【摘要】：重寫中國近代學術(shù)史是一項系統(tǒng)工程,涉及到體例、方法、思路等諸多問題。重寫近代學術(shù)史首先在于體例之確定,借鑒中西史書體裁的優(yōu)點,采用綜合創(chuàng)新體裁撰寫學術(shù)史,應(yīng)當成為重寫學術(shù)史題中應(yīng)有之義。而在方法論方面,應(yīng)當?shù)^的范式之爭和意識形態(tài)考量,建立相對客觀的學術(shù)史敘事模式。近代學術(shù)史研究應(yīng)當從學術(shù)自身出發(fā),摒棄預(yù)設(shè)的"范式"和觀念,用恰切的體例編纂出具有時代特色的近代學術(shù)史,這是建立相對客觀的學術(shù)史敘事模式在方法論方面自覺的表現(xiàn)。
[Abstract]:Rewriting the academic history of modern China is a systematic project involving many problems, such as style, methods, ideas and so on. The rewriting of modern academic history lies first in the determination of style, drawing lessons from the advantages of Chinese and Western historical genre, and adopting comprehensive and innovative genres to write academic history, which should become the proper meaning in rewriting academic history. In the aspect of methodology, we should desalinate the controversy of paradigm and ideological considerations, and establish a relatively objective narrative model of academic history. The study of modern academic history should proceed from the academic itself, abandon the presupposition "paradigm" and ideas, and compile the modern academic history with the characteristics of the times with appropriate style. This is to establish a relatively objective narrative model of academic history in the methodology of conscious performance.
【作者單位】： 韓山師范學院歷史系;
【基金】：2010年度教育部人文社會科學規(guī)劃基金項目《中國近代歷史編纂的演變路徑、主要成就與當代價值》(10YJA770043)
【分類號】：C092

【相似文獻】

相關(guān)會議論文 前1條

1 ;說明[A];三生共贏論壇·2009北京會議會議材料[C];2009年

相關(guān)重要報紙文章 前1條

1 武道房 安徽師范大學文學院;詮釋中國思想史本質(zhì)[N];中國社會科學報;2010年

，

本文編號：2171781