【摘要】：中國(guó)哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)研究中不斷提升的理論自由度與學(xué)術(shù)評(píng)價(jià)的學(xué)科專業(yè)化之間事實(shí)上陷入到了一對(duì)難以相互潤(rùn)合的制肘,而這種制肘客觀上逐漸衍生了中國(guó)哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)發(fā)展中的諸多新困惑,如學(xué)風(fēng)規(guī)范等系列命題。面對(duì)這些新困惑,我們絕不能單純寄望于依賴道德批判去單向抽象破題,而是要深入這些新困惑內(nèi)部理性挖掘其潛在機(jī)理,進(jìn)而剖析出其背后真實(shí)難點(diǎn),以客觀理性態(tài)度來具體糾偏中國(guó)哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)學(xué)術(shù)發(fā)展中的諸項(xiàng)困難,從而擯棄毫無意義的道德審判心理,走出學(xué)術(shù)批判中的倫理性思維左右困局。本文就中國(guó)哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)學(xué)風(fēng)規(guī)范議題中的三大關(guān)鍵詞:"學(xué)術(shù)"、"學(xué)界"和"學(xué)者",與中國(guó)科學(xué)院李醒民教授提出的"學(xué)術(shù)斷然拒絕平庸"、"學(xué)界要以學(xué)術(shù)為中心和導(dǎo)向"等論點(diǎn)展開商榷。
[Abstract]:The increasing degree of theoretical freedom in the research of Chinese philosophy and social sciences and the discipline specialization of academic evaluation are in fact trapped in a pair of constraints which are difficult to combine with each other. And this kind of restriction has gradually derived many new puzzles in the development of Chinese philosophy and social sciences, such as the rules of study style and other series of propositions. In the face of these new puzzles, we must not simply rely on moral criticism to solve problems in a one-way abstract way, but rather dig into the underlying mechanism of these new puzzles, and then analyze the real difficulties behind them. The objective and rational attitude is to correct the difficulties in the academic development of Chinese philosophy and social sciences so as to abandon the meaningless moral judgment psychology and get out of the dilemma caused by the ethical thinking in academic criticism. This paper deals with the three key words in the study style of Chinese philosophy and social sciences: "academic", "academic" and "scholar", and "academic rejection of mediocrity" put forward by Professor Li Xingmin of the Chinese Academy of Sciences. Academic circles should focus on academicism and guide, and so on.
【作者單位】： 東北師范大學(xué)農(nóng)村教育研究所;
【分類號(hào)】：C03
，

本文編號(hào)：2380217