本文關(guān)鍵詞：行動者網(wǎng)絡(luò)理論在人文地理領(lǐng)域應(yīng)用研究述評，由筆耕文化傳播整理發(fā)布。

全文: (947 KB)  
輸出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      

摘要 行動者網(wǎng)絡(luò)理論以一種結(jié)構(gòu)化的方式來構(gòu)建行為主體之間的關(guān)系, 并將要素流動和網(wǎng)絡(luò)化互動形態(tài)納入分析范疇, 為各學(xué)科研究提供了全新的視角, 在人文地理領(lǐng)域的應(yīng)用也日漸增多。本文在總結(jié)行動者網(wǎng)絡(luò)理論主要內(nèi)容的基礎(chǔ)上, 分類歸納評述了行動者網(wǎng)絡(luò)理論在不同分支研究領(lǐng)域的應(yīng)用主題和方式, 并就研究的深度、廣度、影響力進(jìn)行國內(nèi)外對比。研究表明, 行動者網(wǎng)絡(luò)理論對人與非人行動者的一致看待及其通過轉(zhuǎn)譯過程解析網(wǎng)絡(luò)關(guān)系的研究模式, 除強化了經(jīng)濟地理等領(lǐng)域的理論建構(gòu)之外, 也為鄉(xiāng)村地理、城市地理、經(jīng)濟地理、旅游地理等領(lǐng)域的地方發(fā)展、政策實踐研究提供了一種有效的分析方法。引入該理論的人文地理研究引用頻次高, 有較大的學(xué)術(shù)影響。目前國內(nèi)研究多停留在行動者網(wǎng)絡(luò)理論分析框架的直接套用, 極少涉及分析框架改進(jìn)和理論思考, 在廣度和深度上與國際研究仍有差距。

服務(wù)

E-mail Alert

RSS

收稿日期: 2012-11-01      出版日期: 2013-07-31

基金資助:國家自然科學(xué)基金項目(40901084);國家自然科學(xué)基金重點項目(41130747);中山大學(xué)青年教師培育項目(11lgpy62)。

作者簡介: 劉宣(1980-),女,博士,副教授,主要從事土地利用與規(guī)劃及城市地理研究。E-mail:liuxuan3@mail.sysu.edu.cn

引用本文:   

劉宣, 王小依. 行動者網(wǎng)絡(luò)理論在人文地理領(lǐng)域應(yīng)用研究述評[J]. 地理科學(xué)進(jìn)展, 2013, 32(7): 1139-1147.
LIU Xuan, WANG Xiaoyi. A review on the application of actor network theory to human geography. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2013, 32(7): 1139-1147.

鏈接本文:  

     或     

[1]Adrian S. 2003. Power relations, industrial clusters, and regional transformations: Pan-european integration and outward processing in the Slovak Clothing Industry. Economic Geography, 79(1): 17-40．

[2]Ai S W, Miao C H. 2009. Philosophically thinking of economic geogrephy: An actor-network-theory respective. Economic Geography, 29(4): 545-550. [艾少偉, 苗長虹. 2009. 行動者網(wǎng)絡(luò)理論視域下的經(jīng)濟地理學(xué)哲學(xué)思考. 經(jīng)濟地理, 29(4): 545-550.]

[3]Ai S W, Miao C H. 2010. "Space of places", "space of flows" and "space of actor-network": From the perspective of ANT．Human Geography, 25(2): 43-49. [艾少偉, 苗長 虹. 2010. 從“地方空間”、“流動空間”到“行動者網(wǎng)絡(luò)空 間”: ANT視角. 人文地理, 25(2): 43-49.]

[4]Ai S W, Miao C H. 2011. Heterogeneous "channels" and localized networking of transnational corporations: Case of Suzhou Industrial Park. Geographical Research, 30(8): 1483-149. [艾少偉, 苗長虹. 2011. 異質(zhì)性“通道”與跨國 公司地方化結(jié)網(wǎng): 以蘇州工業(yè)園為例. 地理研究, 30(8): 1483-1498.]

[5]Arnaboldi M, Spiller N. 2011. Actor-network theory and stakeholder collaboration: The case of cultural districts. Tourism Management, 32(3): 641-654.

