本文選題：農村低保 + 底線救助�。� 參考：《政治學研究》2017年03期

【摘要】：社會保障資源的合理配置是國家再分配能力的重要體現(xiàn)。當前,農村低保制度的實踐,出現(xiàn)國家不斷增加公共資源投入而農民的福利狀態(tài)、基層的社會秩序并未同步改善的悖論。低保制度的泛福利化是理解這一制度悖論的關鍵。以福利擴散和福利捆綁為特征的泛福利化,使低保制度背離底線救助的制度定位,造成低保指標在基層分配的困境,影響社會保障體系的良性運轉,更使社會公平的價值目標遭受巨大沖擊。國家再分配能力的增強,有賴于社會保障資源的持續(xù)增加,但更需要進行制度建設以合理配置資源。具體而言,農村的社會保障體系要逐漸從過分倚重低保制度的單軌道運行,走向分工明確、多軌道運行的綜合性保障制度,即一方面恢復低保的底線救助屬性,另一方面完善專項救助制度,促成社會保障體系的均衡發(fā)展。
[Abstract]:The rational allocation of social security resources is an important embodiment of national redistribution ability. At present, in the practice of the rural minimum security system, there is a paradox that the state of the country is increasing the public resource input and the farmers' welfare state, and the social order at the grass-roots level has not been improved synchronously. The pan-welfare of the minimum security system is the key to understand the paradox of the system. The pan-welfare, which is characterized by welfare diffusion and welfare bundling, makes the minimum guarantee system deviate from the system orientation of the bottom line, and causes the plight of the distribution of the minimum guarantee index at the grass-roots level, which affects the benign operation of the social security system. Moreover, the value goal of social equity has suffered a great impact. The strengthening of national redistribution ability depends on the continuous increase of social security resources, but it is more necessary to carry on the system construction in order to allocate the resources reasonably. In particular, the social security system in rural areas should gradually move from relying too heavily on the single-track operation of the minimum security system to a comprehensive security system with a clear division of labor and multi-track operation, that is, on the one hand, to restore the bottom line relief attribute of the minimum living standard. On the other hand, perfect special aid system, promote the balanced development of social security system.
【作者單位】： 華中科技大學中國鄉(xiāng)村治理研究中心;
【基金】：民政部社會救助司委托課題“農村低收入家庭、支出性貧困家庭認定策略和支持政策研究”的研究成果
【分類號】：F323.89

【相似文獻】

相關期刊論文 前5條

1 ;微言E語[J];人才資源開發(fā);2012年06期

2 ;南京公車改革貨幣化但不“福利化”[J];領導決策信息;2005年47期

3 劉澤州;;中小企業(yè)培訓福利化中的問題及對策[J];中小企業(yè)管理與科技(上旬刊);2013年11期

4 馬流輝;;農地福利化:實踐機制、后果呈現(xiàn)及其優(yōu)化路徑——以滬郊埭村為個案的初步分析[J];南京農業(yè)大學學報(社會科學版);2013年06期

5 ;[J];;年期

相關重要報紙文章 前3條

1 上海理工大學公共管理研究所 王波;養(yǎng)老：可否超越市場化和福利化之爭[N];解放日報;2009年

2 蔡紅東;發(fā)展養(yǎng)老服務業(yè)應將產業(yè)化和福利化有機結合[N];中國審計報;2013年

3 龔震;婚檢應當福利化[N];經濟參考報;2004年

，

本文編號：1853659