【摘要】：正以治史為長(zhǎng)的徐復(fù)觀,政論寫(xiě)作時(shí)明顯多了一些歷史的穿透力和厚重感。前不久,我所任職的鳳凰網(wǎng)評(píng)論部組織策劃了"有聲之年——2015年度影響中國(guó)十大評(píng)論評(píng)選"。為什么要做十大評(píng)論評(píng)選?我們的期待有三:勾勒一張?jiān)u論人眼中的中國(guó)問(wèn)題之新聞地圖,打撈那些漸行漸遠(yuǎn)漸無(wú)影的評(píng)論記憶,樹(shù)立一個(gè)好評(píng)論標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的參照體系。關(guān)于好評(píng)論的標(biāo)準(zhǔn),在"鳳凰縱議院"訪談節(jié)目《好評(píng)論的標(biāo)準(zhǔn)是什么》中,我說(shuō)好評(píng)論至少有四個(gè)標(biāo)準(zhǔn),分別是選題價(jià)值、判斷立場(chǎng)、人性標(biāo)尺和預(yù)見(jiàn)性。按這個(gè)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)來(lái)衡量,徐復(fù)觀的評(píng)論,
[Abstract]:Xu Fuguan, who is based on the history of governance, obviously has some historical penetration and heavy feelings in the writing of political theory. Not long ago, Phoenix New Media, who I worked for, organized and planned the "year of Sound-the Top Ten Review selection of influence on China in 2015." Why do you want to make the top ten reviews? There are three expectations: to outline a news map of China's problems in the eyes of commentators, to salvage memories of comments that are fading away, and to set up a good reference system for comment standards.? With regard to the criteria for good comments, in the Phoenix Longitudinal House talk program "what are the criteria for good comments," I said that there are at least four criteria for good comments, namely, the value of the topic, the judgment position, the measure of human nature and foresight. By this standard, Xu Fuguan's comments,
【作者單位】： 鳳凰網(wǎng);
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：G206
，

本文編號(hào)：2517434