本文選題：轉(zhuǎn)型期 + 中國(guó)　； 參考：《鄭州大學(xué)》2016年博士論文

【摘要】：維護(hù)社會(huì)治安是國(guó)家的基本職能,是人民對(duì)自己生存環(huán)境的基本期盼,是衡量政府治理能力的基本尺度,是推進(jìn)改革發(fā)展的基本前提。當(dāng)前,由于在轉(zhuǎn)型期經(jīng)濟(jì)、政治、文化、社會(huì)多重因素的發(fā)展變化,由此帶來(lái)的關(guān)系調(diào)整和利益矛盾,時(shí)常以影響社會(huì)治安穩(wěn)定的形式表現(xiàn)出來(lái)。本文以整體性治理理論為分析工具,主要運(yùn)用系統(tǒng)研究法、文獻(xiàn)分析法、比較研究法、問(wèn)卷調(diào)查法,對(duì)我國(guó)社會(huì)治安治理體制的歷史演進(jìn)、困境表征、“碎片化”生成機(jī)理及整體性創(chuàng)新策略等問(wèn)題進(jìn)行了分析探究,提出了具有一定創(chuàng)新的思路、見解和觀點(diǎn)。全文共分六章。第一章緒論,闡述了論文的選題背景、研究意義、關(guān)于社會(huì)治安治理的國(guó)內(nèi)外研究現(xiàn)狀、重要概念的界定、理論工具與研究方法、論文框架、創(chuàng)新之處等問(wèn)題。第二章轉(zhuǎn)型期中國(guó)社會(huì)治安治理歷程與發(fā)展特點(diǎn)。分析了社會(huì)轉(zhuǎn)型中的結(jié)構(gòu)轉(zhuǎn)換、機(jī)制轉(zhuǎn)軌、利益調(diào)整、觀念轉(zhuǎn)變對(duì)社會(huì)治安治理所帶來(lái)的挑戰(zhàn),論述了轉(zhuǎn)型期背景與社會(huì)治安治理的相關(guān)性。按照我國(guó)社會(huì)轉(zhuǎn)型的標(biāo)志性事件,將社會(huì)治安治理實(shí)踐歷程劃分為傳統(tǒng)治理模式瓦解破碎時(shí)期、混合治理模式探索運(yùn)行時(shí)期、現(xiàn)代化治理模式初步建立時(shí)期等三個(gè)階段,系統(tǒng)回顧了改革開放以來(lái)我國(guó)社會(huì)治安治理實(shí)踐的歷史脈絡(luò),從政治、經(jīng)濟(jì)、文化、社會(huì)共四個(gè)角度對(duì)其歷史演變的基本特點(diǎn)進(jìn)行了分析,提出為適應(yīng)轉(zhuǎn)型期我國(guó)政治體制由人治向法治,經(jīng)濟(jì)結(jié)構(gòu)由封閉向開放,思想意識(shí)由一元向多元,社會(huì)形態(tài)從靜態(tài)向動(dòng)態(tài)的變化,社會(huì)治安治理模式也呈現(xiàn)出治理方式法治化、治理理念服務(wù)化、執(zhí)法手段謙抑化、防控格局立體化等特點(diǎn)。第三章轉(zhuǎn)型期中國(guó)社會(huì)治安的基本狀況。該部分對(duì)改革開放以來(lái)我國(guó)每年刑事案件、治安案件、群體性事件的發(fā)案趨勢(shì)、特點(diǎn)進(jìn)行了深入分析。從傳統(tǒng)治安問(wèn)題、新型治安問(wèn)題及社會(huì)公眾的認(rèn)同程度等三個(gè)方面深入分析了當(dāng)前我國(guó)社會(huì)治安嚴(yán)峻形勢(shì)的外在表現(xiàn)及社會(huì)治安治理面臨的困境。采取調(diào)查問(wèn)卷的辦法,對(duì)一定數(shù)量的社會(huì)公眾和公安民警進(jìn)行問(wèn)卷調(diào)查分析,從問(wèn)卷參與者的主觀感受印證了治理困境的客觀存在,對(duì)其構(gòu)成因素的重要程度進(jìn)行了初步分析。第四章轉(zhuǎn)型期中國(guó)社會(huì)治安的治理困境。該部分運(yùn)用整體性治理理論工具,從主體、認(rèn)知、體制等三個(gè)方面分析了社會(huì)治安治理困境的產(chǎn)生機(jī)理,提出造成社會(huì)治安治理困境的主要因素有三個(gè)方面:一是主體因素,如公安機(jī)關(guān)不堪重負(fù)、部門治理缺乏合作、多元治理結(jié)構(gòu)尚未形成;二是認(rèn)知因素,如缺乏整體思考、缺乏公平公正精神、缺乏不斷創(chuàng)新意識(shí);三是體制因素,如職能、政策、資源、利益關(guān)系等方面的碎片化等等。通過(guò)以上分析為后續(xù)的路徑選擇提供了基礎(chǔ)。第五章國(guó)外社會(huì)治安治理的成功范例。該部分對(duì)英國(guó)、法國(guó)、瑞典、美國(guó)、加拿大、日本、新加坡等七個(gè)國(guó)家的相關(guān)經(jīng)驗(yàn)進(jìn)行介紹分析,介紹了英國(guó)不斷推進(jìn)警務(wù)體制改革、實(shí)現(xiàn)警力無(wú)增長(zhǎng)前提下實(shí)戰(zhàn)力提升的經(jīng)驗(yàn),法國(guó)探索公眾參與新形式、提升重大決策科學(xué)性的經(jīng)驗(yàn),瑞典完善社會(huì)保障體系、積極消除貧富差距的經(jīng)驗(yàn);美國(guó)加強(qiáng)經(jīng)費(fèi)投入、增強(qiáng)街面巡邏密度和實(shí)施零容忍政策的經(jīng)驗(yàn)、加拿大加強(qiáng)社會(huì)福利建設(shè)、增強(qiáng)警察執(zhí)法權(quán)威性的經(jīng)驗(yàn)、日本“交番相談員制度”推動(dòng)警民關(guān)系優(yōu)化、增多社會(huì)治安治理積極因素的經(jīng)驗(yàn)以及新加坡推進(jìn)議員聯(lián)系選民制度、及時(shí)化解社會(huì)矛盾糾紛的經(jīng)驗(yàn)。分析了國(guó)外經(jīng)驗(yàn)對(duì)提升中國(guó)社會(huì)治安治理水平的啟示意義。第六章我國(guó)社會(huì)治安治理創(chuàng)新的路徑選擇。從治理理念、組織體系、生態(tài)環(huán)境、關(guān)鍵環(huán)節(jié)、支撐體系等五個(gè)方面對(duì)中國(guó)社會(huì)治安治理的整體創(chuàng)新提出了決策建議。最后為結(jié)論與展望,本章總結(jié)了論文研究情況,對(duì)未來(lái)研究方向作了展望。與同類研究相比,本文的創(chuàng)新主要體現(xiàn)在四個(gè)方面:1、研究選題。作者搜索目前國(guó)內(nèi)文獻(xiàn)發(fā)現(xiàn),以“社會(huì)治安治理”為題的研究尚不多見。原有的相關(guān)研究多從“社會(huì)治安綜合治理”或“社會(huì)治安管理”的角度展開。當(dāng)前,我國(guó)政府提出要全面推進(jìn)國(guó)家治理體系和治理能力現(xiàn)代化。在這一背景下,運(yùn)用當(dāng)代“治理理論”的思維方法,系統(tǒng)研究“社會(huì)治安治理”問(wèn)題,具有重要的現(xiàn)實(shí)意義與理論意義。2、理論工具。整體性治理理論的產(chǎn)生環(huán)境與我國(guó)社會(huì)背景比較相近。運(yùn)用整體性治理理論研究社會(huì)治安治理具有高度契合性。為此,本文以其為理論工具,審視和分析我國(guó)社會(huì)治安治理在主體、職能、政策、資源等方面的“碎片化”問(wèn)題;還運(yùn)用社會(huì)控制理論、社會(huì)失范理論剖析了轉(zhuǎn)型期對(duì)社會(huì)治安治理的影響。