本文選題：初中生 + 校園暴力　； 參考：《華東師范大學(xué)》2011年碩士論文

【摘要】：本研究的主要目的是了解初中生校園暴力行為的類型與分布狀況,重點探討家庭對初中生校園暴力行為的影響,并據(jù)此提出應(yīng)對校園暴力的教育建議。 本研究以安徽省某中學(xué)的366名初中生為研究對象,以調(diào)查法為主要研究方法,運(yùn)用問卷法、量表測量法與文獻(xiàn)法搜集資料,同時運(yùn)用SPSS 16.0軟件分析資料。本文以家庭因素為預(yù)測變量,校園暴力行為為結(jié)果變量。家庭變量可分為客觀變量和主觀變量�？陀^變量包括：家庭結(jié)構(gòu)、家庭子女?dāng)?shù)量、父親職業(yè)、母親職業(yè)、父親受教育程度、母親受教育程度和家庭經(jīng)濟(jì)水平。主觀變量指的是父親教養(yǎng)方式和母親教養(yǎng)方式。 本文調(diào)查發(fā)現(xiàn),90.7%的初中生校園暴力行為集中在輕、中度兩個等級上且存在年級和性別上的顯著差異。具體而言,男生發(fā)生校園暴力行為的頻率要高于女生；初一、初三學(xué)生發(fā)生校園暴力行為的頻率要高于初二學(xué)生。 研究表明,經(jīng)過獨立樣本T檢驗、方差檢驗以及相關(guān)分析,家庭主客觀變量均對初中生校園暴力行為產(chǎn)生影響,具體結(jié)論如下： 一、客觀變量中的家庭結(jié)構(gòu)、家庭子女?dāng)?shù)量、父親職業(yè)以及父親受教育程度對初中生校園暴力行為具有顯著性影響,其中,父親職業(yè)最具解釋作用。而家庭經(jīng)濟(jì)水平、母親職業(yè)和母親受教育程度對其影響未達(dá)到統(tǒng)計意義上的顯著水平。 二、父親職業(yè)為“商業(yè)服務(wù)人員”和“農(nóng)民”的初中生校園暴力行為發(fā)生的最多,而父親職業(yè)為“教師、科技和醫(yī)療衛(wèi)生人員”的初中生發(fā)生校園暴力行為最少；單親、重組和隔代家庭子女的校園暴力行為發(fā)生頻率要高于其他家庭；獨生子女比非獨生子女的校園暴力行為更多。 三、父母教養(yǎng)方式兩種主觀變量均對初中生校園暴力行為產(chǎn)生影響。父親教養(yǎng)方式中,情感溫暖與理解因子最具解釋作用；母親教養(yǎng)方式中則是拒絕否認(rèn)因子最具解釋力。 最后本研究提出了從構(gòu)建預(yù)防校園暴力的生態(tài)體系、加強(qiáng)和重視家庭教育、倡導(dǎo)應(yīng)對校園暴力的家校合作三方面應(yīng)對初中生校園暴力的教育建議。
[Abstract]:The main purpose of this study is to understand the types and distribution of campus violence of junior high school students, and to discuss the influence of family on the violence in junior high school, and to put forward some educational suggestions to deal with campus violence. In this study, 366 junior high school students in a middle school in Anhui Province were chosen as the research objects. The survey method was used as the main research method, the questionnaire method, the scale measurement method and the literature method were used to collect the data. At the same time, SPSS 16.0 software was used to analyze the data. In this paper, family factors as predictive variables, school violence as a result variable. Family variables can be divided into objective variables and subjective variables. Objective variables include: family structure, number of family children, father's occupation, mother's occupation, father's education level, mother's education level and family economic level. The subjective variable refers to the father's rearing style and the mother's rearing style. The investigation shows that 90.7% of the junior high school students focus on the mild and moderate levels of school violence, and there are significant differences between grade and sex. Specifically, the frequency of campus violence occurred by boys is higher than that by girls, and the frequency of campus violence by junior high school students is higher than that by junior high school students. The study shows that the independent sample T test, variance test and correlation analysis show that the subjective and objective family variables have an impact on the school violence behavior of junior high school students. The specific conclusions are as follows: 1. The family structure, the number of family children, the father's occupation and the father's education level in the objective variables have significant influence on the campus violence of junior high school students, among which, the father's occupation is the most important explanation. However, the influence of family economic level, mother's occupation and mother's education level on it did not reach the statistically significant level. Second, middle school students with father occupation as "business service personnel" and "farmer" had the highest incidence of school violence, while junior high school students with father occupation as "teachers, science and technology and health personnel" had the least incidence of school violence; single parents, The frequency of school violence among children of recombined and intergenerational families is higher than that of other families, and that of only children is more than that of non-only children. Third, the two subjective variables of parental rearing style have an impact on the campus violence of junior high school students. The factor of emotional warmth and understanding is the most explanatory factor in the father's rearing style, and the factor of rejection and denial is the most explanatory factor in the mother's rearing style. Finally, the paper puts forward some educational suggestions on how to deal with school violence in junior high school from three aspects: constructing the ecological system of preventing campus violence, strengthening and attaching importance to family education and advocating the cooperation of home and school to deal with campus violence.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華東師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號】：C913.5

【引證文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 張哲仁;中學(xué)校園暴力問題研究[D];河南大學(xué);2013年

，

本文編號：1836165