日常生活中“吹牛”現(xiàn)象的社會(huì)學(xué)解析
本文關(guān)鍵詞: 吹牛 行動(dòng)結(jié)構(gòu) 情景分析 原因分析 影響分析 出處:《華中師范大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文 論文類(lèi)型:學(xué)位論文
【摘要】:“吹!笔侨粘I钪薪(jīng)常見(jiàn)到的一種現(xiàn)象,但長(zhǎng)期以來(lái)留給世人的印象卻不能使它贏得人們的好感,荒誕、虛妄、盲目夸張和自我膨脹更是人們對(duì)于吹牛者的評(píng)價(jià)。鑒于以上人們對(duì)于吹,F(xiàn)象所表現(xiàn)出的反應(yīng),本文將從社會(huì)學(xué)的角度出發(fā),深入并細(xì)致考察吹牛事件的形成機(jī)制以及吹牛事件各組成要素的內(nèi)容、特點(diǎn)、影響等,目的在于真實(shí)還原吹牛這一現(xiàn)象,使人們放棄業(yè)已形成的主觀偏見(jiàn),站在客觀公正的立場(chǎng)上正確看待和認(rèn)識(shí)吹牛這一日常生活中常見(jiàn)的現(xiàn)象。 文章主要從以下幾個(gè)部分對(duì)吹,F(xiàn)象進(jìn)行了論述:吹牛含義、吹牛者、吹牛結(jié)構(gòu)、不同情境下的吹牛類(lèi)型分析、吹牛原因以及吹牛影響。文章第一部分主要通過(guò)回顧相關(guān)文獻(xiàn)和資料,介紹了吹牛的含義、由來(lái)以及和吹牛有關(guān)的事件,目的在于引入主題,使讀者對(duì)吹,F(xiàn)象形成初步的了解;第二部分主要圍繞吹牛事件的主體,介紹了吹牛者的來(lái)源和特點(diǎn);第三部分當(dāng)中引用相關(guān)社會(huì)學(xué)知識(shí),結(jié)合社會(huì)學(xué)家帕森斯的行動(dòng)結(jié)構(gòu)模型對(duì)吹牛的具體行動(dòng)結(jié)構(gòu)進(jìn)行了闡釋,目的在于使讀者能夠清晰的了解吹牛事件的具體行動(dòng)過(guò)程,為讀者更好的理解接下來(lái)的情境吹牛過(guò)程做好鋪墊;第四部分通過(guò)社會(huì)學(xué)諸多理論,如齊美爾的幾何社會(huì)學(xué)、戈夫曼的戲劇理論以及情景互動(dòng)理論等對(duì)吹牛進(jìn)行了具體的分類(lèi),并選擇日常生活中的典型吹牛實(shí)例進(jìn)行了闡述和分析;文章最后兩部分分別從吹牛者的吹牛原因和吹牛所產(chǎn)生的影響方面對(duì)其進(jìn)行了說(shuō)明。其中在分析吹牛原因時(shí)通過(guò)社會(huì)價(jià)值觀、人情與面子等因素對(duì)其進(jìn)行了分析,在說(shuō)明吹,F(xiàn)象的影響時(shí)則通過(guò)積極影響和消極影響兩方面對(duì)其進(jìn)行了闡述。 文章最后的總結(jié)部分再次重申,希望通過(guò)以上的論述能夠使人們能夠站在客觀的角度上重新審視吹牛這一日常行為現(xiàn)象。更重要的是,通過(guò)對(duì)吹牛事件的闡述能夠使讀者在將來(lái)的生活中遇到類(lèi)似事件時(shí)能夠形成反思性思維,辯證的看待和認(rèn)識(shí),對(duì)其給予客觀和公正的對(duì)待。
[Abstract]:"Brag" is a phenomenon often seen in daily life, but for a long time for the world impression without causing it to win people's favor, absurdity, exaggeration and falsehood, blind self expansion is more for the evaluation of charlatans. In view of the above people for bragging phenomena exhibited by the reaction, this paper from the perspective of the angle of sociology, in-depth and detailed study of formation mechanism and the content of each element of event event features bragging bragging, influence, to restore the true. This phenomenon makes people abandon the subjective prejudice has been formed, standing in the objective and fair position correctly view and understanding of the daily life. A common phenomenon.
This article mainly from the following parts to brag phenomenon are discussed: bragging meaning, charlatan, bragging structure, analysis of different situations about types, causes and effects. The bragging bragging first part mainly through the review of the relevant literature and data, introduces the origin and meaning of bragging, and brag about the incident, is introduced the theme, giving readers a preliminary understanding of the phenomenon of the second part bragging; bragging around the main event, introduces the sources and characteristics of charlatans; the third part quotes the relevant sociological knowledge, specific action structure combined with the action model of sociologist Parsons boast of the interpretation, aims to enable readers to the specific course of action understand the events can be clearly bragging, for readers to better understand the situation of the next bragging pave the way for the fourth part; Too many sociological theories, such as geometric social Simmel, Goffman's drama theory and scene interaction theory and make a concrete classification to brag, and expounds and analyzes the choice of daily life in the typical example of bragging; the last two parts of this article are from the reasons and effects of bragging bragging of the aspects the instructions on it. The social value in the analysis of causes of bragging view, human relationships and other factors to analyze, in effect that the phenomenon of bragging through positive and negative influence of the two aspects of it.
The last part of the article again, I hope that through the above discussion can enable people to stand in an objective point of view to re-examine the daily bragging behavior. More importantly, the events described bragging to enable readers to encounter similar incidents in the life of the future to the formation of reflective thinking, dialectical view and understanding, give an objective and impartial treatment on it.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:華中師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2013
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】:C912.6
【共引文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前10條
1 尹偉琴;民國(guó)祭田法律制度研究[D];華東政法大學(xué);2010年
2 唐旭天;集團(tuán)公司跨文化管理研究[D];遼寧工程技術(shù)大學(xué);2009年
3 祁峰;和諧社會(huì)視域下中國(guó)城市居家養(yǎng)老研究[D];大連海事大學(xué);2010年
4 趙書(shū)松;動(dòng)機(jī)視角的績(jī)效考核對(duì)員工知識(shí)共享影響研究[D];華中科技大學(xué);2010年
5 賴(lài)瑛;珠江三角洲廣府民系祠堂建筑研究[D];華南理工大學(xué);2010年
6 褚連波;湘西文化與沈從文的小說(shuō)創(chuàng)作[D];東北師范大學(xué);2010年
7 喬時(shí);顧客與服務(wù)提供者關(guān)系對(duì)顧客參與中的自我服務(wù)偏見(jiàn)的影響研究[D];南開(kāi)大學(xué);2010年
8 韓振華;人際信任的影響因素及其機(jī)制研究[D];南開(kāi)大學(xué);2010年
9 王忠春;清代無(wú)訟思想研究[D];南開(kāi)大學(xué);2010年
10 王艷紅;美國(guó)黑人英語(yǔ)漢譯研究[D];南開(kāi)大學(xué);2010年
,本文編號(hào):1493992
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/shekelunwen/shgj/1493992.html