本文選題：第三條思路　切入點(diǎn)：文化保護(hù)　出處：《中央民族大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版)》2017年03期

【摘要】：在當(dāng)前“原生態(tài)文化”保護(hù)運(yùn)動(dòng)的熱潮中,存在著兩種互相對(duì)立的理解進(jìn)路與保護(hù)方案:批駁論與辯護(hù)論,二者分別在“結(jié)構(gòu)”與“歷史”之間各持一端。這種爭(zhēng)論遮蔽了文化保護(hù)背后的社會(huì)總體面向。云南省洱源縣土風(fēng)計(jì)劃的實(shí)踐說明,“原生態(tài)文化”的維系與保護(hù)過程,是多元主體與理念的并接過程,是社會(huì)結(jié)構(gòu)與歷史實(shí)踐碰撞后的總體呈現(xiàn),地方社會(huì)與民族關(guān)系為這種“并接”提供了文化底色。我們應(yīng)該以第三條思路,即地方社會(huì)場(chǎng)域中的并接視角來理解這場(chǎng)文化保護(hù)運(yùn)動(dòng)及其中涉及的多元主體關(guān)系。
[Abstract]:In the current upsurge of the conservation movement of "original ecological culture", there are two opposite approaches to understanding and protection: criticism and defense. The two sides hold one end respectively between "structure" and "history". This kind of argument obscures the overall social orientation behind cultural protection. The practice of the earth-style plan in Eryuan County of Yunnan Province shows that the maintenance and protection process of "original ecological culture". It is a process of juxtaposition of multiple subjects and ideas, and a general presentation after the collision between social structure and historical practice. The relationship between local society and ethnic groups provides the cultural background for this kind of "union". That is to say, the conjunctive angle of view in the local social field is to understand the cultural conservation movement and the multi-subject relationship involved in it.
，

本文編號(hào)：1677515