本文選題：承諾 + 認(rèn)同　； 參考：《中國(guó)社會(huì)科學(xué)院研究生院》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：現(xiàn)代社會(huì)是復(fù)雜與多面的鑲嵌結(jié)構(gòu),自我為了協(xié)調(diào)與這樣的社會(huì)的相互作用,擁有多種角色,并對(duì)不同的角色具有不同的認(rèn)同。族群認(rèn)同是個(gè)人擁有的多重社會(huì)認(rèn)同的重要形式之一,體現(xiàn)著個(gè)人對(duì)特定族群的信念、態(tài)度、參與行為以及對(duì)其族群身份的承認(rèn)和認(rèn)可,具有強(qiáng)大的行為驅(qū)動(dòng)力。它的強(qiáng)弱不僅促進(jìn)或制約著個(gè)人的行為、決定著族群內(nèi)部凝聚性的大小,也關(guān)系著不同族群之間的交往與溝通,影響著族群乃至整個(gè)和諧社會(huì)的建立和良性運(yùn)轉(zhuǎn)。本文遵從斯特賴克的“認(rèn)同理論”,在承諾-認(rèn)同-行為的框架下,以中國(guó)國(guó)家青年社科基金項(xiàng)目《西北民族地區(qū)穆斯林大學(xué)生族群認(rèn)同的群際行為模式與網(wǎng)絡(luò)化影響研究》所獲得的3703份問(wèn)卷調(diào)查資料為基礎(chǔ),運(yùn)用結(jié)構(gòu)方程模型對(duì)中國(guó)西北民族地區(qū)高校大學(xué)生群體尋求情感支持的族群偏好行為的影響路徑與因素進(jìn)行了實(shí)證分析,在一定程度上檢驗(yàn)了斯特賴克的“認(rèn)同理論”在中國(guó)西北民族地區(qū)高校大學(xué)生群體中的適應(yīng)性。研究表明:反映交友結(jié)構(gòu)的承諾與個(gè)體擁有的族群認(rèn)同對(duì)民族大學(xué)生的交友的族群偏好產(chǎn)生影響,民族大學(xué)生在進(jìn)行尋求情感支持時(shí),是存在族群偏好的。民族大學(xué)生情感支持網(wǎng)承諾對(duì)于族群偏好的影響存在直接與間接兩條路徑。圍繞個(gè)人角色形成的社會(huì)結(jié)構(gòu)決定了人們的交往模式,無(wú)論受訪者的民族是什么,人們對(duì)其族群粘性越大,其越傾向和同族的人訴說(shuō)心事。同時(shí),無(wú)論是漢族還是少數(shù)民族大學(xué)生,其情感支持核心朋友網(wǎng)的承諾都對(duì)其傾訴行為的族群偏好有影響,但不同之處在于,對(duì)于少數(shù)民族大學(xué)生群體,這種朋友關(guān)系偏好的“結(jié)構(gòu)決定論”更強(qiáng),因果關(guān)系更加明顯。本研究的一個(gè)值得討論的發(fā)現(xiàn)在于:無(wú)論漢族還是少數(shù)民族大學(xué)生,其情感支持核心網(wǎng)的承諾依然是決定他們擇友族群偏好的關(guān)鍵因素,族群認(rèn)同作為一個(gè)十分重要的中介變量雖有一定影響,但其作用并不像斯特賴克的“認(rèn)同理論”中描述的那樣重要。
[Abstract]:Modern society is a complex and multi-faceted inlaid structure. In order to coordinate the interaction with such a society, the ego has a variety of roles and different recognition of different roles.Ethnic identity is one of the important forms of multiple social identity owned by individuals. It embodies the belief attitude participation behavior and recognition and recognition of the ethnic identity of a particular ethnic group and has a strong behavioral driving force.Its strength and weakness not only promote or restrict individual behavior, determine the size of cohesion within ethnic groups, but also affect the communication and communication between different ethnic groups, and affect the establishment and healthy operation of ethnic groups and even the whole harmonious society.This paper follows Stryker's "identity theory", under the framework of commitment-identity-behavior,Based on 3703 questionnaires obtained from the National Youth Social Science Foundation of China, "Research on the intergroup behavior pattern and Network impact of Muslim College students' ethnic identity in Northwest ethnic areas",By using the structural equation model, this paper makes an empirical analysis on the influence path and factors of the ethnic preference behavior of college students seeking emotional support in the northwest ethnic minority area of China.To some extent, it tests the adaptability of Stryker's "identity theory" to the college students in Northwest China.The research shows that the commitment to reflect the structure of making friends and the ethnic identity owned by the individual have an impact on the ethnic preference of ethnic college students, and ethnic preference exists in the process of seeking emotional support for ethnic college students.There are direct and indirect ways for ethnic college students' emotional support network commitment to affect ethnic preference.The social structure formed around the personal role determines the communication pattern of people. No matter what the nationality of the interviewees, the greater the stickiness of the interviewees, the more inclined they are to tell their feelings with the people of the same race.At the same time, whether Han or minority college students, the commitment of their emotional support core friends network has an impact on the ethnic preferences of their confiding behavior, but the difference is that, for minority college students,This kind of friend relation preference "structure determinism" is stronger, the causality is more obvious.One of the findings worth discussing in this study is that the commitment of emotional support core network is still the key factor to determine the preference of the ethnic groups of Han and ethnic minorities.Although ethnic identity is a very important intermediate variable, its function is not as important as that described in Stryker's identity Theory.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：中國(guó)社會(huì)科學(xué)院研究生院
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：C912.6

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 李忠路;邱澤奇;;家庭背景如何影響兒童學(xué)業(yè)成就?——義務(wù)教育階段家庭社會(huì)經(jīng)濟(jì)地位影響差異分析[J];社會(huì)學(xué)研究;2016年04期

2 姜術(shù)容;;論群際接觸理論的核心:過(guò)失無(wú)知抑或其他——兼與陳晶、佐斌教授商榷[J];民族論壇;2015年10期

3 谷建杰;李鳳蘭;董虹媛;孟琪;;群際接觸理論視角下民漢大學(xué)生混合住宿模式探討[J];學(xué)校黨建與思想教育;2014年08期

4 嚴(yán)鳴;涂紅偉;李驥;;認(rèn)同理論視角下新員工組織社會(huì)化的定義及結(jié)構(gòu)維度[J];心理科學(xué)進(jìn)展;2011年05期

5 吳作富;;社會(huì)心理學(xué)視野下的兩種認(rèn)同理論:整合抑或分立?[J];南京師大學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2010年05期

6 趙靜;王莉萍;;認(rèn)同的三種理論取向概述[J];牡丹江大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2009年12期

7 覃乃昌;;從族群認(rèn)同走向民族認(rèn)同——20世紀(jì)中后期廣西的民族識(shí)別研究之三[J];廣西民族研究;2009年03期

8 王歆;;認(rèn)同理論的起源、發(fā)展與評(píng)述[J];新疆社科論壇;2009年02期

9 周曉虹;;認(rèn)同理論:社會(huì)學(xué)與心理學(xué)的分析路徑[J];社會(huì)科學(xué);2008年04期

10 萬(wàn)明鋼;王舟;;族群認(rèn)同、族群認(rèn)同的發(fā)展及測(cè)定與研究方法[J];世界民族;2007年03期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 李秀勤;我國(guó)全日制專業(yè)學(xué)位研究生角色認(rèn)同研究[D];西南大學(xué);2012年

，

本文編號(hào)：1731448