【摘要】：正我的題目叫"社會(huì)學(xué)的‘中國(guó)知識(shí)’",可能有人會(huì)反問(wèn):已經(jīng)有中國(guó)問(wèn)題、中國(guó)理論,中國(guó)實(shí)踐、中國(guó)經(jīng)驗(yàn)這些概念,干嘛再弄個(gè)"中國(guó)知識(shí)"?這段時(shí)間有三四年了,我基本上沒有寫多少東西,不過(guò),每年要看很多的評(píng)審課題、很多的評(píng)審材料,看下來(lái)有一個(gè)感覺非常不好:所有的東西,99%研究的都是中國(guó)問(wèn)題,幾乎沒有人研究外國(guó)問(wèn)題;而關(guān)于中國(guó)問(wèn)題的研究,關(guān)鍵也都不是用中國(guó)話語(yǔ)來(lái)研究,不是用中國(guó)人的思想在研究,也不是用中國(guó)的知識(shí)在研究。我們
[Abstract]:My title is "Chinese knowledge in Sociology." some people may ask: there are already Chinese problems, Chinese theory, Chinese practice, and Chinese experience. Why do we have another "Chinese knowledge"?. It's been three or four years, and I haven't written much about it. However, every year I have to look at a lot of review topics, a lot of review materials, and it feels very bad to look at it: all things, 99 percent of the research is about China. Few people study foreign issues; The key to the study of China is not to study with Chinese discourse, not with Chinese thought, nor with Chinese knowledge. we
【作者單位】： 浙江大學(xué)公共管理學(xué)院社會(huì)學(xué)系;
【分類號(hào)】：C91

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 薛涌;;小心什么樣的“西方詭辯術(shù)”?[J];中國(guó)新聞周刊;2008年13期

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前1條

1 記者 夏靜 光明網(wǎng)記者 張晶;社科專家研討“中國(guó)實(shí)踐和中國(guó)話語(yǔ)”[N];光明日?qǐng)?bào);2014年

，

本文編號(hào)：2316094