本文關(guān)鍵詞：城市化、社會保障支出與城鄉(xiāng)收入差距——來自中國省級面板數(shù)據(jù)的經(jīng)驗證據(jù)，，由筆耕文化傳播整理發(fā)布。

城市化、社會保障支出與城鄉(xiāng)收入差距——來自中國省級面板數(shù)據(jù)的經(jīng)驗證據(jù)

An Empirical Study on Urban- Rural Income Gap, Urbanization and Social Security Expenditure in China

[1] [2]

YU Ju, LIU Xin （ College of Economics and Trade, Chongqing University of Technology, Chongqing 400050, China ）

重慶理工大學(xué)經(jīng)濟(jì)與貿(mào)易學(xué)院,中國重慶400050

文章摘要：采用1997-2011年面板數(shù)據(jù)的變截距及變系數(shù)模型，對中國30個省市的城市化率、社會保障支出與城鄉(xiāng)收入差距之間的關(guān)系進(jìn)行實證分析。結(jié)果顯示：就全國而言，城市化率、社會保障支出與城鄉(xiāng)收入差距呈正相關(guān)；就地區(qū)而言，大部分地區(qū)城市化率的提高擴(kuò)大了城鄉(xiāng)收入差距，而半數(shù)以上的地區(qū)其社會保障支出對城鄉(xiāng)收入差距的縮小有一定促進(jìn)作用，但不同地區(qū)其影響呈現(xiàn)一定的差異性。其政策含義在于，可通過建立城市反哺農(nóng)村機制和完善社會保障體系來縮小城鄉(xiāng)收入差距，促進(jìn)社會公平。

Abstr：Based on 1997 - 201 1panel data model with variable coefficients, an empirical study on urban-rural income gap,urbanization and social security expenditure of the 30 provinces in China has been conducted. The study shows that, tbr the country as a whole, it is not beneficial for urbanization and social security expendina＇e to remarkably narrow urban- rural income gap. For the specific provinces, it is not beneficial for urbanization to remarkably narrow urban-rural income gap in most regions, and it is beneficial for social security expenditure of more than half of the provinces to remarkably narrow urban-rural income gap. But the effect of different regions shows some differences. The policy implication is that, through the establishment of regurgitation-feeding mechanism between urban and rural areas and improving the social se- curity system,it can narrow the income gap between urban and rural areas and promote social fairness.

文章關(guān)鍵詞：

Keyword：:urban-rural income gap social security expenditure urbanization panel data China

課題項目：教育部人文社會科學(xué)規(guī)劃項目（11YJA790091）

作者信息：會員可見

  本文關(guān)鍵詞：城市化、社會保障支出與城鄉(xiāng)收入差距——來自中國省級面板數(shù)據(jù)的經(jīng)驗證據(jù)，由筆耕文化傳播整理發(fā)布。