社會(huì)排斥歸因?qū)?nèi)隱攻擊的影響
發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-10-13 07:13
【摘要】：人們?cè)谑艿缴鐣?huì)排斥后往往會(huì)尋找被排斥的原因，而不同的歸因會(huì)使人們產(chǎn)生不同的社會(huì)態(tài)度，隨之影響人們的相關(guān)行為。本研究以遼寧師范大學(xué)的在校學(xué)生為研究對(duì)象，使用網(wǎng)絡(luò)投球游戲啟動(dòng)排斥感，根據(jù)Sara Banki的研究編制了社會(huì)排斥的歸因問卷，并采用三種不同的內(nèi)隱攻擊測量方式考察了社會(huì)排斥歸因?qū)?nèi)隱攻擊的影響。 實(shí)驗(yàn)一采用了攻擊性詞匯偏好的方法，探討了社會(huì)排斥歸因?qū)?nèi)隱攻擊的影響。結(jié)果表明：（1）情境類型對(duì)內(nèi)隱攻擊有顯著影響，排斥情境中的內(nèi)隱攻擊得分顯著高于接納情境；（2）歸因類型對(duì)內(nèi)隱攻擊沒有顯著的影響；（3）情境類型與歸因類型的交互作用顯著，當(dāng)個(gè)體進(jìn)行能力歸因時(shí)，排斥情境中的內(nèi)隱攻擊得分顯著高于接納情境。 實(shí)驗(yàn)二采用了攻擊性詞干補(bǔ)筆的方法，探討了社會(huì)排斥歸因?qū)?nèi)隱攻擊的影響。結(jié)果表明：（1）情境類型對(duì)內(nèi)隱攻擊有顯著影響，排斥情境中的總體內(nèi)隱攻擊得分顯著高于接納情境，其中排斥情境中的身體內(nèi)隱攻擊得分與言語內(nèi)隱攻擊得分均顯著高于接納情境；（2）歸因類型對(duì)內(nèi)隱攻擊有顯著的影響，意圖歸因的總體內(nèi)隱攻擊得分顯著高于能力歸因，能力歸因的總體內(nèi)隱攻擊得分顯著低于綜合歸因，，其中意圖歸因的言語內(nèi)隱攻擊得分顯著高于能力歸因，能力歸因的言語內(nèi)隱攻擊得分顯著低于綜合歸因；（3）情境類型與歸因類型交互作用顯著，當(dāng)個(gè)體進(jìn)行能力歸因與綜合歸因時(shí)，排斥情境中的總體內(nèi)隱攻擊得分顯著高于接納情境，但在身體內(nèi)隱攻擊得分與言語內(nèi)隱攻擊得分上情境類型與歸因類型交互作用均不顯著。 實(shí)驗(yàn)三采用了內(nèi)隱聯(lián)想測驗(yàn)的方法，探討了社會(huì)排斥歸因?qū)?nèi)隱攻擊的影響。結(jié)果表明：（1）情境類型對(duì)內(nèi)隱攻擊有顯著影響，且排斥情境組的內(nèi)隱攻擊程度顯著高于接納情境組；（2）歸因類型對(duì)內(nèi)隱攻擊有顯著影響，且意圖歸因的內(nèi)隱攻擊程度顯著高于能力歸因；（3）情境類型與歸因類型的交互作用顯著，當(dāng)個(gè)體進(jìn)行意圖歸因時(shí)，排斥情境中的內(nèi)隱攻擊程度顯著高于接納情境。 綜上所述，本研究得出以下結(jié)論： 1．不同情境類型對(duì)個(gè)體的內(nèi)隱攻擊程度有顯著的影響，相對(duì)于社會(huì)接納情境，社會(huì)排斥情境中的內(nèi)隱攻擊程度更強(qiáng)； 2．不同歸因類型對(duì)個(gè)體的內(nèi)隱攻擊程度有顯著的影響，意圖歸因的內(nèi)隱攻擊程度顯著高于能力歸因； 3．情境類型與歸因類型的交互作用顯著，且當(dāng)個(gè)體進(jìn)行能力歸因、意圖歸因時(shí)，相對(duì)于社會(huì)接納情境，社會(huì)排斥情境中的內(nèi)隱攻擊程度均更強(qiáng)。
[Abstract]:People often look for the reasons of exclusion after being excluded, and different attribution will make people have different social attitudes, and then affect people's related behavior. This study takes the students of Liaoning normal University as the research object, uses the network pitching game to start the rejection, according to the research of Sara Banki, compiled the attribution questionnaire of social exclusion. The effects of social exclusion attribution on implicit attack were investigated by using three different implicit attack measurement methods. In experiment 1, the influence of social exclusion attribution on implicit aggression was investigated by using aggressive lexical preference. The results showed that: (1) situation type had significant influence on implicit attack, and the score of implicit attack in exclusion situation was significantly higher than that in acceptance situation, (2) attribution type had no significant effect on implicit attack. (3) the interaction between situational type and attribution type was significant, and the implicit attack score in exclusion context was significantly higher than that in receptive situation. In experiment two, the effect of social exclusion attribution on implicit aggression was investigated by using the method of aggressive stem complement. The results showed that: (1) the type of situation had a significant effect on implicit attack, and the score of total implicit attack in exclusion situation was significantly higher than that in acceptance situation. The score of body implicit attack and speech implicit attack in exclusion situation were significantly higher than that in acceptance situation; (2) Attribution type had significant influence on implicit attack, and the total implicit attack score of intention attribution was significantly higher than that of ability attribution. The total implicit attack score of ability attribution is significantly lower than that of comprehensive attribution, in which the score of intention attribution is significantly higher than that of ability attribution, and the score of ability attribution is significantly lower than that of comprehensive attribution. (3) the interaction between situational type and attributional type was significant. When individuals were attributing ability and comprehensive attribution, the score of total implicit attack in exclusion situation was significantly higher than that in acceptance situation. However, the interaction between situational type and attribution type was not significant in the score of body implicit attack and verbal implicit attack. Experiment 3 uses implicit association test to explore the effect of social exclusion attribution on implicit aggression. The results showed that: (1) situation type had significant influence on implicit attack, and the degree of implicit attack in exclusion situation group was significantly higher than that in acceptance situation group, (2) attribution type had significant influence on implicit attack. The implicit attack degree of intention attribution is significantly higher than that of ability attribution; (3) the interaction between situation type and attribution type is significant. When individuals make intention attribution, the degree of implicit attack in exclusion situation is significantly higher than that in acceptance situation. To sum up, this study draws the following conclusions: 1. Different types of situations have a significant impact on the degree of implicit aggression, compared with social acceptance situations, the degree of implicit aggression in social exclusion situations is stronger; 2. 2. Different attribution types have significant influence on the degree of implicit attack, the implicit attack degree of intention attribution is significantly higher than that of ability attribution; 3. The interaction between situation type and attribution type is significant. And when individuals attribute ability and intention, the degree of implicit attack in social exclusion is stronger than that in social acceptance.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：遼寧師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：C912.6
