機械設(shè)備的國際比較及方法研究
發(fā)布時間：2018-09-06 07:17
【摘要】：國際比較項目(ICP)是進行國際經(jīng)濟比較的活動,由聯(lián)合國統(tǒng)計委員會、世界銀行等國際組織牽頭組織實施的。2011年一輪ICP活動是目前為止參與國家最多的一次,大約200個國家參與其中,而中國也全面參與了這一輪的國際經(jīng)濟比較中。中國的積極參加不僅是國際比較項目走向成熟的需要,也有助于中國經(jīng)濟長足穩(wěn)定發(fā)展。然而,國內(nèi)對于國際比較項目的認識與研究還比較薄弱,這也嚴重影響了中國參與國際比較項目活動的能力。 機械設(shè)備的比較在國際比較項目中是一大難題,還存在很多問題需要去解決。本文以此為研究對象,希望通過對該領(lǐng)域國際前沿研究的仔細分析,探討機械設(shè)備國際比較的重點與難點,也希望通過本文的討論,對中國參與該項目國際比較有一定的啟示。本文的基本結(jié)構(gòu)如下： 第一章,緒論。主要闡述了本文的研究背景、研究內(nèi)容、選題意義和本文的結(jié)構(gòu)安排。 第二章,機械設(shè)備國際比較的基本范疇。主要討論了機械設(shè)備國際比較的四個基本流程,闡述了四個基本流程的工作內(nèi)容和所涉及的工作人員,并且評價了各個流程在整個過程中的地位和作用,對機械設(shè)備的國際比較有一個整體的了解。 第三章,2005年一輪機械設(shè)備國際比較方法及評價。主要討論了以2005年為基期的一輪機械設(shè)備國際比較,研究這一輪比較中涉及的各種方法,并且對各個流程中涉及的方法所存在的問題也進行了相應(yīng)的研究,總結(jié)出存在的具體問題,比如對二手設(shè)備的忽視、提交的數(shù)據(jù)類型各異、問卷缺乏對來源地等的考慮等問題。 第四章,2011年新一輪機械設(shè)備國際比較的新提議及評價。在總結(jié)2005年一輪的機械設(shè)備國際比較的基礎(chǔ)上,對以2011年為基期的新一輪的機械設(shè)備國際比較提出了一定的建議。另外,在總結(jié)經(jīng)驗的基礎(chǔ)上,也對新一輪的機械設(shè)備國際比較中的創(chuàng)新進行了研究,比如采用價格因素法(Price Factor Method)計算購買力平價等。 第五章,機械設(shè)備國際比較的重點、難點分析。在上文討論的基礎(chǔ)上,對機械設(shè)備國際比較中的重點、難點問題又進行了更加深入的探討與總結(jié),比如產(chǎn)品清單的制定、設(shè)備產(chǎn)品價格數(shù)據(jù)的質(zhì)量保證、產(chǎn)品的代表性與可比性的平衡、進行多邊比較和PPP匯總所采用的方法等,總結(jié)出更加適宜的方法。 第六章,結(jié)論與展望。結(jié)論部分是對前述分析的總結(jié),主要得出幾個結(jié)論,比如要選擇跨國大品牌、采用產(chǎn)品結(jié)構(gòu)描述表等。通過對機械設(shè)備國際比較的綜合研究,展望部分提出了未來中國研究機械設(shè)備國際比較可以著手的幾個方面。 本文的主要貢獻在于：一是全面梳理了機械設(shè)備國際比較的基本流程,并且通過該項目比較的流程,簡單地了解到整個國際比較項目的基本操作流程；二是對各個流程中涉及的方法進行了詳細的討論,并且總結(jié)所存在的問題,給出了相應(yīng)的建議和措施,同時對相關(guān)問題進行了一定創(chuàng)新；三是增加了我國當前對機械設(shè)備國際比較的研究,當前中國學者只是對ICP的總體進行研究,而沒有就某一個項目進行深入的研究,因此,希望通過本文的研究能夠?qū)χ袊鴧⑴c以后的機械設(shè)備國際比較有所幫助。 當然本文還有很大的不足,由于國際比較數(shù)據(jù)獲得比較困難,所以本文缺乏具體數(shù)據(jù)的支持,會比較空泛,而且在一些方法、問題的論證或是用詞上還不是很到位,這些都需要后期的不斷改進,我也會不斷進行研究和改進。
[Abstract]:The International Comparison Program (ICP) is an international economic comparison activity led by the United Nations Statistical Commission, the World Bank and other international organizations. China's active participation is not only necessary for the maturity of international comparative projects, but also conducive to the steady development of China's economy.