[6]Bathelt H, Gluckler J. 2003. Toward a relational economic geography. Journal of Economic Geography, 3(3): 117-144.

[7]Busch L, Juska A. 1997. Beyond political economy: Actor net-works and the globalization of agriculture. Review of International Political Economy, 4(4): 688-708.

[8]Callon M. 1986. The sociology of an actor-network: The case of the electric vehicle//Callon M, Law J, Rip A. Mapping the dynamics of science and technology. London: Macmillan Press: 19-34.

[9]Coe N M, Hess M, Yeung H W C, et al. 2004. "Globalizing" regional development: A global production networks perspective. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 29(4): 468-484.

[10]Comber A, Fisher P, Wadsworth R. 2003. Actor-network theory: A suitable framework to understand how land cover mapping projects develop？ Land Use Policy, 20(4): 299-309.

[11]Cumbers A, Mackinnon D, McMaster R. 2003. Institutions, power and space: Assessing the limits to institutionalism in economic geography. European urban and regional studies, 10(4): 325-342.

[12]Denkin N K, Lincoln Y S. 2000. Handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Qaks, CA: Sage.

[13]Dicken P, Kelly P F, Olds K, et al. 2001. Chains and networks, territories and scales: Towards a relational framework for analysing the global economy. Global Networks, 1(2): 89-112.

[14]Farías I, Bender T. 2010. Urban assemblages: How actor-network theory changes urban studies. New York: Routledge.

[15]Feng J, Wu F F. The application of qualitative research method in urban socio-spatial structure research. Geographical Research, 30(11): 1956-1967. [馮健, 吳芳芳. 2011. 質(zhì)性 方法在城市社會空間研究中的應(yīng)用. 地理研究, 30(11): 1956-1967.]

[16]Friedman J. 1986. The world city hypothesis. Development and Change, 17(1): 69-83.

[17]Fu C G. 2011. Research on the independent innovation of cotton clothing industry cluster in Yulin: Based on actor-network- theory. China-Asean Exposition, (1): 12-15. [付朝 干. 2011. 玉林市福綿服裝產(chǎn)業(yè)集群自主創(chuàng)新能力研 究: 基于行動者網(wǎng)絡(luò)理論. 中國— 東盟博覽, (1): 12-15.]

[18]Goodman D. 1999. Agro-food studies in the "Age of Ecology": Nature, corporeality, bio-politics. Sociologia Ruralis, 39 (1): 17-38.

[19]Graham S. 1998. The end of geography or the explosion of place? Conceptualizing space, place and information technology. Progress in Human Geography, 22(2): 165-185.

[20]He S Z. 2010. Study on the role of main actor in creative community network[D]. Taipei: National Taipei University. [何慎筑. 2010. 創(chuàng)意社區(qū)網(wǎng)絡(luò)中主要行動者角色之研究 [D]. 臺北: 國立臺北大學(xué).]

[21]Hendenrsen J, Dicken P, Hess M, et al. 2002. Global production networks and the analysis of economic development. Review of International Political Economy, 9(3): 436-464.

[22]Harvey F, Chrisman N. 1998. Boundary objects and the social construction of GIS technology. Environment and Planning A, 30(9): 1683-1694.

[23]Hitchings R. 2003. People, plants and performance: On actor network theory and the material pleasures of the private garden. Social & Cultural Geography, 4(1): 99-113.

[24]Hommels A. 2005. Unbuilding cities: Obduracy in urban socio- technical change. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

[25]Hughes A. 2000. Retailers, knowledges and changing commodity networks: The case of the cut flower trade. Geoforum, 31(2): 175-190.

[26]Jones A. 2008. Beyond embeddedness: Economic practices and the invisible dimensions of transnational business activity. Progress in Human Geography, 32(1): 71-88.

[27]Jones A, Murphy J T. 2010. Theorizing practice in economic geography: Foundations, challenges, and possibilities. Progress in Human Geography, 35(3): 366-392.

[28]Kim S J. 2006. Networks, Scale, and transnational corporations: The case of the South Korean seed industry. Economic Geography, 82(3): 317-339.

[29]Latour B. 1987. Science in action: How to follow engineers and scientists through society. Milton Keynes, UK: Open University Press.

