國際法治視角下的BIT“聯(lián)合解釋”問題研究——以中國締約文本為切入點(diǎn)
發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-10-21 13:19
【摘要】：中國目前對(duì)外締結(jié)的BIT中,已有六份文本包含了"聯(lián)合解釋"條款,即授權(quán)締約雙方通過聯(lián)合解釋處理爭議中的法律問題。聯(lián)合解釋在國際投資爭議中已有實(shí)踐,但也因投資者"正當(dāng)期待"、溯及力等問題,引發(fā)了是否符合國際法治理念的質(zhì)疑。從國際法律淵源的角度講,條約聯(lián)合解釋屬于締約國固有權(quán)力的延伸,也是國際法治的基本推動(dòng)力量。聯(lián)合解釋必然服務(wù)于某種政治目的,但只要對(duì)其進(jìn)行法治化規(guī)范,就無損于國際法治的基本精神。中國目前締約文本已經(jīng)日趨完善,但仍須注意明確設(shè)定解釋時(shí)限,并對(duì)各類解釋的法律約束力進(jìn)行更加嚴(yán)謹(jǐn)?shù)拇朕o。
[Abstract]:At present, six texts of BIT concluded by China include "joint interpretation" clause, that is, the contracting parties are authorized to deal with legal issues in disputes through joint interpretation. Joint interpretation has been put into practice in international investment disputes, but due to investors'"legitimate expectation" and retroactivity, it has raised questions as to whether it conforms to the concept of international rule of law. From the perspective of international legal sources, the joint interpretation of treaties is the extension of the inherent power of the contracting States and the basic driving force of the international rule of law. Joint interpretation is bound to serve some political purpose, but as long as it is regulated by law, the basic spirit of international rule of law will be destroyed. At present, China's treaty texts are becoming more and more perfect, but it is still necessary to set a clear time limit for interpretation and to use more precise wording on the legal binding force of various interpretations.
【作者單位】： 吉林大學(xué)法學(xué)院;
【基金】：2016年度國家社科基金青年項(xiàng)目“條約解釋的新趨勢(shì)和中國影響力研究”(16CFX066) 2016年度吉林大學(xué)種子基金項(xiàng)目“‘一帶一路’戰(zhàn)略下適應(yīng)投資便利化的國家安全制度設(shè)計(jì)研究”(2016ZZ037)
【分類號(hào)】：D996.4
本文編號(hào)：2285201
[Abstract]:At present, six texts of BIT concluded by China include "joint interpretation" clause, that is, the contracting parties are authorized to deal with legal issues in disputes through joint interpretation. Joint interpretation has been put into practice in international investment disputes, but due to investors'"legitimate expectation" and retroactivity, it has raised questions as to whether it conforms to the concept of international rule of law. From the perspective of international legal sources, the joint interpretation of treaties is the extension of the inherent power of the contracting States and the basic driving force of the international rule of law. Joint interpretation is bound to serve some political purpose, but as long as it is regulated by law, the basic spirit of international rule of law will be destroyed. At present, China's treaty texts are becoming more and more perfect, but it is still necessary to set a clear time limit for interpretation and to use more precise wording on the legal binding force of various interpretations.
【作者單位】： 吉林大學(xué)法學(xué)院;
【基金】：2016年度國家社科基金青年項(xiàng)目“條約解釋的新趨勢(shì)和中國影響力研究”(16CFX066) 2016年度吉林大學(xué)種子基金項(xiàng)目“‘一帶一路’戰(zhàn)略下適應(yīng)投資便利化的國家安全制度設(shè)計(jì)研究”(2016ZZ037)
【分類號(hào)】：D996.4
【相似文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條
1 張朝霞;謝財(cái)能;;檢法聯(lián)合解釋的價(jià)值與完善[J];法學(xué)雜志;2009年10期
相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前2條
1 俞建寶;吳永栓;;重震聯(lián)合解釋技術(shù)在也門等區(qū)塊的應(yīng)用[A];油氣地球物理實(shí)用新技術(shù)——中國石化石油勘探開發(fā)研究院南京石油物探研究所2004年學(xué)術(shù)交流會(huì)論文集[C];2004年
2 宋學(xué)鋒;劉展;相鵬;孫記紅;;重震聯(lián)合解釋在新疆大龍口地區(qū)的應(yīng)用效果分析[A];中國地球物理學(xué)會(huì)第二十四屆年會(huì)論文集[C];2008年
，本文編號(hào)：2285201
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/shekelunwen/minzhuminquanlunwen/2285201.html
最近更新
教材專著