The comparison of machinery and equipment is a difficult problem in the international comparison project, and there are still many problems to be solved. This paper takes this as the research object, and hopes to discuss the key and difficult points of the international comparison of machinery and equipment through the careful analysis of the international frontier research in this field. It also hopes that through the discussion of this paper, China will participate in the international comparison of the project. The basic structure of this paper is as follows:
The first chapter, introduction, mainly elaborates the research background, research content, topic significance and the structure of this paper.
Chapter two, the basic category of international comparison of machinery and equipment, mainly discusses the four basic processes of international comparison of machinery and equipment, expounds the working contents and staff involved in the four basic processes, evaluates the status and role of each process in the whole process, and has a comprehensive understanding of the international comparison of machinery and equipment.
Chapter three, the method and evaluation of the international comparison of machinery and equipment in 2005. It mainly discusses the international comparison of machinery and equipment in 2005 as the base period, studies the various methods involved in this round of comparison, and studies the problems of the methods involved in each process, sums up the specific problems, such as The neglect of second-hand equipment, the different types of data submitted, and the lack of consideration of the origin and so on.
Chapter Four: New proposals and evaluation of the new round of international comparison of machinery and equipment in 2011. On the basis of summarizing the international comparison of machinery and equipment in 2005, some suggestions are put forward for the new round of international comparison of machinery and equipment in 2011. In addition, on the basis of summarizing experience, a new round of International comparison of machinery and equipment is also made. The innovations in this paper, such as the Price Factor Method, are studied.
Chapter Five, the key and difficult points of international comparison of mechanical equipment. On the basis of the above discussion, the key and difficult problems in international comparison of mechanical equipment are further discussed and summarized, such as the formulation of product list, the quality assurance of price data of equipment products, the balance of product representativeness and comparability, and so on. A more appropriate method is summed up by edge comparison and the method of PPP summarization.
Chapter 6, conclusions and prospects. The conclusion part is a summary of the above analysis, mainly draws several conclusions, such as the choice of transnational brands, the use of product structure description tables and so on.
The main contributions of this paper are as follows: firstly, the basic process of international comparison of machinery and equipment is sorted out comprehensively, and the basic operation process of the whole international comparison project is simply understood through the process of the project comparison; secondly, the methods involved in each process are discussed in detail, and the existing problems are summarized and given. Corresponding suggestions and measures, at the same time, some innovations have been made on the related issues; Third, China has increased the current research on the international comparison of machinery and equipment. At present, Chinese scholars only study the overall ICP, but not on a certain project in-depth study, so I hope that through this study China can participate in the future. International Comparison of mechanical equipment is helpful.
Of course, there are still great shortcomings in this paper, because international comparative data is difficult to obtain, so this paper lacks specific data support, will be relatively empty, and in some methods, the problem of argument or wording is not in place, these need to be improved later, I will continue to study and improve.
【學位授予單位】：東北財經(jīng)大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：C829.2
本文編號：2225645
[Abstract]:The International Comparison Program (ICP) is an international economic comparison activity led by the United Nations Statistical Commission, the World Bank and other international organizations. China's active participation is not only necessary for the maturity of international comparative projects, but also conducive to the steady development of China's economy.
The comparison of machinery and equipment is a difficult problem in the international comparison project, and there are still many problems to be solved. This paper takes this as the research object, and hopes to discuss the key and difficult points of the international comparison of machinery and equipment through the careful analysis of the international frontier research in this field. It also hopes that through the discussion of this paper, China will participate in the international comparison of the project. The basic structure of this paper is as follows:
The first chapter, introduction, mainly elaborates the research background, research content, topic significance and the structure of this paper.