[30]Law J. 1992. Notes on the theory of the actor network: Ordering, strategy and heterogeneity. System Practice, 5(4): 379-393.

[31]Li C J. 2005. A study on the application of actor network theory to rural development: A case study on the development of Chiu-Fen settlement from 1895 to 1945. Journal of Geographical Science, 39: 1-30. [李承嘉. 2005. 行動者 網(wǎng)絡(luò)理論應(yīng)用于鄉(xiāng)村發(fā)展之研究: 以九份聚落 1895-1945 年發(fā)展為例. 臺灣地理學(xué)報, 39: 1-30.]

[32]Li X J, Luo Q. 2007. A review on relational turn in economic geography. World Regional Studies, 16(4): 19-27. [李小 建, 羅慶. 2007. 經(jīng)濟地理學(xué)的關(guān)系轉(zhuǎn)向評述. 世界地理 研究, 16(4): 19-27.]

[33]Lin G, Shen J P. 2011. The consumption of body-building and the construction of place in a metropolis. Acta Geographica Sinica, 66(10): 1321-1331. [林耿, 沈建萍. 2011. 大城 市健身消費與地方建構(gòu). 地理學(xué)報, 66(10): 1321-1331.]

[34]Long N. 2001. Development sociology: Actor perspective. London: Routledge.

[35]Lowe P, Murdoch J, Ward N. 1995. Networks in rural development: Beyond exogenous and endogenous models//Van der Ploeg J D, Van Dijk G. Beyond modernization: The impact of endogenous rural development. Assen, Netherlands: Van Gorcum: 18-105.

[36]Markusen A. 1999. Fuzzy concepts, scanty evidence and policy distance: The case for rigour and policy relevance in critical regional studies. Regional Studies, 33(9): 869-886.

[37]Martin E. 2000. Actor-networks and implementation: Examples from conservation GIS in Ecuador. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 14(8): 715-737.

[38]Massey D B. 1999. Space-Time, "Science" and the relationship between physical geography and human geography. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 24(3): 261-276.

[39]Massey D B, Allen J, Sarre P. 1999. Human geography today. Cambridge: Polity Press.

[40]Ma H T, Miao C H, Gao J B. 2009. To build learning network of industry cluster: An actor network theory pespective. Economic Geography, 29(8): 1327-1331. [馬海濤, 苗長 虹, 高軍波. 2009. 行動者網(wǎng)絡(luò)理論視角下的產(chǎn)業(yè)集群 學(xué)習(xí)網(wǎng)絡(luò)構(gòu)建. 經(jīng)濟地理, 29(8): 1327-1331.]

[41]Ma X G, Li G C. 2012. Research methods for world city network and relevant inspirations. Progress in Geogprahy, 31 (2): 255-263. [馬學(xué)廣, 李貴才. 2012. 世界城市網(wǎng)絡(luò)研究 方法論. 地理科學(xué)進(jìn)展, 31(2): 255-263.]

[42]Miao C H, Wei Y H. 2007. Development and debates in the theoretical construction of economic geography. Geographical Research, 26(6): 1233-1246. [苗長虹, 魏也華. 2007. 西方經(jīng)濟地理學(xué)理論建構(gòu)的發(fā)展與論爭. 地理研 究, 26(6): 1233-1246.]

[43]Murdoch J, Marsden T. 1995. The spatialization of politics: Local and national actor-spaces in environmental conflict. Transaction of the Institute of British Geographers, 20(3): 368-380.

[44]Murdoch J. 1997. Inhuman, nonhuman, human: Actor-network theory and the proospects for a non dualistic and symmetrical perspective on nature and society. Environment and Planning D, 15(6): 731-756.

[45]Murdoch J. 1998. The spaces of actor-network theory. Geoforum, 29(4): 357-374.

[46]Murdoch J. 2000. Networks: A new paradigm of rural development？ Journal of Rural Studies, 16(4): 407-419.

[47]Murphy J T. 2006. Building trust in economic space. Progress in Human Geography, 30(4): 427-450.

[48]Povilanskas R, Armaitiene A. 2011. Seaside resort-hinterland nexus: Palanga, lithuania. Annals of Tourism Research, 38 (3): 1156-1177.