本文編號(hào)：2267743
[Abstract]:People often look for the reasons of exclusion after being excluded, and different attribution will make people have different social attitudes, and then affect people's related behavior. This study takes the students of Liaoning normal University as the research object, uses the network pitching game to start the rejection, according to the research of Sara Banki, compiled the attribution questionnaire of social exclusion. The effects of social exclusion attribution on implicit attack were investigated by using three different implicit attack measurement methods. In experiment 1, the influence of social exclusion attribution on implicit aggression was investigated by using aggressive lexical preference. The results showed that: (1) situation type had significant influence on implicit attack, and the score of implicit attack in exclusion situation was significantly higher than that in acceptance situation, (2) attribution type had no significant effect on implicit attack. (3) the interaction between situational type and attribution type was significant, and the implicit attack score in exclusion context was significantly higher than that in receptive situation. In experiment two, the effect of social exclusion attribution on implicit aggression was investigated by using the method of aggressive stem complement. The results showed that: (1) the type of situation had a significant effect on implicit attack, and the score of total implicit attack in exclusion situation was significantly higher than that in acceptance situation. The score of body implicit attack and speech implicit attack in exclusion situation were significantly higher than that in acceptance situation; (2) Attribution type had significant influence on implicit attack, and the total implicit attack score of intention attribution was significantly higher than that of ability attribution. The total implicit attack score of ability attribution is significantly lower than that of comprehensive attribution, in which the score of intention attribution is significantly higher than that of ability attribution, and the score of ability attribution is significantly lower than that of comprehensive attribution. (3) the interaction between situational type and attributional type was significant. When individuals were attributing ability and comprehensive attribution, the score of total implicit attack in exclusion situation was significantly higher than that in acceptance situation. However, the interaction between situational type and attribution type was not significant in the score of body implicit attack and verbal implicit attack. Experiment 3 uses implicit association test to explore the effect of social exclusion attribution on implicit aggression. The results showed that: (1) situation type had significant influence on implicit attack, and the degree of implicit attack in exclusion situation group was significantly higher than that in acceptance situation group, (2) attribution type had significant influence on implicit attack. The implicit attack degree of intention attribution is significantly higher than that of ability attribution; (3) the interaction between situation type and attribution type is significant. When individuals make intention attribution, the degree of implicit attack in exclusion situation is significantly higher than that in acceptance situation. To sum up, this study draws the following conclusions: 1. Different types of situations have a significant impact on the degree of implicit aggression, compared with social acceptance situations, the degree of implicit aggression in social exclusion situations is stronger; 2. 2. Different attribution types have significant influence on the degree of implicit attack, the implicit attack degree of intention attribution is significantly higher than that of ability attribution; 3. The interaction between situation type and attribution type is significant. And when individuals attribute ability and intention, the degree of implicit attack in social exclusion is stronger than that in social acceptance.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：遼寧師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：C912.6
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前8條
1 曾率;賀嶺峰;高旭辰;;歸因引導(dǎo)對(duì)社會(huì)態(tài)度改變的影響[J];心理研究;2010年02期
2 周林剛;論社會(huì)排斥[J];社會(huì);2004年03期
3 葉茂林,楊治良;未成年人歸因的內(nèi)隱特征與攻擊行為[J];心理科學(xué);2004年04期
4 周穎;劉俊升;;雙重攻擊模型的實(shí)證研究[J];心理科學(xué);2009年01期
5 謝熹瑤;畢重增;羅躍嘉;;積極情景線索對(duì)內(nèi)隱攻擊性的影響[J];心理科學(xué);2010年01期
6 楊治良，劉素珍;“攻擊性行為”社會(huì)認(rèn)知的實(shí)驗(yàn)研究[J];心理科學(xué);1996年02期
7 朱嬋媚;宮火良;鄭希付;;未成年人內(nèi)隱攻擊性特征的實(shí)驗(yàn)研究[J];心理學(xué)探新;2006年02期
8 魏曉娟;;欺負(fù)卷入兒童的歸因特點(diǎn)及教育建議[J];中小學(xué)心理健康教育;2007年03期
本文編號(hào)：2267743
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/shekelunwen/shgj/2267743.html
最近更新
教材專著