Chapter two, the basic category of international comparison of machinery and equipment, mainly discusses the four basic processes of international comparison of machinery and equipment, expounds the working contents and staff involved in the four basic processes, evaluates the status and role of each process in the whole process, and has a comprehensive understanding of the international comparison of machinery and equipment.
Chapter three, the method and evaluation of the international comparison of machinery and equipment in 2005. It mainly discusses the international comparison of machinery and equipment in 2005 as the base period, studies the various methods involved in this round of comparison, and studies the problems of the methods involved in each process, sums up the specific problems, such as The neglect of second-hand equipment, the different types of data submitted, and the lack of consideration of the origin and so on.
Chapter Four: New proposals and evaluation of the new round of international comparison of machinery and equipment in 2011. On the basis of summarizing the international comparison of machinery and equipment in 2005, some suggestions are put forward for the new round of international comparison of machinery and equipment in 2011. In addition, on the basis of summarizing experience, a new round of International comparison of machinery and equipment is also made. The innovations in this paper, such as the Price Factor Method, are studied.
Chapter Five, the key and difficult points of international comparison of mechanical equipment. On the basis of the above discussion, the key and difficult problems in international comparison of mechanical equipment are further discussed and summarized, such as the formulation of product list, the quality assurance of price data of equipment products, the balance of product representativeness and comparability, and so on. A more appropriate method is summed up by edge comparison and the method of PPP summarization.
Chapter 6, conclusions and prospects. The conclusion part is a summary of the above analysis, mainly draws several conclusions, such as the choice of transnational brands, the use of product structure description tables and so on.
The main contributions of this paper are as follows: firstly, the basic process of international comparison of machinery and equipment is sorted out comprehensively, and the basic operation process of the whole international comparison project is simply understood through the process of the project comparison; secondly, the methods involved in each process are discussed in detail, and the existing problems are summarized and given. Corresponding suggestions and measures, at the same time, some innovations have been made on the related issues; Third, China has increased the current research on the international comparison of machinery and equipment. At present, Chinese scholars only study the overall ICP, but not on a certain project in-depth study, so I hope that through this study China can participate in the future. International Comparison of mechanical equipment is helpful.
Of course, there are still great shortcomings in this paper, because international comparative data is difficult to obtain, so this paper lacks specific data support, will be relatively empty, and in some methods, the problem of argument or wording is not in place, these need to be improved later, I will continue to study and improve.
【學位授予單位】：東北財經(jīng)大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：C829.2
【參考文獻】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 王玲;基于購買力平價(PPP)的中外經(jīng)濟實力比較[J];世界經(jīng)濟;2002年07期
2 江健桐;國際比較項目的發(fā)展和初步評價[J];統(tǒng)計研究;1993年01期
3 余芳東;購買力平價和匯率方法的差異程度及其原因分析[J];統(tǒng)計研究;2003年08期
4 叢培華;;國際經(jīng)濟比較中量值統(tǒng)一的價值尺度——剖析聯(lián)合國ICP方法的缺陷[J];統(tǒng)計研究;2007年05期
5 余芳東;;關(guān)于世界銀行2005年ICP結(jié)果、問題及應(yīng)用的研究[J];統(tǒng)計研究;2008年06期
6 袁衛(wèi);邱東;任若恩;李善同;許召元;何新華;;專家詮釋ICP[J];統(tǒng)計研究;2008年06期
7 余芳東;;2011年新一輪國際比較項目(ICP)方法改進[J];統(tǒng)計研究;2011年01期
8 余芳東;當前全球國際比較項目的現(xiàn)狀、問題及建議[J];統(tǒng)計與預(yù)測;2000年03期
9 余芳東;;我國參加國際比較項目(ICP)的演變歷程[J];統(tǒng)計研究;2012年08期
10 鞏斌;對我國參與國際比較項目的思考[J];統(tǒng)計與咨詢;2003年05期
，本文編號：2225645
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/shekelunwen/shgj/2225645.html
最近更新
教材專著
