本文關(guān)鍵詞： 集體經(jīng)營(yíng)性建設(shè)用地使用權(quán) 入市 國(guó)有建設(shè)用地 土地征收制度　出處：《安徽財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：經(jīng)過(guò)幾十年的堅(jiān)持與努力,我國(guó)社會(huì)的方方面面產(chǎn)生了深刻的變革,社會(huì)面貌幡然一新,社會(huì)生產(chǎn)力進(jìn)步了不少,工業(yè)化進(jìn)程穩(wěn)步加快,城市規(guī)模的擴(kuò)張也在如火如荼地進(jìn)行著。隨之而來(lái)的是,大規(guī)模的城市擴(kuò)張對(duì)在客觀上需要大量的建設(shè)用地,但是目前所擁有的國(guó)有建設(shè)用地?cái)?shù)量是一定的,已經(jīng)越來(lái)越供應(yīng)不了城市擴(kuò)展所需要的大量土地資源。在這個(gè)大環(huán)境下,人們將目光紛紛轉(zhuǎn)而投向農(nóng)村的建設(shè)用地,不斷發(fā)掘它潛在的價(jià)值以解決目前的困境,因而集體經(jīng)營(yíng)性建設(shè)用地使用權(quán)入市能夠減輕建設(shè)用地資源不足的壓力,減輕城市發(fā)展的負(fù)擔(dān)。然而,在我國(guó),其使用權(quán)入市缺乏相關(guān)法律法規(guī)的支持,要想入市得先由國(guó)家利用征收手段將其轉(zhuǎn)化為國(guó)有土地,而后才能入市參與市場(chǎng)交易。但是在實(shí)踐活動(dòng)中,由于房地產(chǎn)市場(chǎng)的巨大利潤(rùn),一些地方政府總是打著公共利益的名義濫用土地征收制度,用很低廉的價(jià)格強(qiáng)制征收農(nóng)村的集體土地進(jìn)而轉(zhuǎn)變?yōu)閲?guó)有土地,再用較高的價(jià)格進(jìn)行出讓,賺取高額的差價(jià),損害了農(nóng)民的土地權(quán)益,此種做法往往受到社會(huì)各界的批評(píng)與指責(zé)。眾所周知,土地改革一直以來(lái)都是國(guó)家重點(diǎn)工作之一,黨的十八屆三中全會(huì)鼓勵(lì)與支持集體經(jīng)營(yíng)性建設(shè)用地使用權(quán)入市。因此,部分地方政府也紛紛響應(yīng)國(guó)家的號(hào)召,出臺(tái)了一系列地方政策性文件。值得一提的是,其推廣范圍越來(lái)越大,發(fā)展至今已經(jīng)推行至30多個(gè)地區(qū),其在不久的將來(lái)將會(huì)推廣至全國(guó)范圍內(nèi)。雖然有國(guó)家政策與一些地方政府政策性文件的支持與指導(dǎo),但是這項(xiàng)工作是一項(xiàng)長(zhǎng)期復(fù)雜的工程,各地試點(diǎn)實(shí)踐中也會(huì)出現(xiàn)諸多問(wèn)題,這就需要我們密切關(guān)注各試點(diǎn)實(shí)際推行狀況,及時(shí)發(fā)現(xiàn)問(wèn)題并總結(jié)積累經(jīng)驗(yàn),為以后在全國(guó)范圍內(nèi)實(shí)行奠定夯實(shí)的基石。當(dāng)然,這項(xiàng)推廣工作不能只依靠國(guó)家政策與地方性文件的指導(dǎo),國(guó)家政策與指導(dǎo)性文件只能在宏觀上提供一個(gè)大的發(fā)展方向,而制定具體可行的操作辦法、破除相關(guān)法律法規(guī)的障礙以及構(gòu)建相關(guān)的配套制度必不可少。規(guī)范這項(xiàng)推廣工作,能夠保護(hù)耕地安全,盡可能地充分使用土地資源不至于使其閑置或者浪費(fèi),保障農(nóng)民的土地權(quán)益不受侵犯,這是推動(dòng)農(nóng)村集體經(jīng)濟(jì)前進(jìn)的重要?jiǎng)恿�。本文主要由三個(gè)部分的內(nèi)容構(gòu)成的:第一部分主要包括概念界定、詳細(xì)闡述理論基礎(chǔ)及政策演進(jìn),建立本文理論研究的基石。第二部分是著重研究存在的問(wèn)題,主要分析法律制度上、實(shí)踐規(guī)則中以及土地規(guī)劃、農(nóng)村社保、土地征收制度等配套制度等方面存在的不足與缺陷,多角度、更全面地找出入市出現(xiàn)的種種問(wèn)題與困境。第三部分是在前兩部分內(nèi)容的研究基礎(chǔ)上,對(duì)其入市規(guī)則提出完善建議,主要包括消除法律障礙、健全實(shí)踐規(guī)則以及完善配套制度等。
[Abstract]:After decades of persistence and efforts, profound changes have taken place in all aspects of our society, with a new social outlook, considerable progress in social productive forces, and steady acceleration of the process of industrialization. The expansion of urban scale is also in full swing. With it, large-scale urban expansion requires a large amount of construction land objectively, but the amount of state-owned construction land currently owned is certain. It has become increasingly difficult to supply the vast amount of land needed for urban expansion. In this environment, people are turning their attention to rural construction land and unlocking its potential value to solve the current predicament. Therefore, entering the market of collective operating construction land use right can reduce the pressure of insufficient construction land resources and lighten the burden of urban development. However, in our country, the right to use construction land to enter the market lacks the support of relevant laws and regulations. In order to enter the market, the state must first use the means of expropriation to convert it into state-owned land before it can enter the market to participate in market transactions. But in practice, because of the huge profits of the real estate market, Some local governments have always abused the land expropriation system in the name of public interest, forcibly expropriating rural collective land at very low prices and then converting it into state-owned land, and then selling it at a higher price to earn a high price difference. This kind of practice is often criticized and criticized by all walks of life in society. As we all know, land reform has always been one of the key tasks of the state. The third Plenary session of the 18 CPC Central Committee encouraged and supported the introduction of the right to the use of collective operating construction land. As a result, some local governments have responded to the call of the state and issued a series of local policy documents. It is worth mentioning that, It has been extended to more than 30 regions and will be extended to the whole country in the near future. Although it has the support and guidance of national policies and some local government policy documents, However, this work is a long-term complex project, and there will be many problems in the practice of pilot projects in various localities. This requires us to pay close attention to the actual implementation of each pilot project, to find problems in time and to sum up and accumulate experience. Of course, this extension cannot rely solely on the guidance of national policies and local documents, which can only provide a broad development direction at the macro level. It is essential to formulate concrete and feasible operation methods, to break down the obstacles of relevant laws and regulations and to build relevant supporting systems. Standardizing this extension work can protect the safety of cultivated land. The full use of land resources as far as possible will not cause them to be idle or wasteful, so as to ensure that peasants' land rights and interests are not infringed, This paper is composed of three parts: the first part mainly includes the definition of the concept, the detailed elaboration of the theoretical basis and the evolution of the policy. The second part focuses on the existing problems, mainly analyzes the deficiencies and defects in the legal system, practical rules and supporting systems such as land planning, rural social security, land expropriation system, etc. In the third part, on the basis of the research of the first two parts, the author puts forward some suggestions on how to perfect the rules of entering the market, mainly including eliminating the legal obstacles. Perfect the practice rule and perfect the supporting system and so on.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：安徽財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：D922.3

