發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-03-20 00:02

  本文選題：圖書(shū)評(píng)價(jià)后期資助　切入點(diǎn)：　出處：《西南民族大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(人文社科版)》2016年06期 　論文類(lèi)型：期刊論文

【摘要】：人文社科類(lèi)學(xué)術(shù)成果不同于自然科學(xué),其表現(xiàn)形式更加多樣,研究周期相對(duì)較長(zhǎng),評(píng)價(jià)方式更加復(fù)雜。目前對(duì)于人文社科類(lèi)的期刊評(píng)價(jià),因?yàn)槠诳哂休^強(qiáng)的出版周期固定,數(shù)量較少等因素,研究相對(duì)成熟;而對(duì)于學(xué)術(shù)圖書(shū),由于圖書(shū)發(fā)行量大且出版周期不固定等因素,評(píng)價(jià)體系的構(gòu)建仍值得進(jìn)一步討論。希望對(duì)后期資助項(xiàng)目的學(xué)術(shù)成果的評(píng)價(jià)實(shí)踐,能夠?qū)D書(shū)評(píng)價(jià)體系的構(gòu)建做出一些有益的補(bǔ)充。
[Abstract]:The academic achievements of humanities and social sciences are different from those of natural sciences, their forms of expression are more diverse, the research period is relatively long, and the evaluation methods are more complicated. For academic books, due to the large circulation of books and the indefinite publication cycle, the number of such factors is relatively mature. The construction of the evaluation system is still worth further discussion. It is hoped that the evaluation practice of the academic achievements of the later funded projects can make some beneficial additions to the construction of the book evaluation system.
【作者單位】： 南京大學(xué)信息管理學(xué)院;
【基金】：國(guó)家社會(huì)科學(xué)基金特別委托項(xiàng)目“國(guó)家社科基金項(xiàng)目成果學(xué)術(shù)影響力評(píng)估”(14@ZH051)階段性成果
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：C12
，

本文編號(hào)：1636590