本文關(guān)鍵詞：地理學(xué)發(fā)展的戰(zhàn)略方向探討，由筆耕文化傳播整理發(fā)布。

地理學(xué)發(fā)展的戰(zhàn)略方向探討

The strategic directions for geography

[1] [2] [3] [4] [5]

SUN Jun, PAN Yujun, TANG Maolin, WU Youde, ZHAO Jianxia （1. College of Tourism and Geographical Sciences, Yunnan Normal University, Kunming 650500, China 2. College of Soci

[1]云南師范大學(xué)旅游與地理科學(xué)學(xué)院,昆明650500; [2]云南師范大學(xué)社會發(fā)展學(xué)院,昆明650500; [3]南京師范大學(xué)地理科學(xué)學(xué)院,南京210023

文章摘要：《了解正在變化的星球：地理科學(xué)的戰(zhàn)略方向》是美國國家研究理事會最新的一部頗富創(chuàng)建性和前瞻性的研究報告,反映了地理學(xué)發(fā)展的集成研究戰(zhàn)略方向。盡管受其任務(wù)和受眾的影響,報告話語表現(xiàn)出過度重視技術(shù)和工具,但其提出的建設(shè)地理科學(xué)這一議題切中了當前地理學(xué)發(fā)展的戰(zhàn)略方向,也在技術(shù)和工具這個＂任務(wù)＂方面嘗試相應(yīng)的建構(gòu)工作,相伴的重要工作是給出了地理科學(xué)未來10年的11個優(yōu)先研究領(lǐng)域。報告后來的評論則重新發(fā)掘并彌補了該報告的某些不足,說明了該報告＂深度＂的一面,尤其是地理科學(xué)的方法論問題。與該報告及其評論相比,中國建設(shè)地理科學(xué)的主張具有如下特點：①學(xué)科體系龐大、層次分明、范疇嚴密;②＂學(xué)科＂與＂任務(wù)＂明顯平衡;③有系統(tǒng)論和整體論的方法論;④初步顯現(xiàn)深遠的、連鎖的影響�！读私庹谧兓男乔颉芳捌湓u論,以及中國地理科學(xué)建設(shè)表明——跨學(xué)科的地理科學(xué)是地理學(xué)發(fā)展的戰(zhàn)略方向：①地理學(xué)正走向或走入集成研究的＂大科學(xué)＂階段;②＂學(xué)科＂與＂任務(wù)＂平衡是地理學(xué)自身發(fā)展及應(yīng)對了解正在變化的星球的必然要求;③未來地理科學(xué)建設(shè)應(yīng)當是具有科學(xué)人文主義的學(xué)科體系、方法論、技術(shù)和工具的＂三元＂結(jié)構(gòu)。

Abstr：Understanding the Changing Planet： Strategic Directions for the Geographical Sciences （UCP）, prepared by the U.S. National Research Council＇s （NRC） ad hoc Committee on the strategic directions for geographical sciences in the next decade, is an original and agenda-setting document that speaks to transdisciplinary Geographical Sciences in order to get a better understanding of our rapidly changing planet. But for NRC＇s decision to devote some of the ＇precious space＇ in the report to relatively uncontroversial matters, and UCP was written for the audience which includes people who have little sense of what a geographical ＇take＇ on issues and problems means, as a result the role of technologies and tools is likely to be dominant. The most important contribution of UCP lies in the point of progress of geography in modern times, putting forward the question of Geographical Sciences, and successfully constructing it with the aid of technologies and tools. Another contribution of UCP is the proposed eleven strategic directions for the emerging transdisciplinary field of Geographical Sciences in the next decade. Just a few months later, The Professional Geographer, in a Focus Section, invites five geographers to evaluate UCP briefly, followed by a response from Alexander Murphy on behalf of the NRC Committee, and this focus section initiates a new conversation among geographers about the future of geography. These comments about UCP rediscover and make up the defects of UCP, especially much attention is paid to the methodology of Geographical Sciences. This paper discusses the progress of Geographical Sciences in Chinese Mainland. It illustrates that Chinese Geographical Sciences： （1） are a more complex disciplinary

文章關(guān)鍵詞：

Keyword：:UCP comments geography geographical sciences primary fields strategicdirections ‘Discipline＇ and‘ Task＇

課題項目：國家自然科學(xué)基金項目（40761001;41071105;41261033）;國家哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)基金項目（BHAl00058）;科技部創(chuàng)新方法工作項目 （2007FY140800） [Foundation： National Natural Science Foundation of China, No.40761001; No.41071105; No.41261033; National Philosophy Social Science of China, No.BHA100058; Innovation Method Fund of China, No.2007FY140800]

  本文關(guān)鍵詞：地理學(xué)發(fā)展的戰(zhàn)略方向探討，由筆耕文化傳播整理發(fā)布。