均具有一定拓新價(jià)值。3、學(xué)術(shù)觀點(diǎn)。本文在綜合公共管理學(xué)、法學(xué)等基礎(chǔ)理論的基礎(chǔ)上,運(yùn)用理論分析與實(shí)證調(diào)研方法,分析了社會(huì)轉(zhuǎn)型期治安治理面臨的全新挑戰(zhàn),探討了社會(huì)建設(shè)與社會(huì)治安治理的內(nèi)在聯(lián)系,揭示了社會(huì)治安治理困境的深刻社會(huì)根源,進(jìn)而提出其治理之道必須從宏觀視野入手,努力消除產(chǎn)生社會(huì)治安治理困境的外在根源,維護(hù)良好的社會(huì)治安治理生態(tài)環(huán)境。這些學(xué)術(shù)觀點(diǎn)具有創(chuàng)新性。4、對(duì)策建議。在借鑒國(guó)外經(jīng)驗(yàn)基礎(chǔ)上,本文緊扣中國(guó)國(guó)情,提出“優(yōu)化治理理念”、“理順組織體系”、“改善生態(tài)環(huán)境”、“突出關(guān)鍵環(huán)節(jié)”、“完善支撐體系”等“五位一體”的策略,以破解我國(guó)社會(huì)治安治理困境,實(shí)現(xiàn)社會(huì)治安治理整體性創(chuàng)新。這些對(duì)策建議有一定的政策參考價(jià)值。
[Abstract]:Maintaining social security is the basic function of the state, the basic expectation of the people to their own living environment, the basic yardstick of the government's ability to measure governance and the basic prerequisite for the promotion of the reform and development. At present, due to the changes in the economic, political, cultural and social factors in the transition period, the relationship adjustment and the contradiction of interests bring about, often In the form of influencing the stability of social security, this paper uses the holistic governance theory as an analytical tool, mainly using system research, literature analysis, comparative research, and questionnaire investigation. The historical evolution of the social security governance system in China, the characterization of the dilemma, the formation mechanism of "fragmentation" and the overall innovation strategy are carried out. Analysis and exploration, put forward some innovative ideas, views and views. The full text is divided into six chapters. The first chapter is divided into six chapters. The first chapter is the introduction, which describes the background of the topic, the research significance, the domestic and foreign research status of the social security governance, the definition of the important concepts, the theoretical tools and research methods, the paper framework, the innovation and so on. The second chapter transformation The history and characteristics of social security governance in China, and the analysis of the challenges brought about by the transformation of structure, mechanism, interest adjustment and concept change to social security governance in social transformation, and the correlation between the background of the transition period and the governance of social security, and the practice calendar of social security management in accordance with the landmark events of the social transformation of our country The process is divided into three stages: the traditional governance mode disintegration period, the mixed governance model exploring operation period, the preliminary establishment period of modern governance mode, and so on. It systematically reviews the historical context of the practice of social security governance in China since the reform and opening up, and the basic characteristics of its historical evolution from the four angles of politics, economy, culture and society. In order to adapt to the transition period, the political system from the rule of man to the rule of law, the economic structure from the closed to the open, the ideological