【摘要】：本研究以Gati,Krausz和Osipow(2007)提出的新職業(yè)決策困難模型為基礎(chǔ),結(jié)合自卑和應(yīng)對效能來考察畢業(yè)生職業(yè)決策困難的特點,并探討職業(yè)決策困難與自卑、應(yīng)對效能之間的關(guān)系。 采用Gati等編制的《職業(yè)決策困難量表》、蒙家宏編制的《畢業(yè)生自卑量表》、童輝杰編制的《應(yīng)對效能量表》對湖北省武漢市部分高校畢業(yè)生進行問卷調(diào)查。研究結(jié)果顯示: 1.整體上畢業(yè)生職業(yè)決策困難得分并不高,三個分量表中從高到低依次是焦慮分量表、消極觀念分量表、自我認(rèn)同分量表; 2.《職業(yè)決策困難量表》所測定的畢業(yè)生職業(yè)決策困難在學(xué)校、專業(yè)、性別、是否做過兼職、是否接受過職業(yè)輔導(dǎo)方面存在顯著性差異; 3.對職業(yè)決策困難、自卑、應(yīng)對效能進行兩兩相關(guān)分析,結(jié)果發(fā)現(xiàn):三者相互之間存在顯著相關(guān); 4.回歸分析結(jié)果表明:應(yīng)對效能在自卑對職業(yè)決策困難的影響上不存在中介效應(yīng);進一步分別以自卑、應(yīng)對效能各個因子做為自變量,職業(yè)決策困難總分為因變量進行多元逐步回歸分析。結(jié)果發(fā)現(xiàn):自卑量表中個性自卑、學(xué)習(xí)自卑、交往自卑維度進入了回歸方程,并且能夠預(yù)測職業(yè)決策困難的36.2%;應(yīng)對效能中自信程度、勝任力進入了回歸方程,并且能夠預(yù)測職業(yè)決策困難的13.4%。 5.為進一步探討自卑、應(yīng)對效能對職業(yè)決策困難的具體作用關(guān)系,以自卑、應(yīng)對效能為自變量,職業(yè)決策困難為因變量,進行雙因素方差分析。結(jié)果發(fā)現(xiàn):自卑、應(yīng)對效能對職業(yè)決策困難的影響存在顯著的交互效應(yīng);再進一步做事后檢驗發(fā)現(xiàn),簡單效應(yīng)顯著;而且,在不同的自卑水平下,應(yīng)對效能對職業(yè)決策困難的影響趨勢有很大的變化;在不同應(yīng)對效能水平下,自卑對職業(yè)決策困難的影響趨勢變化不大。
[Abstract]:Based on the new model of career decision making difficulties proposed by Gati,Krausz and Osipow (2007), this study investigates the characteristics of career decision making difficulties of graduates combined with inferiority complex and coping efficiency, and probes into the relationship between career decision-making difficulties, inferiority complex and coping efficiency. A questionnaire survey was conducted on some college graduates in Wuhan, Hubei Province, using the scale of career Decision-making difficulties developed by Gati et al, the scale of Self-abasement of graduates compiled by Meng Jiahong, and the scale of coping efficiency compiled by Tong Huijie. The results show that: 1. On the whole, the score of career decision making difficulties of graduates is not high. In the three sub-tables, anxiety subscale, negative concept component table, self-identity component table are in order from high to low. 2.There were significant differences in school, major, sex, whether part-time or not, whether or not the graduates had received vocational guidance. 3. The scale of career decision difficulties measured by the scale had significant differences in school, major, gender, whether or not to do part-time work, whether or not they had received vocational guidance. 3. The results show that there is a significant correlation between them; 4. The results of regression analysis showed that coping efficacy had no intermediary effect on the influence of inferiority complex on career decision making difficulty; Furthermore, the factors of inferiority complex and coping efficacy were taken as independent variables, and the total score of career decision making difficulties was taken as dependent variable to carry out multivariate stepwise regression analysis. The results showed that the dimensions of personality inferiority complex, learning inferiority complex and communication inferiority complex entered the regression equation, and they could predict 36.2 difficult career decision making. Confidence and competence in coping efficacy entered regression equation and could predict 13.4difficult career decision making. 5. In order to further explore the specific relationship between inferiority complex and coping efficacy on career decision making difficulty, the analysis of variance of two factors was carried out with inferiority complex, coping efficiency as independent variable and career decision difficulty as dependent variable. The results showed that the self-abasement and coping efficacy had significant interaction effect on the difficulty of career decision making, and the simple effect was significant after further examination. Moreover, under different inferiority level, coping efficacy has great influence on career decision making difficulty, while under different coping efficiency level, the influence trend of inferiority complex on career decision making difficulty has little change.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華中科技大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號】：C913.2

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前7條

1 張繼如;大學(xué)生自卑心理及其對策[J];內(nèi)蒙古大學(xué)學(xué)報(人文社會科學(xué)版);2000年S1期

2 龍立榮,彭永新;國外職業(yè)決策困難研究及其啟示[J];人類工效學(xué);2000年04期

3 李莉,馬劍虹;畢業(yè)生職業(yè)決策困難及其影響因素研究[J];人類工效學(xué);2004年01期

4 童輝杰;應(yīng)對效能:問卷的編制及理論模型的建構(gòu)[J];心理學(xué)報;2005年03期

5 彭永新;龍立榮;;國外職業(yè)決策理論模式的研究進展[J];教育研究與實驗;2000年05期

6 杜睿;龍立榮;;大學(xué)生職業(yè)決策困難問卷的初步研究[J];中國臨床心理學(xué)雜志;2006年03期

7 李西營;;大學(xué)生職業(yè)決策困難問卷的修訂[J];中國臨床心理學(xué)雜志;2007年05期

，

本文編號：2355553