本文選題：評論 + 顧炎武��； 參考：《中國歷史地理論叢》2013年04期

【摘要】：作者提出研究清代地理考據(jù)的理念,是應(yīng)深入到清儒熟稔的學術(shù)領(lǐng)域中去,一一檢驗其考證之是或非,從而得出實實在在的結(jié)論。本文以《日知錄》為主,探討了顧炎武在政區(qū)沿革、地名用字、地名讀音、異地同名、地理方位、地名定位、地理辨誤等方面的學術(shù)貢獻,認為他在沿革地理領(lǐng)域的獨立見解頗具學術(shù)價值,而顧炎武指出十處《明一統(tǒng)志》之誤在客觀上開啟了批評《明一統(tǒng)志》之風。同時,作者也考辨了顧炎武兩類失誤,一是唐代領(lǐng)縣過十之州,顧炎武認為只有八個,卻遺漏了六個;顧炎武關(guān)于府制的議論,居然發(fā)生四處錯誤,從而認為評價顧炎武既不可過于苛求,但也不可拔高。
[Abstract]:The author puts forward the idea of studying geographical textual research in the Qing Dynasty, which is to go deep into the academic field which is familiar with the Qing Confucianism, to examine whether the textual research is true or not, and to draw a real conclusion. This paper discusses the academic contributions of Gu Yanwu in the evolution of administrative district, the use of characters for place names, the pronunciation of place names, the name of the same name, the geographical location, the location of geographical names, the identification of geographical errors, and so on. He thinks that his independent opinion in the field of evolution geography is of academic value, while Gu Yanwu points out that the mistakes of ten "Ming and one Zhi" have objectively opened up the trend of criticism. At the same time, the author has also examined and identified two kinds of mistakes made by Gu Yanwu. First, Gu Yanwu thought that there were only eight states and missed six of the ten counties in the Tang Dynasty. Gu Yanwu's argument about the government system actually made four mistakes. So that the evaluation of Gu Yanwu can not be too demanding, but also can not be exalted.
【作者單位】： 中國人民大學清史研究所;
【基金】：國家社科基金重大項目《清史地圖集》(批準號:12&ZD146,主持人:華林甫)階段性成果之一
【分類號】：K928.6

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前7條

1 陳智超;;陳垣與史源學及《日知錄》研究——《日知錄校注》編者前言[J];安徽大學學報(哲學社會科學版);2007年03期

2 吳長庚;;清代經(jīng)典考據(jù)學之祖——顧炎武[J];湖南大學學報(社會科學版);2007年02期

3 趙e，

本文編號：1825365