本文選題：社會(huì)保障水平　切入點(diǎn)：綜合評(píng)價(jià)　出處：《南京財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué)》2012年碩士論文

【摘要】：社會(huì)保障制度被譽(yù)為社會(huì)的“自動(dòng)穩(wěn)定器”,在縮小社會(huì)貧富差距、建立和諧社會(huì)的過(guò)程中承擔(dān)著極其重要的責(zé)任。中國(guó)與社會(huì)主義市場(chǎng)經(jīng)濟(jì)體制相適應(yīng)的社會(huì)保障制度體系在經(jīng)過(guò)十多年的改革和發(fā)展之后，我們需要對(duì)目前的社會(huì)保障制度建設(shè)狀況和水平有一個(gè)清醒的認(rèn)識(shí)，做出科學(xué)的綜合評(píng)價(jià)，為今后的社會(huì)保障改革積累經(jīng)驗(yàn)，找準(zhǔn)方向。但我國(guó)現(xiàn)階段對(duì)社會(huì)保障水平綜合評(píng)價(jià)的理論和認(rèn)識(shí)還沒(méi)有形成共識(shí)，所采用的分析方法簡(jiǎn)單粗糙，其評(píng)價(jià)更沒(méi)有成為常態(tài)化。各省之間懸殊的社會(huì)保障差異嚴(yán)重制約著相關(guān)制度的全國(guó)統(tǒng)籌，也影響到整個(gè)社會(huì)保障制度的建設(shè)和完善。在這種背景下，對(duì)我國(guó)各省社會(huì)保障水平綜合評(píng)價(jià)進(jìn)行研究具有重要的理論和現(xiàn)實(shí)意義。 首先，本文以歷史唯物主義、公共物品以及城鄉(xiāng)統(tǒng)籌發(fā)展等理論為指導(dǎo)，依據(jù)我國(guó)社會(huì)保障制度的實(shí)際構(gòu)成，并且緊密結(jié)合我國(guó)現(xiàn)階段社會(huì)保障統(tǒng)計(jì)實(shí)踐，采取先分后總、逐項(xiàng)逐層的方法，按照社會(huì)保障整體、社會(huì)保險(xiǎn)、社會(huì)救助、社會(huì)福利、就業(yè)促進(jìn)和住房保障六大塊社會(huì)保障制度內(nèi)容，建立了三個(gè)層次、35個(gè)指標(biāo)的社會(huì)保障水平綜合評(píng)價(jià)體系。其次，按照所建立的指標(biāo)體系，通過(guò)中國(guó)統(tǒng)計(jì)年鑒、中國(guó)勞動(dòng)統(tǒng)計(jì)年鑒、中國(guó)衛(wèi)生統(tǒng)計(jì)年鑒、中國(guó)財(cái)政統(tǒng)計(jì)年鑒以及相關(guān)的統(tǒng)計(jì)公報(bào)等渠道，收集其數(shù)據(jù)，，并對(duì)所選取的指標(biāo)數(shù)據(jù)按照其正、逆方向和適度三類進(jìn)行同方向可比性技術(shù)處理。在此基礎(chǔ)之上，運(yùn)用層次分析與灰色關(guān)聯(lián)度相結(jié)合的定量分析方法，對(duì)全國(guó)31個(gè)省份的社會(huì)保障水平進(jìn)行綜合評(píng)價(jià)，得出2009年各省的社會(huì)保障水平綜合排序：遼寧省和上海市分列第一和第二位，廣西、貴州、新疆為后三位。在對(duì)全國(guó)31個(gè)省份社會(huì)保障水平綜合評(píng)價(jià)的同時(shí)，本文還揭示了31個(gè)省份在各個(gè)不同社會(huì)保障項(xiàng)目上的分值水平。最后，本文采用SWOT態(tài)勢(shì)分析法，分析了31個(gè)省份在社會(huì)保障制度構(gòu)成項(xiàng)目方面的優(yōu)勢(shì)和薄弱環(huán)節(jié)，并選取5個(gè)具有典型意義的省份有針對(duì)性地提出各省份今后社會(huì)保障工作的重點(diǎn)方向，以及提升各省乃至全國(guó)社會(huì)保障水平的對(duì)策、方法和建議。
[Abstract]:The social security system is praised as the "automatic stabilizer" of the society, which bears the extremely important responsibility in the process of narrowing the gap between the rich and the poor and building a harmonious society.After more than a decade of reform and development, we need to have a clear understanding of the current situation and level of the construction of the social security system in China, which is compatible with the socialist market economic system.Make a scientific comprehensive evaluation, for the future social security reform to accumulate experience, find the right direction.However, there is no consensus on the theory and understanding of the comprehensive evaluation of social security level in our country at the present stage, and the analytical methods used are simple and rough, and the evaluation of the comprehensive evaluation has not become a norm.The disparity of social security between provinces seriously restricts the national coordination of relevant systems, and also affects the construction and improvement of the whole social security system.Under this background, it is of great theoretical and practical significance to study the comprehensive evaluation of social security level in various provinces of China.First of all, under the guidance of historical materialism, public goods and the overall development of urban and rural areas, according to the actual composition of China's social security system, and in close combination with the current statistical practice of social security in China, this paper adopts the principle of dividing first and then overall.One by one, according to the social security system as a whole, social insurance, social assistance, social welfare, employment promotion and housing security,Established three levels, 35 indicators of social security level comprehensive evaluation system.Secondly, according to the established index system, the data are collected through the channels of the China Statistical Yearbook, the China Labor Statistics Yearbook, the China Health Statistics Yearbook, the China Financial Statistics Yearbook and relevant statistical bulletins.According to the positive, inverse and moderate three kinds of index data, the same direction comparability technique is carried out.On this basis, the comprehensive evaluation of the social security level of 31 provinces in China is carried out by using the quantitative analysis method which combines the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) with the grey correlation degree.The comprehensive ranking of the social security level of the provinces in 2009 was as follows: Liaoning Province and Shanghai ranked first and second respectively, Guangxi, Guizhou and Xinjiang were the last three.In addition to the comprehensive evaluation of the social security level in the 31 provinces of China, the paper also reveals the scores of the 31 provinces in different social security projects.Finally, using SWOT situation analysis, this paper analyzes the advantages and disadvantages of the social security system in 31 provinces.Five provinces with typical significance are selected to point out the key directions of the future social security work in each province, as well as the countermeasures, methods and suggestions to improve the social security level of the provinces and even the whole country.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：南京財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號(hào)】：D632.1;F224

