【摘要】：正我不敢自稱是歷史人類學(xué)家,如果要自稱歷史學(xué)家可能又有歷史學(xué)家反對,當(dāng)然我更不愿自稱人類學(xué)家。所以剛剛趙老師的問題,我不能從人類學(xué)的角度來回答。但是據(jù)我的了解⺁在人類學(xué)之中,每一代的人類學(xué)者,或即使同一代的人類學(xué)者,也有彼此不同的觀點(diǎn)。剛剛趙老師提的問題非常對:人類學(xué)的研究對象是"文化",然而⺁究竟什么是文化?人類學(xué)一直想解決這個(gè)問題。但是最近這些年人類學(xué)似乎陷入低潮,主要原因是⺁新一代人類學(xué)家把他們的前輩給解構(gòu)了。我覺得⺁這反而是人類學(xué)最精彩的地方。它對本學(xué)
[Abstract]:I dare not call myself a historical anthropologist, and if I want to call myself a historian, there may be historians who oppose it, and of course I do not want to call myself an anthropologist. So just teacher Zhao's question, I can not from an anthropological point of view to answer. But as far as I know? In anthropology, each generation of anthropologists, or even the same generation of anthropologists, has different views. The question just asked by Mr. Zhao is very correct: the subject of anthropology is "culture", however? What is culture? Anthropology has been trying to solve this problem. But in recent years anthropology seems to be in a low ebb. What is the main reason? The new generation of anthropologists deconstructed their predecessors. I think This, on the contrary, is the best part of anthropology. It has a positive effect on learning.
【作者單位】： 臺(tái)灣中興大學(xué);
【分類號(hào)】：C03
，

本文編號(hào)：2167235