【摘要】：20世紀(jì)二三十年代,"到都市去"與"回鄉(xiāng)村去"成為背道而馳的兩大社會(huì)現(xiàn)象,"鄉(xiāng)村破產(chǎn)"和"都市膨脹"為知識(shí)分子所廣泛關(guān)注和焦慮。由此,"建設(shè)新都市"和"改造舊鄉(xiāng)村"成為解決城鄉(xiāng)關(guān)系危機(jī)的兩條路徑,并在當(dāng)時(shí)形成兩股強(qiáng)勁的思潮。是"發(fā)展都市以救濟(jì)鄉(xiāng)村"還是"發(fā)展鄉(xiāng)村以救濟(jì)都市"抑或是"都市與鄉(xiāng)村相互調(diào)和",知識(shí)分子都進(jìn)行了深刻的討論。當(dāng)今城鄉(xiāng)發(fā)展須打破"二元對(duì)立"格局,建立"文化共同體",促進(jìn)城鄉(xiāng)關(guān)系協(xié)調(diào)融合發(fā)展。
[Abstract]:In the twenties and thirties of the 20th century, "going to the city" and "going back to the countryside" became two major social phenomena running counter to each other, and "rural bankruptcy" and "urban expansion" were widely concerned and anxious by intellectuals. Therefore, "building a new city" and "reforming the old countryside" are two ways to solve the crisis of the relationship between urban and rural areas, and two strong thoughts were formed at that time. The intellectuals have deeply discussed whether "developing the city to relieve the countryside" or "developing the village to relieve the city" or "the city and the village are mutually harmonious". Nowadays, the development of urban and rural areas must break the pattern of dualistic opposition, establish a cultural community, and promote the harmonious and integrated development of urban-rural relations.
【作者單位】： 武漢大學(xué)中國傳統(tǒng)文化研究中心;
【分類號(hào)】：C912.8

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 耿達(dá);;近代中國“鄉(xiāng)村改造”的兩條路向[J];華南農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2016年02期

2 梁心;;s蠾的“都市眼光”:20世}\0早期城，

本文編號(hào)：2208594