本文選題：生育價值觀 + 城市大學生　； 參考：《上海外國語大學》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：隨著我國近幾年生育政策的調(diào)整,特別是2016年全面放開二胎政策的出臺,生育觀研究的重要性日益凸顯。國內(nèi)外研究大多從社會學和人口學角度出發(fā),一般針對某一個社會群體,從跨文化角度對兩個社會群體的生育觀進行比較研究較為少見。本文以張進輔等人提出的生育價值觀的理論構(gòu)建以及Triandis的亞文化理論為研究框架,對城市出生和成長的九零后大學生和農(nóng)村出生和成長的九零后農(nóng)民工進行深度訪談,找出兩者生育觀取向的異同,以及這些異同背后兩種亞文化之間相互作用的機理。本文采用半結(jié)構(gòu)訪談法,從24位受訪者獲得數(shù)據(jù)加以分析。訪談提綱是在借鑒張進輔等人提出的生育價值觀結(jié)構(gòu)圖的基礎(chǔ)上獲得的。研究結(jié)果表明,九零后城市大學生和九零后鄉(xiāng)村農(nóng)民工的生育價值觀在生育時間,性別偏好,生育條件,生育價值,對待性教育的態(tài)度,對待收養(yǎng)的態(tài)度等六個方面存在差異,而在生育愿望,生育數(shù)量,生育責任和生育方式等四個方面存在共性。在生育時間上,九零后城市大學生普遍晚于九零后農(nóng)民工;在性別偏好上,有重男輕女思想的九零后農(nóng)民工要明顯多于九零后城市大學生;在生育條件上,九零后城市大學生強調(diào)在生小孩之前要做好在經(jīng)濟上身體上心理上等各方面的準備,而九零后農(nóng)民工覺得在生小孩之前不需要做太多準備;在生育價值上,大部分九零后城市大學生覺得生小孩是為了體驗不同的人生階段,而大部分九零后農(nóng)民工覺得生小孩是為了傳宗接代,對長輩表示孝順;在性教育態(tài)度上,大部分九零后城市大學生覺得性教育對孩子的健康成長非常必要,而九零后農(nóng)民工覺得性教育是父母和孩子之間一個非常尷尬的話題;在收養(yǎng)小孩的態(tài)度上,大部分九零后城市大學生可以接受收養(yǎng)小孩,而九零后農(nóng)民工普遍更看重血緣關(guān)系,不能接受收養(yǎng)。從Triandis的亞文化理論出發(fā),作者從城市文化和農(nóng)村文化的角度剖析了這兩個社會群體生育觀存在異同的原因�；诔鞘泻娃r(nóng)村之間的流動性,本文指出了這兩種亞文化之間的跨文化的互交動力,如鄉(xiāng)村農(nóng)民工也會受到城市文化的影響。
[Abstract]:With the adjustment of fertility policy in China in recent years, especially the release of the policy of fully liberalizing the second child in 2016, the importance of the research on fertility concept has become increasingly prominent. Most of the studies at home and abroad are based on sociology and demography. Generally speaking, it is rare to compare the fertility views of two social groups from the perspective of cross-culture and a certain social group. Based on the theoretical construction of fertility values put forward by Zhang Jinfu and Triandis's sub-culture theory, this paper conducts in-depth interviews with post-90s college students born and growing up in urban areas and migrant workers born and raised in rural areas. Find out the similarities and differences of the orientation of the two fertility views and the mechanism of interaction between the two subcultures behind these similarities and differences. The data obtained from 24 interviewees were analyzed by semi-structured interviews. The outline of the interview was obtained on the basis of the structure chart of fertility values proposed by Zhang Jinfu and others. The results show that the fertility values of urban college students and rural migrant workers after 1990 are different in six aspects, such as reproductive time, gender preference, fertility condition, fertility value, attitude towards sex education, attitude towards adoption, etc. But in the fertility desire, the fertility quantity, the fertility responsibility and the fertility way and so on four aspects has the commonness. In terms of childbearing time, urban college students are generally later than post-90 migrant workers in terms of their sex preference. In terms of gender preference, the number of post-90s migrant workers who have a preference for boys over women is obviously higher than that of post-1990 urban college students. In terms of fertility conditions, After 90, urban college students stressed that they should be prepared financially, physically, and psychologically before giving birth, while after 90, migrant workers felt that they did not need to do much preparation before giving birth; in terms of fertility value, Most post-1990 urban college students feel that the purpose of having children is to experience different stages of life, while most of the post-90s migrant workers feel that they are having children in order to be filial and filial to their elders. In terms of their attitude towards sex education, Most post-1990 urban college students feel that sex education is very necessary for the healthy growth of their children, while the post-90s migrant workers feel that sex education is a very awkward topic between parents and children; in terms of the attitude towards the adoption of children, Most post-1990 urban college students can accept the adoption of children, but the post-90s migrant workers generally attach more importance to consanguinity and cannot accept adoption. Based on Triandis's theory of subculture, the author analyzes the reasons for the similarities and differences between the two social groups' conception of fertility from the point of view of urban culture and rural culture. Based on the mobility between urban and rural areas, this paper points out the cross-cultural interaction between the two subcultures, such as rural migrant workers will also be affected by urban culture.
【學位授予單位】：上海外國語大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：C924.21

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 王志強;;我國性教育現(xiàn)狀的歷史原因分析[J];學理論;2011年24期

2 ;The Exploration to the Historical Origin of Differences between Urban and Rural Areas in China[J];Asian Agricultural Research;2011年01期

3 姜永志;張海鐘;;文化心理學視域下的城鄉(xiāng)文化心理差異分析[J];社會心理科學;2009年05期

4 董蘭蘭;焦樹國;;當代研究生生育觀調(diào)查——以南開大學為例[J];南京人口管理干部學院學報;2007年04期

5 張進輔,童琦,畢重增;生育價值觀的理論構(gòu)建及問卷的初步編制[J];心理學報;2005年05期

6 韓永江;生育觀影響因素的經(jīng)濟分析[J];人口學刊;2005年02期

7 趙文琛;論生育文化[J];人口研究;2001年06期

8 郭泮溪;孝與我國人口文化傳統(tǒng)生育觀[J];人口學刊;1999年03期

9 涂文學;對立與共生:中國近代城市文化的二元結(jié)構(gòu)[J];天津社會科學;1998年01期

10 ;論傳統(tǒng)的生育文化[J];中國文化研究;1996年02期

相關(guān)碩士學位論文 前4條

1 冀玉琪;當代青年農(nóng)民生育觀研究[D];山西農(nóng)業(yè)大學;2015年

2 卞雪華;影響農(nóng)村婦女生育觀變遷的因素研究[D];黑龍江大學;2013年

3 潘丹;貴州在校大學生生育觀的研究[D];貴州大學;2008年

4 吳蘭;從神話傳說探討克木人的傳統(tǒng)生育觀[D];中央民族大學;2004年

，

本文編號：1944854