本文選題：農(nóng)民糾紛 + 糾紛解決方式��； 參考：《山東理工大學(xué)》2011年碩士論文

【摘要】：當(dāng)前,中國農(nóng)村社會正經(jīng)歷著由傳統(tǒng)倫理型社會向法理型社會的深刻變革,農(nóng)民的思想、行為方式等都在趨于理性化,現(xiàn)代性,這種變化必然反映在農(nóng)民糾紛及其解決方式的選擇上。本文是以社會學(xué)理論和方法為基礎(chǔ),以理性選擇理論和關(guān)系距離理論為研究視角,通過對魯西南地區(qū)馬嶺崗鎮(zhèn)農(nóng)民糾紛及其解決方式的問卷調(diào)查和個案訪談,分析了當(dāng)前中國農(nóng)民糾紛的基本情況,重點探討了農(nóng)民糾紛解決方式的特點、選擇策略、影響因素,并為建立和完善符合農(nóng)民需求的糾紛解決機制提出了自己的思考和建議。 本文包括五章,可分為三個部分。第一章為第一部分,主要介紹了課題來源、研究意義、理論基礎(chǔ)、核心概念、研究方法,并對國內(nèi)外以往的相關(guān)研究進行了文獻梳理。第二章、第三章、第四章為第二部分,重點分析研究了轉(zhuǎn)型期的農(nóng)村社會多樣化和復(fù)雜化的糾紛現(xiàn)狀,農(nóng)民糾紛解決的主要方式,農(nóng)民糾紛解決方式的特點及其選擇策略、影響因素。認(rèn)為在當(dāng)前我國農(nóng)村社會,既存在國家正式糾紛解決方式,也存在民間非正式糾紛解決方式,已初步形成了多元化的糾紛解決體系,而民間方式仍然是農(nóng)民主要的糾紛解決方式；農(nóng)民對解紛方式的選擇呈現(xiàn)順次遞進的特點,即如果糾紛在低效力等級的糾紛解決方式中得不到解決,那么在個人理性的作用下,他們會尋求更高效力級別的糾紛解決途徑,國家正式糾紛解決方式中的司法方式(訴訟方式)成為最后一道屏障。影響農(nóng)民糾紛解決方式選擇的因素是多方面的：從案件的主體因素看,案主的年齡、性別、文化程度、經(jīng)濟收入等對糾紛解決反方式的選擇,影響很大；從案件因素看,案件的性質(zhì)、當(dāng)事人的地位結(jié)構(gòu)與差異、關(guān)系距離等對農(nóng)民糾紛結(jié)局方式的選擇有重要影響；從社會因素看,社群意識、權(quán)威認(rèn)同、經(jīng)濟成本、政府正式糾紛解決機制的不足和民間糾紛結(jié)局方式的適應(yīng)性,是影響農(nóng)民糾紛解決方式選擇的重要因素。第五章為第三部分,在對農(nóng)民糾紛解決方式全面分析研究的基礎(chǔ)上,提出當(dāng)前我國廣大農(nóng)村地區(qū),農(nóng)村社會生活的“村莊共同體”依然存在；鄉(xiāng)土社會作為一個熟人社會的基本狀況仍然保留著；現(xiàn)代農(nóng)村社會產(chǎn)生了對法律的內(nèi)在需求,但農(nóng)民的法律意識依然薄弱；良好的農(nóng)民糾紛解決方式,有利于促進社會和諧,因此我們必須充分重視民間規(guī)范的基礎(chǔ)性作用,彌補市場經(jīng)濟的不足,建立和完善農(nóng)民多方面、多層次需求的糾紛解決機制。
[Abstract]:At present, China's rural society is undergoing a profound transformation from a traditional ethical society to a legal one. The farmers' thinking and behavior are tending to be rationalized and modern. This kind of change must reflect in the choice of peasant dispute and its solution. This paper is based on the theory and method of sociology, taking rational choice theory and relation distance theory as the research angle, through the questionnaire survey and the case interview to the peasant dispute and its solution in Malinggang Town, southwest of Shandong Province. This paper analyzes on the basic situation of Chinese peasants' disputes, probes into the characteristics, selection strategies and influencing factors of the peasants' dispute resolution methods, and puts forward some thoughts and suggestions for establishing and perfecting the dispute resolution mechanism in accordance with the farmers' needs. This article includes five chapters, can be divided into three parts. The first chapter is the first part, which mainly introduces the source of the subject, significance, theoretical basis, core concepts, research methods, and domestic and foreign previous related research literature combing. Chapter two, Chapter three, Chapter four is the second part, which focuses on the analysis and study of the rural social diversity and complexity of the status quo of disputes, the main ways of peasant dispute resolution, the characteristics of the peasant dispute resolution methods and their choice strategies. Influencing factors. It is believed that in the current rural society, there are both formal and informal dispute resolution methods of the state, and a pluralistic dispute resolution system has been initially formed. However, the folk way is still the main dispute resolution method for the peasants, and the peasants' choice of the dispute resolution mode shows the characteristics of progressive step by step, that is, if the dispute is not resolved in the low-grade dispute resolution method, then under the function of personal rationality, They will seek a more effective level of dispute resolution, the state of formal dispute resolution in the way of justice (litigation) as a final barrier. The factors that affect the choice of dispute resolution methods for farmers are as follows: from the point of view of the main factors of the case, the age, sex, education level and economic income of the owner of the case have a great impact on the choice of the counter-mode of dispute resolution, and from the point of view of the case factors, The nature of the case, the status structure and difference of the parties, the distance between the relationship and other factors have an important influence on the choice of the outcome of the peasant dispute, from the perspective of social factors, community awareness, authority identity, economic costs, etc. The deficiency of the government's formal dispute resolution mechanism and the adaptability of the folk dispute outcome are the important factors influencing the choice of the peasants' dispute settlement. The fifth chapter is the third part, on the basis of the comprehensive analysis and research on the peasants' dispute resolution, it points out that the village community still exists in the vast rural areas of our country; The basic condition of the local society as an acquaintance society is still preserved; the modern rural society has produced the inherent demand for the law, but the farmer's legal consciousness is still weak, the good peasant dispute settlement way, is advantageous to promote the social harmony, Therefore, we must pay full attention to the basic role of folk norms, make up for the lack of market economy, and establish and perfect the dispute resolution mechanism of farmers in various and multi-level needs.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：山東理工大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號】：C912.82

