法治原則下的行政裁決制度研究
發(fā)布時間：2019-04-27 20:37
【摘要】：在我國,隨著依法行政的逐步推進,更多的行政行為被納入法治化的軌道。法治的關鍵在于治權,治權的重中之重就是如何控制行政權。行政裁決權作為行政權的一種,在社會主義經(jīng)濟生活中發(fā)揮著有效配置經(jīng)濟資源、迅速化解社會矛盾的重要作用,它能否依法行使與人們的生活有著密切的關系。在和諧社會的背景下,行政裁決作為一種解紛的方式既能做到有效保障當事人的合法利益,又能減輕法院的負擔,是一種理想的解紛方式。市場經(jīng)濟下行政管理對象的復雜化和貫徹司法程序的公正性決定了行政裁決產(chǎn)生和存在的必要性。但是現(xiàn)在國內對行政裁決制度的研究還不夠全面,沒有進行有效的整合,不能適應現(xiàn)代社會法律制度變遷的需要。 本文的目的就是希望通過對我國行政裁決制度的歷史與現(xiàn)狀進行分析,在對其屬性進行科學界定的基礎上,進一步說明我國的行政裁決制度符合我國的法治原則,有其存在的必要,應加以完善。并通過對這一制度理論上的分析,揭示其在社會實踐中存在的弊端,提出相應的對策,進行重構性設計。正文共分為四個部分： 第一部分是對行政裁決的概念、特征進行界定和概括,明確行政裁決的性質,即行政裁決是一種準司法行政行為。然后闡述行政裁決的社會功能,明確其在解決社會糾紛,構建和諧社會中發(fā)揮著重要的作用。通過對比,分析我國行政裁決制度的事項范圍存在的問題。 第二部分是使用比較分析的方法,從行政裁決的主體、程序、以及救濟制度等方面與國內外類似制度進行比較和區(qū)分,揭示我國行政裁決制度現(xiàn)存的問題,并分析癥結所在,結合國內外已有的成功經(jīng)驗,提出對策。 第三部分是通過描述行政裁決制度在不同歷史時期的產(chǎn)生和發(fā)展變化,來分析這一制度的一般規(guī)律和特殊性,對其符合我國的法治原則進行論述,并分析制約我國行政裁決制度發(fā)展的因素。 第四部分在客觀評估和實證分析我國行政裁決現(xiàn)狀的基礎上,綜合國外行政裁決制度與我國法治實踐經(jīng)驗,對行政裁決制度提出重構性設計。 行政裁決所具有的獨特魅力,既適應了市場經(jīng)濟時代人們對司法救濟迅速、低廉的要求,又彌補了行政訴訟的不足。因此我們必須完善行政裁決的相關制度,加強立法工作和執(zhí)法力度,才能充分發(fā)揮行政裁決的作用。
[Abstract]:In our country, with the gradual advancement of administration according to law, more and more administrative acts have been brought into the track of rule by law. The key to the rule of law lies in the administration of power, the most important of which is how to control the executive power. As a kind of administrative power, administrative adjudication power plays an important role in the effective allocation of economic resources and the rapid resolution of social contradictions in socialist economic life. Whether it can be exercised in accordance with the law has a close relationship with people's lives. Under the background of harmonious society, administrative adjudication, as a way of resolving disputes, can not only effectively protect the legitimate interests of the parties concerned, but also lighten the burden of the court. It is an ideal way to resolve disputes. Under the market economy, the complexity of the administrative object and the justice of the judicial procedure determine the necessity of the emergence and existence of the administrative decision. However, the domestic research on the administrative adjudication system is not comprehensive enough, without effective integration, can not meet the needs of the changes of the modern social legal system. The purpose of this paper is to analyze the history and present situation of the administrative adjudication system in our country, and on the basis of the scientific definition of its attribute, the author further explains that the administrative adjudication system of our country conforms to the principle of rule of law in our country. There is a need for its existence, which should be perfected. Through the theoretical analysis of this system, the disadvantages of the system in the social practice are revealed, and the corresponding countermeasures are put forward, and the reconstruction design is carried out. The main body is divided into four parts: the first part is to define and generalize the concept and characteristics of the administrative award, and to clarify the nature of the administrative award, that is, the administrative award is a quasi-judicial administrative act. Then it expounds the social function of administrative adjudication and makes clear that it plays an important role in resolving social disputes and constructing harmonious society. Through the comparison, this paper analyzes the problems existing in the scope of the administrative adjudication system in China. The second part uses the method of comparative analysis, compares and distinguishes with the similar system at home and abroad from the subject, procedure and relief system of the administrative award, reveals the existing problems of the administrative adjudication system in our country, and analyzes the crux of the problem. Combined with the successful experience at home and abroad, the countermeasures are put forward. The third part is to describe the emergence and development of the administrative adjudication system in different historical periods, to analyze the general law and particularity of this system, and to discuss the principle of rule of law in accordance with the rule of law in our country. It also analyzes the factors that restrict the development of the administrative adjudication system in our country. In the fourth part, on the basis of objective evaluation and empirical analysis of the present situation of administrative adjudication in our country, combining the foreign administrative adjudication system with the practical experience of our country's rule of law, the author puts forward the reconstruction design of the administrative adjudication system. The unique charm of administrative adjudication not only adapts to the requirement of judicial relief rapidly and cheaply in market economy era, but also makes up for the deficiency of administrative litigation. Therefore, we must perfect the relevant system of administrative adjudication, strengthen the legislative work and enforce the law, in order to give full play to the role of administrative adjudication.
