培養(yǎng)教養(yǎng)方式完成了孩子學(xué)業(yè)成績的分化,這在一定程度上揭示了社會階層再生產(chǎn)的機(jī)制。父母不需要用明了的方式讓孩子有教育和職業(yè)目標(biāo),只要使得價值理念深入孩子生活,自然而然完成學(xué)術(shù)領(lǐng)域目標(biāo)。這種家庭環(huán)境影響下,形成了中產(chǎn)階層傳遞優(yōu)勢,而勞工階層傳遞劣勢這種再生產(chǎn)機(jī)制。
[Abstract]:In modern society, education is the intermediary of intergenerational mobility, academic achievement is regarded as an important indicator of children's future economic situation, and education acquisition is one of the most important mechanisms affecting social mobility. What is the mechanism by which a child of a higher social class parent can be more successful in school than a child with a lower social class parent? This paper uses the (CEPS) baseline survey data of the China Education tracking Survey to test the upbringing patterns of the middle class and the working class. To some extent, it verifies that the upbringing of middle class families proposed by Annette Lareau is called "cooperative cultivation" (concerted cultivation),. The working-class upbringing is called the "let it go" (natural growth) theory, but in language use there is no difference between the middle class and the working class. This paper further analyzes whether the "cooperative cultivation" of parents is the way of bringing up the next generation because of their own parents' environment, or whether it is the way of the next generation which is influenced by their occupation and their own level of education. The study found that the parenting style of parents is more related to their own factors (including occupation, level of education, etc.). Whether in the middle class or the working class, parents' parenting style is less closely related to their native family. It has more to do with its social and economic status. " Cooperative cultivation is a learning effect, not a habit transfer. The children of middle class families are more likely to work with the working class than their working class children in writing homework for parents, cram schools, and attending outside classes (related to schoolwork). Parents have completed the differentiation of their children's academic achievement through cooperative cultivation and upbringing, which to some extent reveals the mechanism of social stratum reproduction. Parents do not need to make their children have educational and career goals in a clear way, as long as the values are embedded in their children's lives, they naturally accomplish academic goals. Under the influence of this family environment, the middle-class transfer advantage, and the labor class transfer inferiority this reproduction mechanism.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：上海社會科學(xué)院
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：C913.1
本文編號：2419170
[Abstract]:In modern society, education is the intermediary of intergenerational mobility, academic achievement is regarded as an important indicator of children's future economic situation, and education acquisition is one of the most important mechanisms affecting social mobility. What is the mechanism by which a child of a higher social class parent can be more successful in school than a child with a lower social class parent? This paper uses the (CEPS) baseline survey data of the China Education tracking Survey to test the upbringing patterns of the middle class and the working class. To some extent, it verifies that the upbringing of middle class families proposed by Annette Lareau is called "cooperative cultivation" (concerted cultivation),. The working-class upbringing is called the "let it go" (natural growth) theory, but in language use there is no difference between the middle class and the working class. This paper further analyzes whether the "cooperative cultivation" of parents is the way of bringing up the next generation because of their own parents' environment, or whether it is the way of the next generation which is influenced by their occupation and their own level of education. The study found that the parenting style of parents is more related to their own factors (including occupation, level of education, etc.). Whether in the middle class or the working class, parents' parenting style is less closely related to their native family. It has more to do with its social and economic status. " Cooperative cultivation is a learning effect, not a habit transfer. The children of middle class families are more likely to work with the working class than their working class children in writing homework for parents, cram schools, and attending outside classes (related to schoolwork). Parents have completed the differentiation of their children's academic achievement through cooperative cultivation and upbringing, which to some extent reveals the mechanism of social stratum reproduction. Parents do not need to make their children have educational and career goals in a clear way, as long as the values are embedded in their children's lives, they naturally accomplish academic goals. Under the influence of this family environment, the middle-class transfer advantage, and the labor class transfer inferiority this reproduction mechanism.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：上海社會科學(xué)院
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：C913.1
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 楊中超;;教育擴(kuò)招促進(jìn)了代際流動?[J];社會;2016年06期
2 李忠路;邱澤奇;;家庭背景如何影響兒童學(xué)業(yè)成就?——義務(wù)教育階段家庭社會經(jīng)濟(jì)地位影響差異分析[J];社會學(xué)研究;2016年04期
3 劉在花;;父母教育期望對中學(xué)生學(xué)習(xí)投入影響機(jī)制的研究[J];中國特殊教育;2015年09期
4 劉保中;張?jiān)略?李建新;;家庭社會經(jīng)濟(jì)地位與青少年教育期望:父母參與的中介作用[J];北京大學(xué)教育評論;2015年03期
5 葉曉陽;丁延慶;;擴(kuò)張的中國高等教育:教育質(zhì)量與社會分層[J];社會;2015年03期
6 唐俊超;;輸在起跑線——再議中國社會的教育不平等(1978-2008)[J];社會學(xué)研究;2015年03期
7 劉保中;張?jiān)略?李建新;;社會經(jīng)濟(jì)地位、文化觀念與家庭教育期望[J];青年研究;2014年06期
8 楊春華;;農(nóng)村家庭的教育期望與策略安排——基于蘇北農(nóng)村調(diào)查的分析[J];中國青年研究;2014年04期
9 李春玲;;教育不平等的年代變化趨勢(1940-2010)——對城鄉(xiāng)教育機(jī)會不平等的再考察[J];社會學(xué)研究;2014年02期
10 王甫勤;時怡雯;;家庭背景、教育期望與大學(xué)教育獲得基于上海市調(diào)查數(shù)據(jù)的實(shí)證研究[J];社會;2014年01期
，本文編號：2419170
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/shekelunwen/shgj/2419170.html
最近更新
教材專著