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 付宗平;;集體經(jīng)營(yíng)性建設(shè)用地入市存在的問(wèn)題及對(duì)策——基于成都市的實(shí)證分析[J];農(nóng)村經(jīng)濟(jì);2016年09期

2 鄭麗霞;;農(nóng)村集體經(jīng)營(yíng)性建設(shè)用地“入市”流轉(zhuǎn)的法律問(wèn)題研究[J];農(nóng)業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì);2016年09期

3 何虹;陸成林;;集體經(jīng)營(yíng)性建設(shè)用地入市制度障礙及突破[J];中國(guó)土地;2016年07期

4 何格;別夢(mèng)瑤;陳文寬;;集體經(jīng)營(yíng)性建設(shè)用地入市存在問(wèn)題及其對(duì)策——以成都市為例[J];中州學(xué)刊;2016年02期

5 郭玲霞;;對(duì)放開農(nóng)村集體建設(shè)用地流轉(zhuǎn)的若干思考[J];天津農(nóng)業(yè)科學(xué);2016年02期

6 吳萍;;農(nóng)村集體經(jīng)營(yíng)性建設(shè)用地“同等入市”的困境與出路[J];廣西社會(huì)科學(xué);2016年01期

7 溫世揚(yáng);;集體經(jīng)營(yíng)性建設(shè)用地“同等入市”的法制革新[J];中國(guó)法學(xué);2015年04期

8 房紹坤;;農(nóng)村集體經(jīng)營(yíng)性建設(shè)用地入市的幾個(gè)法律問(wèn)題[J];煙臺(tái)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2015年03期

9 陸劍;;集體經(jīng)營(yíng)性建設(shè)用地入市的實(shí)證解析與立法回應(yīng)[J];法商研究;2015年03期

10 汪東;蔡屏;;集體經(jīng)營(yíng)性建設(shè)用地入市法律問(wèn)題研究[J];中國(guó)房地產(chǎn);2015年07期

，

本文編號(hào)：1519478