本文選題：中國當(dāng)代 + 學(xué)術(shù)癥候　； 參考：《學(xué)術(shù)界》2016年09期

【摘要】：對當(dāng)代中國的學(xué)術(shù),以縱向的歷史眼光看,它處于整理整合的歷史時(shí)期,而橫向來看,它處于功利導(dǎo)向的社會環(huán)境中。當(dāng)代學(xué)術(shù)有四大問題,包括停留在文獻(xiàn)整理,而不能將學(xué)理推進(jìn)創(chuàng)新;研究中各自為陣;硬性化的評價(jià)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)形成學(xué)術(shù)的強(qiáng)權(quán);功利導(dǎo)向下學(xué)術(shù)的浮躁而不能深入。具體到學(xué)術(shù)方法上,有五種捷徑。這包括整理新出文獻(xiàn);各種的比較研究;對已有理論進(jìn)行組構(gòu)重建;依附性的文獻(xiàn)闡釋;依賴于文獻(xiàn)引用的變相抄襲。但這些捷徑包含很大的隱性缺陷,抑制了學(xué)人的創(chuàng)新性。
[Abstract]:From a vertical historical perspective, the academic of contemporary China is in the historical period of consolidation and integration, while horizontally, it is in a utilitarian social environment. There are four major problems in contemporary academic research, including staying in literature collation, not pushing academic theory forward to innovation; studying each other as a matrix; rigid evaluation standard forms academic power; and academic impetuosity under utilitarian guidance cannot go deep. There are five shortcuts to academic methods. This includes sorting out new literature; various comparative studies; reconstruction of existing theories; dependent interpretation of literature; and covert plagiarism dependent on citation of literature. But these shortcuts contain a lot of hidden defects, and inhibit the innovation of the scholar.
【作者單位】： 清華大學(xué)人文學(xué)院;
【分類號】：C12
，

本文編號：2091533