[49]Paget E, Dimanche F, Mounet J. 2010. A tourism innovation case: An actor-network approach. Annals of Tourism Research, 37(3): 828-847.

[50]Reed M I. 1997. In praise of duality and dualism: Rethinking agency and structure in organisational analysis. Organisation Studies, 18(1): 21-42.

[51]Ren C. 2011. Non-human Agency, radical ontology and tourism realities. Annals of Tourism Research, 38(3): 858-881.

[52]Rodger K, Moore S, Newsome D. 2009. Wildlife tourism, science and actor network theory. Annals of Tourism Research, 36(4): 645-666.

[53]Rodríguez-Giralt I. 2011. Social movements as actor-networks: Prospects for a symmetrical approach to Doñana's environmentalist protests. Convergencia, Revista de Ciencias Sociales, 18: 13-35.

[54]Rodríguez-Pose A. 2001. Killing economic geography with a "cultural turn" overdose. Antipode, 33(2): 176-182.

[55]Shi S, Ning Y M. 2005. Evolution on connotation of space in human geography. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 25(3): 340-345. [石崧, 寧越敏. 2005. 人文地理學(xué)“空間”內(nèi)涵 的演進(jìn). 地理科學(xué), 25(3): 340-345.]

[56]Smith R G. 2003. World city actor-networks. Progress in Human Geography, 27(1): 25-44.

[57]Storper M. 1997. The regional world: Territorial development in a global economy. New York: Guilford Press.

[58]Taylor P J. 2001. Specification of the world city network. Geographical Analysis, 33(2): 181-194.

[59]Taylor P J, Walker D R F. 2001. World cities: A first multivariate analysis of their service complexes. Urban Studies, 38 (1): 23-47.

[60]Trauger A. 2009. Social agency and networked spatial relations in sustainable agriculture. Area, 41(2): 117-128.

[61]Thrift N. 1996. Spatial formation. London: Sage.

[62]Tribe J. 2010. Tribes territories and network in the tourism academy. Annals of Tourism Research, 37(1): 7-33.

[63]Valkonen J. 2010. Acting in nature: Service events and agency in wildernes guiding. Tourist Studies, 9(2): 164-180.

[64]Van der Duim R. 2007. Tourismscapes: An actor-network perspective. Annals of Tourism Research, 34(4): 961-976.

[65]Wang A M, Ma X G, Yan X P. 2010. Land use conflicts and their governance mechanics on actors network theory. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 30(1): 80-85. [王愛民, 馬學(xué)廣, 閆小培. 2010. 基于行動者網(wǎng)絡(luò)的土地利用沖突及 其治理機制研究: 以廣州市海珠區(qū)果林保護區(qū)為例. 地 理科學(xué), 30(1): 80-85.]

[66]Wen J, Jiang Y M. 2010. Qualitative research method. Beijing, China: Peking University Press. [文軍, 蔣逸民. 2010. 質(zhì) 性研究概論. 北京: 北京大學(xué)出版社.]

[67]Yeung H W C. 2003a. Practicing new economic geographies: A methodological examination. Annual of the Association of American Geographers, 92(2): 442-462.

[68]Yeung H W C. 2003b. Theorizing economic geographies of Asia. Economic Geography, 79(2): 107-128.

[69]Yeung H W C. 2005. Rethinking relational economic geography. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 30(1): 37-51.

[70]Zhang H Z, Zhou Y G, Wei H Y, et al. 2008. An empirical study of rural tourism endogenous development based on actor-network theory. Tourism Tribune, 23(2): 65-71. [張 環(huán)宙, 周永廣, 魏蕙雅, 等. 2008. 基于行動者網(wǎng)絡(luò)理論 的鄉(xiāng)村旅游內(nèi)生式發(fā)展的實證研究. 旅游學(xué)刊, 23(2): 65-71.]

[71]Zhao Q. 2011. Mechanism of urban governance: An actor-network perspective. Administrative Tribune, 18(1): 74-77. [趙強. 2011. 城市治理動力機制: 行動者網(wǎng)絡(luò)理論視角. 行政論壇, 18(1): 74-77.]