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 韓學(xué)平;芮筱亭;趙革;;多決策目標(biāo)排序的層次分析與灰色關(guān)聯(lián)法[J];火力與指揮控制;2009年09期

2 王行暉;大學(xué)生成績(jī)排序中的灰色關(guān)聯(lián)度分析法[J];教育與現(xiàn)代化;1998年04期

3 張瑛;;最低生活保障制度的效率分析[J];金陵科技學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2008年04期

4 李瑛珊;對(duì)我國(guó)社會(huì)保障統(tǒng)計(jì)指標(biāo)體系的整體設(shè)計(jì)研究[J];江蘇統(tǒng)計(jì);2003年06期

5 梁金剛;;論社會(huì)保障水平的幾個(gè)問(wèn)題[J];勞動(dòng)保障世界;2008年11期

6 朱慶芳;社會(huì)保障事業(yè)的發(fā)展與1990年各地區(qū)評(píng)價(jià)[J];社會(huì)科學(xué)輯刊;1992年05期

7 朱慶芳;1993年各省市區(qū)社會(huì)保障水平的比較與評(píng)價(jià)[J];社會(huì)科學(xué)研究;1995年05期

8 段婕;林偉;;社會(huì)保障空間水平的實(shí)證研究[J];統(tǒng)計(jì)與決策;2007年06期

9 李瑛珊;;美德兩國(guó)社會(huì)保障統(tǒng)計(jì)指標(biāo)體系的比較及對(duì)我國(guó)的啟示[J];統(tǒng)計(jì)與決策;2008年24期

10 林治芬;社會(huì)保障統(tǒng)計(jì)初探[J];統(tǒng)計(jì)教育;1995年03期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 張延輝;我國(guó)殘疾人社會(huì)保障制度績(jī)效評(píng)價(jià)研究[D];吉林大學(xué);2008年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前5條

1 徐紅芬;我國(guó)社會(huì)保障水平及適度水平的統(tǒng)計(jì)研究[D];湖南大學(xué);2005年

2 周蕊;江蘇城鎮(zhèn)社會(huì)養(yǎng)老保險(xiǎn)水平的測(cè)定與分析[D];南京理工大學(xué);2006年

3 李建麗;我國(guó)社會(huì)保障水平區(qū)域差異研究[D];西北師范大學(xué);2009年

4 楊岳;中國(guó)社會(huì)保障評(píng)價(jià)指標(biāo)體系實(shí)證研究[D];北京工商大學(xué);2009年

5 柴士改;我國(guó)社會(huì)保障績(jī)效評(píng)價(jià)實(shí)證分析[D];江西財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué);2009年

本文編號(hào)：1715720