consciousness from one yuan to the pluralistic, the social form from the static to the dynamic, the social security governance mode also presents the rule of law, the management concept service, the law enforcement means modesty, prevention and control pattern stereoscopic The third chapter is the basic situation of social security in China during the transition period. This part analyses the trend and characteristics of criminal cases, public order cases and group events since the reform and opening up in China, and analyzes the current situation in three aspects, such as the problems of traditional public security, new public security problems and the degree of social public identification. The external manifestation of the severe situation of social security in China and the predicament of social security governance are faced. A questionnaire survey is adopted to conduct a questionnaire survey on a certain number of public and public security police, and the objective existence of the governance dilemma is confirmed by the subjective feelings of the participants, and the importance of the factors is preliminarily carried out. The fourth chapter in the transition period of China's Social Security Governance Dilemma. This part uses the holistic governance theory tool to analyze the formation mechanism of the social security governance dilemma from the three aspects of the main body, the cognition and the system, and puts forward that there are three main factors that cause the dilemma of social Security Governance: the first is the main factors, such as the unbearable weight of the public security organs. Negative, Department governance lack of cooperation, multiple governance structure has not yet formed; two is the cognitive factors, such as the lack of overall thinking, lack of fair and fair spirit, lack of continuous innovation consciousness; three is the fragmentation of system factors, such as functions, policies, resources, interest relations and so on. Through the above analysis for the follow-up path selection provides the basis. Fifth This part introduces the experience of seven countries, such as Britain, France, Sweden, the United States, Canada, Japan, Singapore and other countries, and introduces the experience of advancing the reform of the police system and realizing the improvement of the force without the growth of police force, and the French exploration of the new form of public participation and the promotion of the promotion of public participation. With the scientific experience of decision-making, Sweden consumes the social security system and actively eliminates the experience of the gap between the rich and the poor; the United States strengthens the fund investment, strengthens the street patrol density and the implementation of the zero tolerance policy; Canada strengthens the social welfare construction and strengthens the authority of the police law enforcement. To optimize the experience of increasing the positive factors of social security governance and the experience of promoting the system of connecting the voters with the voters in Singapore and resolving the social contradictions and disputes in time. The Enlightenment of foreign experience on improving the level of social security