【摘要】： 法治不僅是對(duì)社會(huì)治理機(jī)制、社會(huì)活動(dòng)方式和社會(huì)秩序狀態(tài)這樣宏觀層面上的要求,更需要行政執(zhí)法這樣微觀領(lǐng)域具體制度的支持,行政程序證據(jù)制度一定程度是從微觀層面對(duì)行政法治的有效保障。在我國(guó)法治化建設(shè)過(guò)程中,尤其應(yīng)當(dāng)加強(qiáng)行政程序領(lǐng)域中證據(jù)制度的研究和立法完善。本文旨在依循法治的理念,綜合運(yùn)用語(yǔ)義分析、功能分析、規(guī)范分析、歷史分析、實(shí)證分析和比較分析等研究方法,對(duì)行政程序證據(jù)制度作較為深入的闡釋。文章第一章主要是在界定行政程序概念的基礎(chǔ)上展開(kāi)對(duì)法治理念下的行政程序、行政程序證據(jù)制度與行政法治、行政程序證據(jù)制度與正當(dāng)行政程序關(guān)系等問(wèn)題的討論,并主張?jiān)谛姓ㄖ�、正�?dāng)行政程序理念下構(gòu)建行政程序證據(jù)制度。第二章主要對(duì)行政程序證據(jù)制度若干基本問(wèn)題作相關(guān)介紹。該部分立足于證據(jù)概念的分析,對(duì)行政程序證據(jù)和行政程序證據(jù)制度概念進(jìn)行界定,并且論述行政程序證據(jù)與行政訴訟證據(jù)的區(qū)別與聯(lián)系,同時(shí)分析行政程序證據(jù)的屬性、種類、特征以及行政證據(jù)制度及其功能等基本問(wèn)題。第三章對(duì)行政程序證據(jù)制度價(jià)值進(jìn)行分析。該部分立足于行政程序價(jià)值的分析對(duì)行政程序證據(jù)制度的價(jià)值進(jìn)行定位,主張行政程序證據(jù)制度應(yīng)以實(shí)現(xiàn)公正和效率均衡為價(jià)值取向。第四章按照行政程序證據(jù)證明程序取證、舉證、質(zhì)證、認(rèn)證、查證的邏輯順序分別論述行政程序證據(jù)取證制度、舉證制度、質(zhì)證制度、認(rèn)證制度、查證制度,以及與此相對(duì)應(yīng)的證據(jù)收集規(guī)則、證明責(zé)任分配規(guī)則、證據(jù)認(rèn)證規(guī)則以及證據(jù)審查規(guī)則。初步勾勒出行政程序證據(jù)具體制度的基本理論體系。第五章對(duì)我國(guó)行政程序證據(jù)制度如何立法完善進(jìn)行展望。該部分通過(guò)域外行政程序中的證據(jù)制度立法狀況的介紹和比較研究,對(duì)照我國(guó)立法狀況,尤其是相關(guān)制度的缺陷和不足,提出若干完善建議,并主張通過(guò)將之附屬于行政程序法的立法模式對(duì)之進(jìn)行系統(tǒng)規(guī)范。并提出在條件尚未成熟時(shí),可以對(duì)行政程序證據(jù)制度進(jìn)行分階段、有計(jì)劃的立法。
[Abstract]:The rule of law is not only a macro requirement for the mechanism of social governance, the mode of social activities and the state of social order, but also needs the support of specific systems in the micro field such as administrative law enforcement. To a certain extent, the evidence system of administrative procedure is an effective guarantee of administrative rule of law from the micro level. In the process of the construction of rule of law in our country, the research and legislative perfection of evidence system in the field of administrative procedure should be strengthened. The purpose of this paper is to explain the evidence system of administrative procedure by means of semantic analysis, functional analysis, normative analysis, historical analysis, empirical analysis and comparative analysis, in accordance with the concept of the rule of law. The first chapter of the article mainly discusses the administrative procedure under the concept of rule of law, the relationship between the administrative procedure evidence system and the administrative rule of law, the administrative procedure evidence system and the due process of administration on the basis of defining the concept of administrative procedure. And advocate the construction of administrative procedure evidence system under the concept of administrative rule of law and proper administrative procedure. The second chapter mainly introduces some basic problems of administrative procedure evidence system. This part is based on the analysis of the concept of evidence, defines the concept of administrative procedural evidence and administrative procedural evidence system, and discusses the differences and relations between administrative procedural evidence and administrative litigation evidence, and analyzes the attributes of administrative procedural evidence. Types, characteristics and administrative evidence system and its functions and other basic issues. The third chapter analyzes the value of administrative procedure evidence system. This part is based on the analysis of the value of administrative procedure evidence system to position the value of administrative procedure evidence system, and argues that the value orientation of administrative procedure evidence system should be to realize the balance of justice and efficiency. The fourth chapter discusses the administrative procedure evidence collection system, proof system, cross-examination system, authentication system, verification system according to the logical order of administrative procedure evidence proof procedure, proof, cross-examination, cross-examination and verification. And the corresponding evidence collection rules, burden of proof allocation rules, evidence authentication rules and evidence review rules. A preliminary outline of the administrative procedure evidence specific system of the basic theoretical system. The fifth chapter looks forward to how to perfect the evidence system of administrative procedure in our country. Through the introduction and comparative study of the legislative situation of the evidence system in the foreign administrative procedure, this part puts forward some suggestions for perfecting the legislative situation of our country, especially the defects and shortcomings of the relevant system. It also advocates that it should be regulated systematically through the legislative mode which is attached to the administrative procedure law. It is pointed out that when the conditions are not yet mature, the administrative procedure evidence system can be legislated in stages and in a planned way.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：蘇州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：博士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2010
【分類號(hào)】：D925.3

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 李永才;行政證據(jù)規(guī)定對(duì)行政證據(jù)活動(dòng)的影響探析[J];成都行政學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2003年02期

2 彭海青;論美國(guó)證據(jù)法上司法審查中的證明標(biāo)準(zhǔn)——兼論我國(guó)行政訴訟證明標(biāo)準(zhǔn)之革新[J];當(dāng)代法學(xué);2001年10期

3 于敏;試論數(shù)據(jù)電文的證據(jù)資格[J];湖南省政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2002年01期

4 陳宏光;簡(jiǎn)論行政訴訟的適用規(guī)則[J];安徽警官職業(yè)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2002年01期

5 陳瑞華;從認(rèn)識(shí)論走向價(jià)值論——證據(jù)法理論基礎(chǔ)的反思與重構(gòu)[J];法學(xué);2001年01期

6 高秦偉;正當(dāng)行政程序的判斷模式[J];法商研究;2004年04期

7 沈�？�;論行政證據(jù)中的若干法律問(wèn)題[J];法商研究;2004年01期

8 徐振杰;中外關(guān)于電子文件證據(jù)的法律法規(guī)[J];湖南檔案;2002年10期

9 黃學(xué)賢;行政法中的比例原則研究[J];法律科學(xué)-西北政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2001年01期

10 秦宗文;論行政訴訟的證明標(biāo)準(zhǔn)──以刑事和民事訴訟為基點(diǎn)的分析[J];甘肅政法成人教育學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2001年02期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 范順姬;行政證據(jù)若干法律問(wèn)題探析[D];蘇州大學(xué);2006年

2 周士逵;行政證據(jù)制度研究[D];西南政法大學(xué);2006年

3 苑棟;我國(guó)行政證據(jù)制度研究[D];鄭州大學(xué);2007年

，

本文編號(hào)：2475621