思想史的界定與門徑——以兩部學(xué)案為例
發(fā)布時間:2018-02-16 18:00
本文關(guān)鍵詞: 思想史 形態(tài) 內(nèi)容 體例 方法 思想史觀 出處:《浙江社會科學(xué)》2010年01期 論文類型:期刊論文
【摘要】:由于研究對象的無形與復(fù)雜,思想史的界定很困難。雖然思想史的研究應(yīng)該是一個開放的領(lǐng)域,但具體的研究卻有待于來自學(xué)術(shù)史的規(guī)定!睹魅鍖W(xué)案》與《宋元學(xué)案》是中國思想史研究中的奠基性著作,本文以這兩部學(xué)案為例,就思想史的形態(tài)與內(nèi)容、體例與方法,以及知識與價值訴求下的不同的思想史觀進(jìn)行了分析。
[Abstract]:Because of the intangibility and complexity of the object of study, it is very difficult to define the history of thought. Although the study of the history of thought should be an open field, However, the specific research has yet to come from the provisions of academic history. "the case of Confucianism in Ming Dynasty" and "the case of Learning in Song and Yuan dynasties" are the foundational works in the study of the history of Chinese ideology. This paper takes these two cases as an example to discuss the form and content, style and method of the history of thought. As well as the knowledge and the value demand under the different thought historical view carries on the analysis.
【作者單位】: 浙江大學(xué)宋學(xué)研究中心;復(fù)旦大學(xué)文史研究院;
【分類號】:C092
,
本文編號:1516109
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/shekelunwen/shgj/1516109.html
最近更新
教材專著