management in China is analyzed. The sixth chapter is the path choice of the innovation of social security governance in China. Department, ecological environment, key link, support system and other five aspects of the overall innovation of China's social security management proposed a decision. Finally, the conclusion and prospect, this chapter summarizes the research situation of the thesis, and looks forward to the future research direction. Compared with the same kind of research, the innovation of this paper is mainly embodied in four aspects: 1, research topic selection. The research on the current domestic literature finds that the research on "social security governance" is rarely seen. The original related research is mostly from the perspective of "comprehensive management of public security" or "social security management". At present, our government has proposed to promote the modernization of the national governance system and the ability of governance in an all-round way. The thinking method of the contemporary "governance theory" and the systematic study of the problem of "social security governance" have important practical and theoretical significance.2, theoretical tool. The production environment of the holistic governance theory is close to the social background of our country. Using the holistic governance theory to study the social security governance of the society is highly compatible. Taking it as a theoretical tool, it examines and analyzes the "fragmentation" of social security governance in the subjects, functions, policies and resources, and uses social control theory and social anomie theory to analyze the influence of the transition period on social security governance. All of them have a new value.3, academic viewpoint. This article is in the comprehensive public management, law. On the basis of the basic theory of learning and other basic theories, this paper analyzes the new challenges facing the public security governance during the social transition period, probes into the internal relations between social construction and social security management, reveals the profound social root of the dilemma of social security governance, and advances that the way for its governance must start with the macro vision. Efforts should be made to eliminate the external causes of the dilemma of social security governance and maintain good social security and ecological environment. These academic views have innovative.4 and countermeasures. Based on the experience of foreign countries, this paper puts forward "optimal governance concept", "rationalize the organizational system", "improve the ecological environment" and "improve the ecological environment", and "improve the ecological environment", and "improve the ecological environment". "Key links", "perfect support system" and "five in one" strategy, in order to solve the dilemma of social security governance in our country, and realize the overall innovation of social security governance. These countermeasures have some policy reference value.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：鄭州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：博士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2016
【分類號(hào)】：D631.4
，

本文編號(hào)：1928240