【學位授予單位】：安徽大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2011
【分類號】：D922.1
本文編號：2467291
[Abstract]:In our country, with the gradual advancement of administration according to law, more and more administrative acts have been brought into the track of rule by law. The key to the rule of law lies in the administration of power, the most important of which is how to control the executive power. As a kind of administrative power, administrative adjudication power plays an important role in the effective allocation of economic resources and the rapid resolution of social contradictions in socialist economic life. Whether it can be exercised in accordance with the law has a close relationship with people's lives. Under the background of harmonious society, administrative adjudication, as a way of resolving disputes, can not only effectively protect the legitimate interests of the parties concerned, but also lighten the burden of the court. It is an ideal way to resolve disputes. Under the market economy, the complexity of the administrative object and the justice of the judicial procedure determine the necessity of the emergence and existence of the administrative decision. However, the domestic research on the administrative adjudication system is not comprehensive enough, without effective integration, can not meet the needs of the changes of the modern social legal system. The purpose of this paper is to analyze the history and present situation of the administrative adjudication system in our country, and on the basis of the scientific definition of its attribute, the author further explains that the administrative adjudication system of our country conforms to the principle of rule of law in our country. There is a need for its existence, which should be perfected. Through the theoretical analysis of this system, the disadvantages of the system in the social practice are revealed, and the corresponding countermeasures are put forward, and the reconstruction design is carried out. The main body is divided into four parts: the first part is to define and generalize the concept and characteristics of the administrative award, and to clarify the nature of the administrative award, that is, the administrative award is a quasi-judicial administrative act. Then it expounds the social function of administrative adjudication and makes clear that it plays an important role in resolving social disputes and constructing harmonious society. Through the comparison, this paper analyzes the problems existing in the scope of the administrative adjudication system in China. The second part uses the method of comparative analysis, compares and distinguishes with the similar system at home and abroad from the subject, procedure and relief system of the administrative award, reveals the existing problems of the administrative adjudication system in our country, and analyzes the crux of the problem. Combined with the successful experience at home and abroad, the countermeasures are put forward. The third part is to describe the emergence and development of the administrative adjudication system in different historical periods, to analyze the general law and particularity of this system, and to discuss the principle of rule of law in accordance with the rule of law in our country. It also analyzes the factors that restrict the development of the administrative adjudication system in our country. In the fourth part, on the basis of objective evaluation and empirical analysis of the present situation of administrative adjudication in our country, combining the foreign administrative adjudication system with the practical experience of our country's rule of law, the author puts forward the reconstruction design of the administrative adjudication system. The unique charm of administrative adjudication not only adapts to the requirement of judicial relief rapidly and cheaply in market economy era, but also makes up for the deficiency of administrative litigation. Therefore, we must perfect the relevant system of administrative adjudication, strengthen the legislative work and enforce the law, in order to give full play to the role of administrative adjudication.
【學位授予單位】：安徽大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2011
【分類號】：D922.1
【參考文獻】
相關期刊論文 前10條
1 張淑平,陳政忠;我國行政裁決的立法現(xiàn)狀分析和建議[J];福建政法管理干部學院學報;2001年01期
2 周頡;;論對行政裁決的行政復議[J];法制與社會;2007年02期
3 敖雙紅,彭旭輝;試論行政裁決的司法審查[J];湖南財經(jīng)高等�？茖W校學報;2002年04期
4 彭云業(yè),張慧平;論行政裁決[J];理論探索;2000年05期
5 金光明;論治安賠償裁決的廢止——基于行政權和司法權分立的法理分析[J];四川師范大學學報(社會科學版);2005年03期
6 尤春媛;論行政裁決之法律救濟[J];山西大學學報(哲學社會科學版);2004年05期
7 陸偉明;;服務型政府的行政裁決職能及其規(guī)制[J];西南政法大學學報;2009年02期
8 吉雅;關于不服行政裁決的復議與訴訟問題[J];行政法學研究;1996年01期
9 肖澤晟;行政裁決及法律救濟[J];行政法學研究;1998年03期
10 姜明安;新世紀行政法發(fā)展的走向[J];中國法學;2002年01期
相關碩士學位論文 前3條
1 熊伊敏;行政裁決救濟制度研究[D];中國政法大學;2008年
2 徐婉婕;論行政裁決制度[D];四川師范大學;2008年
3 李德仁;論對行政裁決的司法救濟[D];南京師范大學;2007年
，本文編號：2467291
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/shekelunwen/minzhuminquanlunwen/2467291.html
