本文選題：社會(huì)學(xué) + 本土化��； 參考：《社會(huì)學(xué)研究》2017年05期

【摘要】：社會(huì)學(xué)本土化或中國化是一個(gè)民國時(shí)期就已提出的議題。自20世紀(jì)80年代社會(huì)學(xué)學(xué)科在中國恢復(fù)重建以來,這個(gè)議題就不斷被提出、討論和爭論。大致來說,圍繞社會(huì)學(xué)本土化的爭論產(chǎn)生了兩大陣營:本土化倡議者和本土化反對者。本文首先對雙方的爭辯進(jìn)行了梳理,然后分析了社會(huì)學(xué)本土化問題的癥結(jié)所在,最后指出了解決社會(huì)學(xué)本土化問題的出路。文章認(rèn)為,社會(huì)學(xué)本土化的討論應(yīng)深入到"知識(shí)創(chuàng)新力不足"的制度根源問題。知識(shí)創(chuàng)新力不足問題解決了,社會(huì)學(xué)本土化就是水到渠成的事情。
[Abstract]:The localization or localization of sociology is an issue raised in the period of the Republic of China. This issue has been raised, discussed and debated since the 1980s when sociology was rebuilt in China. Broadly speaking, the debate over the localization of sociology has produced two camps: the proponents of localization and the opponents of localization. This paper first combs the argument between the two sides, then analyzes the crux of the problem of sociological localization, and finally points out the way out to solve the problem of sociological localization. The article holds that the discussion of sociological localization should go deep into the system root problem of "insufficient ability of knowledge innovation". The problem of insufficient knowledge innovation has been solved, and the localization of sociology is a natural thing.
【作者單位】： 中山大學(xué)社會(huì)學(xué)與人類學(xué)學(xué)院;
【分類號】：C91
，

本文編號：1918680