發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-05-03 13:36

  本文選題：社會(huì)轉(zhuǎn)型背景 + 家庭行動(dòng)��； 參考：《西南大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：家庭平衡既是一個(gè)家庭問題,也是一個(gè)社會(huì)問題,它引起廣泛的社會(huì)關(guān)注。這是探討家庭平衡的直接現(xiàn)實(shí)動(dòng)因。同時(shí),國內(nèi)外對家庭平衡問題的考察多遵循的是孔德或涂爾干的家庭道德研究取向,亦有從結(jié)構(gòu)平衡理論、自發(fā)實(shí)現(xiàn)平衡論、差序格局、中等關(guān)系、自我行動(dòng)的邏輯的研究,但是從大家庭中的家庭成員的行動(dòng)來進(jìn)行考察的研究較少。因此,從現(xiàn)實(shí)層面和理論研究兩個(gè)方面來講,進(jìn)行家庭行動(dòng)研究都具有重要的意義和價(jià)值。 這里旨在從家庭行動(dòng)入手來探討轉(zhuǎn)型背景下家庭平衡的邏輯,并對相關(guān)問題進(jìn)行具體的考察分析。在此基礎(chǔ)上,主要以下三個(gè)方面的研究：第一,考察轉(zhuǎn)型背景下父母在家庭行動(dòng)選擇過程與策略。第二,考察轉(zhuǎn)型背景下子女在家庭行動(dòng)選擇過程與策略。第三,考察轉(zhuǎn)型背景下兄弟在家庭行動(dòng)選擇過程與策略。研究的主要結(jié)論如下： 鄉(xiāng)村家庭呈現(xiàn)出動(dòng)態(tài)平衡的過程,即從子女的出生到分家之前,家庭一直處于一種幸福和諧的平衡狀態(tài)。父母進(jìn)行家庭分家與繼承的初衷是一種為自身平衡的策略,遵循“一碗水端平”的原則,然而分家與繼承的結(jié)果卻是家庭失衡的開始。經(jīng)過時(shí)間的磨合,空間的轉(zhuǎn)換,當(dāng)前親子家庭或兄弟家庭之間趨向于和睦相處的平衡狀態(tài)。 在真實(shí)世界里的家庭行動(dòng)中,人們的行動(dòng)策略是極其復(fù)雜和富有彈性的,家庭行動(dòng)中平衡邏輯的特點(diǎn)：家庭行動(dòng)中有多重行動(dòng)邏輯,家庭行動(dòng)邏輯的不等值性,家庭行動(dòng)邏輯中的差序橫縱性。 家庭行動(dòng)中動(dòng)態(tài)平衡的復(fù)雜影響因素有：社會(huì)環(huán)境的客觀制約,人的主觀能動(dòng)性。 總之,這里對家庭行動(dòng)中的平衡邏輯進(jìn)行了較為系統(tǒng)的研究,具有較高的理論價(jià)值與實(shí)踐意義。這里從家庭行動(dòng)入手來探討家庭平衡問題,在一定程度上拓展了相關(guān)研究的領(lǐng)域。這里存在的主要局限是對家庭行動(dòng)中平衡邏輯的探討,基本上是一種動(dòng)態(tài)的狀態(tài)考察,而缺乏對家庭行動(dòng)的靜態(tài)考察,每一個(gè)橫切面都是動(dòng)態(tài)考察的重要部分。
[Abstract]:Family balance is not only a family problem, but also a social problem. This is the direct realistic motivation to explore family balance. At the same time, the study of family balance at home and abroad mostly follows the research orientation of family morality of Conde or Durkheim, and also from the theory of structural balance, the spontaneous realization of balance theory, the pattern of difference, the middle relationship, and the logic of self-action. But little research has been done to examine the actions of family members in extended families. Therefore, it is of great significance and value to carry out family action research in both practical and theoretical aspects. The purpose of this paper is to probe into the logic of family balance in the context of transition from the perspective of family action, and to make a specific investigation and analysis of relevant issues. On this basis, the following three aspects of the study: first, the study of parents in the context of transition in the family action choice process and strategy. Secondly, it examines the process and strategy of children's choice of family action under the background of transition. Thirdly, it examines the process and strategy of family action selection under the background of transition. The main findings of the study are as follows: Rural families show a process of dynamic balance, that is, from the birth of children to the separation of families, the family has been in a happy and harmonious balance. The original intention of parents' family separation and inheritance is a strategy of balancing themselves, following the principle of "one bowl of water is flat", but the result of separation and inheritance is the beginning of family imbalance. Over time and space, the current balance between parent-child and brotherly families tends to be in harmony. In the real world of family action, people's strategies of action are extremely complex and flexible, and the characteristics of balanced logic in family action are: how much logic of action in family action, the inequivalence of logic of family action, The transversely and horizontally different order in the family action logic. The complex influencing factors of dynamic balance in family action are: objective restriction of social environment, subjective initiative of human. In a word, the equilibrium logic in family action is studied systematically, which has high theoretical value and practical significance. This paper discusses family balance from family action, to a certain extent, expand the field of relevant research. The main limitation here is the discussion of equilibrium logic in family action, which is basically a kind of dynamic state inspection, while the lack of static investigation of family action, each cross section is an important part of dynamic investigation.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西南大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：C913.1;C912.6

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 李繼興;關(guān)于應(yīng)用哲學(xué)平衡論的思考[J];北京大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2003年01期

2 鄧才彪;涂爾干道德教育思想述評(píng)[J];外國教育動(dòng)態(tài);1989年02期

3 楊東平;;從權(quán)利平等到機(jī)會(huì)均等——新中國教育公平的軌跡[J];北京大學(xué)教育評(píng)論;2006年02期

4 張銀岳;;社會(huì)行動(dòng)的邏輯:傳統(tǒng)的以及當(dāng)代的視角[J];桂海論叢;2009年06期

5 任敏;;現(xiàn)代社會(huì)的人際關(guān)系類型及其互動(dòng)邏輯——試談“差序格局”模型的擴(kuò)展[J];華中科技大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2009年02期

6 石全玉;;韋伯的社會(huì)學(xué)建構(gòu)主義理論解析[J];蘭州學(xué)刊;2011年07期

7 張銀岳;;從結(jié)構(gòu)、心靈到體系:社會(huì)行動(dòng)的邏輯演進(jìn)[J];西南大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2010年05期

8 王善英;;韋伯論人與社會(huì)的關(guān)系[J];新疆社會(huì)科學(xué);2007年01期

9 李春玲;社會(huì)政治變遷與教育機(jī)會(huì)不平等——家庭背景及制度因素對教育獲得的影響(1940—2001)[J];中國社會(huì)科學(xué);2003年03期

10 麻國慶;分家:分中有繼也有合——中國分家制度研究[J];中國社會(huì)科學(xué);1999年01期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 帥倩;赫勒日常生活批判研究[D];復(fù)旦大學(xué);2011年

，

本文編號(hào)：1838690