【摘要】：清末西學(xué)東漸,新思潮對(duì)朝野上下影響巨大,政府對(duì)鄉(xiāng)村治理進(jìn)行了適度調(diào)整與變革。到民國(guó)初年中國(guó)鄉(xiāng)村建設(shè)呈燎原之勢(shì),600多個(gè)鄉(xiāng)村學(xué)術(shù)團(tuán)體和教育機(jī)構(gòu)參與其中,通過(guò)興辦教育、改造農(nóng)業(yè)、流通金融、提倡合作、辦理防衛(wèi),復(fù)蘇日趨衰落的農(nóng)村經(jīng)濟(jì),實(shí)現(xiàn)"民族再造"與"民族自救"。民國(guó)政府也試圖通過(guò)鄉(xiāng)村的自治實(shí)現(xiàn)現(xiàn)代化,其舉措?yún)s背離了現(xiàn)代鄉(xiāng)村民主自治的精神。清末民初的鄉(xiāng)村治理實(shí)踐對(duì)于今天的新型城鎮(zhèn)化建設(shè)而言值得鏡鑒。
[Abstract]:In the late Qing Dynasty, the western learning spread to the east, the new trend of thought had a great influence on the government and the opposition, and the government made a moderate adjustment and reform on the rural governance. By the beginning of the Republic of China, more than 600 rural academic groups and educational institutions had been involved in rural construction. Through the establishment of education, the reform of agriculture, the circulation of finance, the promotion of cooperation, the handling of defense, and the revival of the declining rural economy, To realize "national reconstruction" and "national self-rescue". The government of the Republic of China tried to realize modernization through the autonomy of the countryside, but its measures deviated from the spirit of democratic autonomy in the modern countryside. The practice of rural governance in the late Qing Dynasty and early Republic of China is worth learning from today's new urbanization construction.
【作者單位】： 西南財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué)社會(huì)發(fā)展研究院;中共四川省委黨校期刊社;
【分類號(hào)】：C912.82;K25

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前3條

1 任吉東;;鍥入與磨合:新式學(xué)堂與鄉(xiāng)村治理——以近代直隸省獲鹿縣為例[J];中國(guó)農(nóng)史;2008年01期

2 王亞民;;從《宰惠紀(jì)略》看晚清知縣的鄉(xiāng)村治理[J];東方論壇;2010年02期

3 付建成;肖育雷;;論抗戰(zhàn)時(shí)期陜甘寧邊區(qū)鄉(xiāng)村治理的特點(diǎn)[J];中國(guó)延安干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2009年01期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 李思琦;新中國(guó)鄉(xiāng)村治理方式轉(zhuǎn)型研究[D];河北大學(xué);2013年

2 邱遠(yuǎn)航;民國(guó)時(shí)期的鄉(xiāng)村治理研究[D];陜西師范大學(xué);2009年

，

本文編號(hào)：2218082