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前7條

1 陸益龍;;糾紛解決的法社會學(xué)研究:問題及范式[J];湖南社會科學(xué);2009年01期

2 郭星華,王平;中國農(nóng)村的糾紛與解決途徑——關(guān)于中國農(nóng)村法律意識與法律行為的實證研究[J];江蘇社會科學(xué);2004年02期

3 郭星華;邢朝國;;從送法下鄉(xiāng)到理性選擇——鄉(xiāng)土社會的法律實踐[J];黑龍江社會科學(xué);2010年01期

4 陳偉杰;郭星華;;法律的差序利用——以一個宗族村落的糾紛調(diào)解為例[J];中國農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2009年02期

5 趙旭東;習(xí)俗、權(quán)威與糾紛解決的場域——河北一村落的法律人類學(xué)考察[J];社會學(xué)研究;2001年02期

6 董磊明;;村莊糾紛調(diào)解機制的研究路徑[J];學(xué)習(xí)與探索;2006年01期

7 董磊明;陳柏峰;聶良波;;結(jié)構(gòu)混亂與迎法下鄉(xiāng)——河南宋村法律實踐的解讀[J];中國社會科學(xué);2008年05期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 朱長江;國家法與民間規(guī)則的互動——對河北農(nóng)村社區(qū)“私了”現(xiàn)象的分析[D];中國農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué);2003年

2 艾丹;透析農(nóng)村民事糾紛解決現(xiàn)狀[D];南昌大學(xué);2008年

，

本文編號：1964953