本文選題：證據(jù)為本 + 系統(tǒng)評(píng)價(jià)　； 參考：《華東理工大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版)》2017年04期

【摘要】：隨著政府購(gòu)買(mǎi)服務(wù)決策的科學(xué)化,越來(lái)越多的決策需要基于證據(jù),然而當(dāng)前從業(yè)人員并不經(jīng)常使用最佳依據(jù)指導(dǎo)決策和實(shí)踐,這種情況也越來(lái)越受到重視,迫切需要加強(qiáng)證據(jù)為本的社會(huì)工作理念。社會(huì)工作教育者和研究者需要掌握更加專業(yè)的證據(jù)生產(chǎn)方法——系統(tǒng)評(píng)價(jià),從而為證據(jù)為本的社會(huì)工作提供當(dāng)前最佳的決策證據(jù)。本文將從問(wèn)題的提出、檢索和篩選文獻(xiàn)、質(zhì)量評(píng)價(jià)、數(shù)據(jù)分析合成、研究結(jié)果討論等部分介紹系統(tǒng)評(píng)價(jià)的撰寫(xiě)方法,期待被國(guó)內(nèi)更多的社會(huì)工作研究者和教育者應(yīng)用。
[Abstract]:With the scientific decision-making of government purchasing services, more and more decisions need to be based on evidence. However, nowadays, practitioners do not often use the best basis to guide decision-making and practice, and this situation has been paid more and more attention.There is an urgent need to strengthen the evidence-based concept of social work.Social work educators and researchers need to master a more professional method of evidence production-systematic evaluation, so as to provide the best decision evidence for evidence-based social work.This paper will introduce the writing methods of systematic evaluation from the aspects of problem raising, retrieval and screening of literature, quality evaluation, data analysis and synthesis, discussion of research results, etc. It is expected to be applied by more researchers and educators of social work in China.
【作者單位】： 南京理工大學(xué)公共事務(wù)學(xué)院;蘭州大學(xué)循證醫(yī)學(xué)中心;美國(guó)南加州大學(xué)社會(huì)工作學(xué)院;華東理工大學(xué)社會(huì)與公共管理學(xué)院;中國(guó)人民大學(xué)社會(huì)與人口學(xué)院社會(huì)工作系;南京大學(xué)社會(huì)學(xué)院社會(huì)工作與社會(huì)政策系;香港大學(xué)社會(huì)工作及社會(huì)行政學(xué)系;臺(tái)灣大學(xué)社會(huì)工作系;北京大學(xué)社會(huì)系;
【基金】：蘭州大學(xué)“中央高�；究蒲袠I(yè)務(wù)費(fèi)專項(xiàng)基金”面上項(xiàng)目(編號(hào):LZUJBKY-2016-69);蘭州大學(xué)“中央高�；究蒲袠I(yè)務(wù)費(fèi)”項(xiàng)目(編號(hào):16LZUJBWTD013)的階段性成果
【分類號(hào)】：C916
，

本文編號(hào)：1759125