[72]Zheng L J. 2009. Border tourism innovation: From actor-network perspective. World Regional Studies, 18(2): 128-134. [鄭遼吉. 2009. 丹東邊境旅游產(chǎn)品創(chuàng)新與聯(lián)合 開發(fā): 基于行動者網(wǎng)絡(luò)理論觀點. 世界地理研究, 18(2): 128-134.]

[73]Zhu F, Bao J G, Xiang Y X. 2012. Actor-network-theory(ANT) and paradigm innovation for tourism research. Tourism Tribune, 27(11): 24-31. [朱峰, 保繼剛, 項怡嫻. 2012. 行 動者網(wǎng)絡(luò)理論(ANT)于旅游研究范式創(chuàng)新. 旅游學(xué)刊, 27(11): 24-31.]

[1] 姜超, 唐煥麗, 柳林. 中國犯罪地理研究述評[J]. 地理科學(xué)進(jìn)展, 2014, 33(4): 561-573.

[2] 文嫮, 桂亞娜. 嵌入性視角下創(chuàng)意產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展研究述評[J]. 地理科學(xué)進(jìn)展, 2014, 33(3): 389-398.

[3] 文謹(jǐn), 白凱, 孫星. 地理學(xué)視角下的出國旅居研究綜述[J]. 地理科學(xué)進(jìn)展, 2013, 32(7): 1148-1158.

[4] 吳威, 曹有揮, 梁雙波. 運輸效率研究述評及基于交通運輸?shù)乩韺W(xué)視角的研究展望[J]. 地理科學(xué)進(jìn)展, 2013, 32(2): 243-250.

[5] 中國地理學(xué)會青年工作委員. 第十四屆全國青年地理工作者學(xué)術(shù)研討會青年學(xué)術(shù)辯論賽決賽實錄[J]. 地理科學(xué)進(jìn)展, 2013, 32(12): 1742-1750.

[6] 王錚, 翟石艷. 計算機實驗人文地理學(xué)的理論構(gòu)建及應(yīng)用——以城市居住區(qū)位選擇為例[J]. 地理科學(xué)進(jìn)展, 2013, 32(10): 1444-1453.

[7] 周婧, 楊慶媛. 農(nóng)戶層面農(nóng)村宅基地流轉(zhuǎn)研究進(jìn)展與述評[J]. 地理科學(xué)進(jìn)展, 2012, 31(2): 139-148.

[8] 王守春. 中國歷史地理學(xué)的回顧與展望——建所70周年歷史地理學(xué)研究成果與發(fā)展前景[J]. 地理科學(xué)進(jìn)展, 2011, 30(4): 442-451.

[9] 吳松弟, 侯甬堅. 中國歷史人文地理學(xué)研究進(jìn)展與展望[J]. 地理科學(xué)進(jìn)展, 2011, 30(12): 1513-1518.

[10] 方創(chuàng)琳, 周尚意, 柴彥威, 陸玉麒, 朱竑, 馮健, 劉云剛. 中國人文地理學(xué)研究進(jìn)展與展望[J]. 地理科學(xué)進(jìn)展, 2011, 30(12): 1470-1478.

[11] 劉麗梅,呂君. 中國社區(qū)參與旅游發(fā)展研究述評[J]. 地理科學(xué)進(jìn)展, 2010, 29(8): 1018-1024.

[12] 王海文. 服務(wù)業(yè)地理空間研究進(jìn)展與文獻(xiàn)述評[J]. 地理科學(xué)進(jìn)展, 2010, 29(2): 199-207.

[13] 陳彥光. 對稱性與人文地理系統(tǒng)的規(guī)律性[J]. 地理科學(xué)進(jìn)展, 2009, 28(2): 312-320.

[14] 卜崇峰,蔡強國,張興昌,馬力. 土壤結(jié)皮的發(fā)育特征及其生態(tài)功能研究述評[J]. 地理科學(xué)進(jìn)展, 2008, 27(2): 26-31.

[15] 樊杰, 許豫東, 邵陽 . 土地利用變化研究的人文地理視角與新命題[J]. 地理科學(xué)進(jìn)展, 2003, 22(1): 1-10.

  本文關(guān)鍵詞：行動者網(wǎng)絡(luò)理論在人文地理領(lǐng)域應(yīng)用研究述評，，由筆耕文化傳播整理發(fā)布。