【摘要】：正以治史為長的徐復觀,政論寫作時明顯多了一些歷史的穿透力和厚重感。前不久,我所任職的鳳凰網(wǎng)評論部組織策劃了"有聲之年——2015年度影響中國十大評論評選"。為什么要做十大評論評選?我們的期待有三:勾勒一張評論人眼中的中國問題之新聞地圖,打撈那些漸行漸遠漸無影的評論記憶,樹立一個好評論標準的參照體系。關于好評論的標準,在"鳳凰縱議院"訪談節(jié)目《好評論的標準是什么》中,我說好評論至少有四個標準,分別是選題價值、判斷立場、人性標尺和預見性。按這個標準來衡量,徐復觀的評論,
[Abstract]:Xu Fuguan, who is based on the history of governance, obviously has some historical penetration and heavy feelings in the writing of political theory. Not long ago, Phoenix New Media, who I worked for, organized and planned the "year of Sound-the Top Ten Review selection of influence on China in 2015." Why do you want to make the top ten reviews? There are three expectations: to outline a news map of China's problems in the eyes of commentators, to salvage memories of comments that are fading away, and to set up a good reference system for comment standards.? With regard to the criteria for good comments, in the Phoenix Longitudinal House talk program "what are the criteria for good comments," I said that there are at least four criteria for good comments, namely, the value of the topic, the judgment position, the measure of human nature and foresight. By this standard, Xu Fuguan's comments,
【作者單位】： 鳳凰網(wǎng);
【分類號】：G206
，

本文編號：2517434